.
Feedback

Obamacare is So Flawed, We Have to Start Over

Regardless of the Supreme Court decides on health care law, we should repeal it and replace it with common-sense solutions that will make health care more affordable for Americans.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of Obamacare sometime this month. Americans want to repeal all or part of the law by margin of 2 to 1. It’s no wonder, as we are living the nightmare of Nancy Pelosi’s “We have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it.”

While we wait for the court’s decision, the president’s health care law has already become a giant discouragement to our job creators. In order to pay for the monstrous new entitlement, the bill includes several new taxes.


One example was the expanded 1099 reporting requirement that would have forced businesses to a file a tax form with the IRS every time they paid more than $600 to a vendor in a year. The provision would have particularly hurt small businesses that do not have the manpower and resources necessary for filing the additional paperwork.   

Thankfully, both political parties realized that new tax was a mistake and Congress repealed the provision.

Last week, I supported legislation to repeal another Obamacare tax because it threatens life-saving innovations and Wisconsin jobs.  The president’s health care law included a 2.3 percent tax on the sale of medical devices in the U.S. This is a tax on the sale of devices like knee replacements, pacemakers, and prosthetic limbs.

This tax is going to threaten thousands of jobs, even up to 43,000, according to analysts. Our economy is still lagging, with much lower-than-expected national job creation reported in May. The threat posed by this Obamacare tax in particular hits close to home for us in Wisconsin.

One of the most innovative and successful medical device makers is GE Healthcare. GE Healthcare, which has offices throughout our state, employs around 6,500 Wisconsinites — many of whom  are in my district in Waukesha at one of their division headquarters.

These are good-paying jobs that bring top-notch talent to our state. Obamacare is threatening to tax these jobs right out of America and out of Wisconsin.

The chief Medicare actuary predicts that because this tax makes certain devices more expensive, the cost will hit us all with higher health care costs. For example, the dental industry estimates that the tax will increase the cost of dental care by $160 million per year.

The medical device tax will also have the deadly effect of discouraging research and development.

One has to ask, how many life-saving medical devices won’t be discovered as a result of this tax on innovation?

America has been an incubator for medical advances. But this tax, tacked on to all the other new mandates and taxes in Obamacare, threatens to reduce the amount of investment in R&D and stall future innovation at American companies.  

Clearly, the argument for repeal is getting stronger as we learn more about the job-killing taxes, mandates, and budget gimmicks hidden in the law.

Regardless of the Supreme Court decision, we should repeal the law and replace it with focused, common-sense solutions that will make health care more affordable for Americans.

We will not repeat the mistakes of Democrats. We will not jam through a bill that forces us to “pass the bill to find out what is in it.” And we will not pass a law the American people don’t support or don’t want.

We will empower families and doctors to make health care decisions — not Washington bureaucrats.

