The Affordable Care Act, often called Obamacare, gives the federal government the tools to tax religiously-affiliated schools, hospitals, universities and soup kitchens right out of existence if they object to a government mandate.
Last week, I voted to repeal Obamacare because the entire law is bad policy, the mandate expands the role of government to unprecedented levels, and the taxes decimate our religious liberties. This cannot stand.
We have heard a lot about the mandates in the law, but we have not heard much about these hidden taxes on religious freedom. Obamacare includes provisions that trigger penalties already written into our current tax code if the employer chooses not to comply, based on religious or moral convictions, with the Department of Health and Human Services mandate. The Internal Revenue Service allows the government to tax employers to the tune of $100 per day, per employee.
That equals an astounding $36,500 per employee, per year. If a religiously affiliated grade school has 50 employees, they would be taxed $1,825,000 per year, every year, just for exercising their constitutionally protected rights. With taxes so severe and burdensome, it’s hard to imagine that any institution could keep its doors open.
This is the question facing religious institutions and concerned employers today: will you violate your conscience and religious beliefs or pay a hefty tax to follow your faith?
Out of all the taxes in Obamacare, of which there are 21, this to me is the most egregious for its brazen disregard for religious liberty, one of the bedrocks of our country.
That’s why I introduced the Religious Freedom Tax Repeal Act of 2012. This bill will block the taxes that will be levied upon those religious institutions and those who have moral or religious objections in the private sector from having to pay for mandates under Obamacare that violate their religious or moral views.
How did we get to a place where our most precious freedoms are under attack? The Constitution stated: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
If you recall, in February, President Obama and his Department of Health and Human Services announced a “compromise” that was no compromise at all. When Americans across the country and across the political spectrum protested the HHS mandate, the president still decided to force religiously affiliated organizations and employers to facilitate a government mandate that violates core tenants of their faith.
The mandate also states that religious employers are exempt only if their purpose is to instill religious doctrine, to hire and serve exclusively people of their own faith, and qualify as a church or religious order according to a very narrow definition in the tax code.
Under this definition, even Jesus and Mother Theresa would not qualify, to say nothing of the religious charities that have provided relief and services throughout history. The exceptions are essentially irrelevant as most religious institutions providing health, educational or charitable services to others have no protection.
The Obama Administration is forcing employers to choose between either covering various drugs and services contrary to their religious beliefs or refusing to offer health plans to their employees and paying hefty taxes.
In addition to repealing the full law, I will continue to work in Congress with my co-sponsors to stop this religious freedom tax.
No one wants their congressman to be devoid of all reason and blindly follow the path of the credit card companies that own him... Senselessbrenner has an OPINION on everything, even things not in existence yet, and the beauty of it all is that you do not even have to ask him for his opinion, he gives it freely... he may be seen talking to trees and lamp posts...
Has Romneycare really been a success story in Massachusetts? You may call it successful because 98% of the people are covered, but many reports rate it as a dismal failure as costs have been spiraling out of control and access to healthcare has gotten worse for many people.
In closing, let me state here that TRUE places of religion do enjoy a TAX EXEMPT STATUS – even though by any cogent and reasonable standard they are businesses – loosely affiliated religious institutions do not enjoy that status. The tax burden for every American is greatly increased because these TRUE places of religion are TAX EXEMPT, never pay any money into the support of the country, and yet, feel free to use their money and influence in the background to undermine the very secular institutions that allow them to exist. This makes LOBBYISTS look downright saintly…
link for the "many reports" that rate Romneycare a failure, please? As for cost controls, Obamacare contains quite a few - There are limits to how much insurance can raise prices; standards for the ratio of care to overhead an insurance company can spend, and the whole thing is tied in with Medicaid/Medicare cost controls. It's quite a kludge, in my opinion, but it breaks the Republican stonewalling of the past two decades and hopefully can be refined in the future. In fact, some of the worst parts have already been changed in Congress. If people like Rep S would actually offer sensible tweaks to the ACA instead of posturing about religious freedoms the whole country would be better off.
http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content.cfm?content_id=228526&page=1&topic=WS_HLM2_HEP http://www.pnhp.org/news/2009/february/massachusetts_is_no_.php
I don't resort to name calling or personal attacks. I represent my views as well as the Republican Party of Waukesha County, since they coincide. You may disagree and that is your right, but I will continue to write what I believe, and am proud to do so.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2012/01/20/romney-care-massachusetts-healthcare-reform/
Thanks for the links. However all three links point to the same study. That study states that the main problems with 'Romneycare' are the rising premiums and unnecessary overhead at the insurance companies. Obamacare addresses these issues. Also, the study recommends "a national, nonprofit, single-payer system" as a way to solve these issues. I like it! How about you?
I don't know that I consider Forbes "(conservative)", but I don't think the author is even close to conservative. His normal beat is Russia and China, not health care. Do you understand that the ACA is probably not going to be "free" for anyone that has to pay now? If you are one bill away from financial ruin, the ACA may not be a great savior. You say "The public is done being fooled", I say, as the public, I still don't have enough answers.
A suggestion, GOYA, Get Off Your Ass and READ! There is simply no excuse, especially after all this time has passed, for any reasonably intelligent citizen of this country to claim ignorance or lack of knowledge on something that effects EVERYONE, and 18% of our GDP...
The cost of premiums is capped to 125% of the amount spent on actual healthcare in the case of individual policies. Since spending on the healthcare of those with pre-existing conditions and those who require a lot of medical attention is wholly included in the latter, the only insurance companies that will go out of business are the ones that are grossly inefficient at providing actual healthcare to their customers who are paying for it. Some state markets are dominated by utterly inefficient insurance companies, which is why the PPACA allows states with utterly inefficient markets to apply for temporary relaxations of this requirement to give such companies time to become more efficient so as to avoid their exit from the individual policy marketplace altogether. Some such waivers are granted; some are not. Efficient insurance companies will survive and thrive; those which exist simply to exploit policyholders to pay for their own bureaucracy will not.
As for the affordability of this package, it's not only the model in MA, but in a bunch of other countries as well. Germany, for example, has the same kind of mandated system provided for by private insurance companies. The system works well, is solvent, and the private companies remain profitable. The whole "sky is falling" argument about this is simple fear-mongering, that ignores the realities of every other similar system already in existence as well as the numerous studies that have shown how the plan will work.
Great reply! Senselessbrenner has always found ways to "stir the pot" create divisiveness and fear among the masses. If this was a different era, he would be our HITLER! This buffoon is a total waste to the human gene pool...
I want freedom FROM religion! You flat-earthers have just about killed everything beautiful on this planet!