St. Swithin June 11, 2012 at 01:40 am
Isn't it so awful that the Democrats want to actually raise some income to pay for the healthcare bill?! When Rep. S was voting for Medicare D he didn't worry about a trivial matter like finding money to cover the increased debt. In fact, before Obama became president I don't think there was any spending bill he didn't like, regardless of whether it was paid for or not. And of course Rep S. can remember when healthcare first became a national issue in the 90's. Since then our healthcare crisis has gotten much worse, but I don't remember Rep S doing a single thing about it, except for Medicare D. He seems pretty adept at throwing stones when he has no alternative suggestions. Then he tosses in the old lie about "jam through a bill that forces us to “pass the bill to find out what is in it.” Rep S - you and the rest of the Republicans had a decade to fix healthcare and you did nothing. Let Obamacare work for a few years so we can honestly judge it's merit. Of course, you fear it might actually be successful. That is why you try so hard to bring it down.
Norma Jean June 11, 2012 at 01:49 am
Since Obama care has been in effect,my health insurance has gone up and the benefits have gone way down. No, it is not more affordable for me. In fact it hurts a lot! I am at the low end of the tax bracket, so don't tell me that this is best!
Johnny Seed June 11, 2012 at 02:35 am
Norma Jean if your anything like me my rates have gone up every year large amounts almost every year for the last decade. Obamacare has only been phased in for the last eighteen months and my rates actually raised about the same as previous years. Benefits and consumer protection and my rights have improved. I am tired of health care insurance ceo's making 10's of millions and even 100 plus million dollar payouts while cutting benefits and raising rates. Obamacare makes health insurers accountable something our state has done in many areas except health insurance.
Johnny Seed June 11, 2012 at 12:17 pm
AWD - I strongly disagree, rigtht now you and I are paying for other peoples health care already. Obamacare makes it so people that can afford to have healthcare must have some so the rest of us do not have to pay for them. It also uses programs like our states badger care where low income people can get insurance at reduced rates. These people would use medical services and just not pay the bill where now they contribute to the cost of health insurance. Obama care also makes drug companies supply drugs to seniors at reduced rates.
Randy1949 June 11, 2012 at 01:46 pm
@AWD -- How much does your employer pay for his share of your healthcare? I bet it's even more than $835. Think of the extra profit your employer could earn and the extra jobs he could create if that burden were lifted off his shoulders. Or he could pay you more or lower the costs of his goods and services. You're so anti-business, AWD!
----- June 11, 2012 at 01:59 pm
As a nurse, I support the Affordable Healthcare Act. The responsibility of obtaining healthcare will shift to the individual. It's no secret that hospitalization costs are covered for insured and uninsured. It's all of us who are working and insured who pay for those who are not insured. The Affordable Healthcare Act begins to target the explosive growth of healthcare costs---costs that will continue to rise greatly in the next decade.
As a mother, I am grateful for the Affordable Healthcare Act. MY 26 year old is covered today, through me, because of it. My child works, but healthcare is not affordable at the minimum wage job. In the meantime, I am not being forced to change my insurance. Anyone who thinks that is misinformed and needs to do a little reading. Last, it is about time our nation came up to speed and assumes equity with the basic need of healthcare. It comes down to this: living on this earth requires healthcare. No one can go without it. No one should. Those who claim that they want the option to omit healthcare will be the first to get in line if they have a bad diagnosis---something that can happen to anyone. They need to stop being selfish. By pooling our resources all of us benefit.
Steve ® June 11, 2012 at 03:28 pm
Next year when you kid is 27 he/she won't have a min. wage job anymore?
Greg June 11, 2012 at 07:14 pm
Well he/she won't have insurance unless he/she gets mother to hand over some money and he/she starts contributing to the pool (to benefit us all).
Greg June 11, 2012 at 07:29 pm
The ACA actually has a 3.8% tax for Real Estate sales. Why should I get taxed to pay for health care just because I sold my house? OK, tax the hell out of tabacco or cheeseburgers, but my house? I fail to see the connection, but I am not a mindless liberal.
Daniel S. June 11, 2012 at 07:35 pm
How do you make people who have no employment, money or address pay for healthcare? The biggest issue is not those uninsured, it's the cost of insurance and the cost of care. Obamacare is not going to change that, whether you think it is or not.
Randy1949 June 11, 2012 at 07:42 pm
Slight correction -- We all pay for the medical care of the uninsured, except for the uninsured who have any personal wealth to lose, in which case they lose the house the car, the bank account, and then we pay for them.
It doesn't happen only to the uninsured. Years ago I worked with a man who was going bankrupt because the insurance company had refused to cover his late wife's last round of chemotherapy.
Jay Sykes June 11, 2012 at 07:55 pm
Well Greg, like Willie Sutton, the other 'Famous Bank Robber' once said "because that's where the money is."
AudiFan June 11, 2012 at 08:11 pm
Recently I've heard the term 'Social Darwinism' used in a negative way by Obama and other radical Progressives. Here is what Social Darwinism is: “an ideology of society that seeks to apply biological concepts of Darwinism or of evolutionary theory to sociology and politics, often with the assumption that conflict between groups in society leads to social progress as superior groups outcompete inferior ones.” I find nothing negative about that description. America would be much better off if we promoted a survival of the fittest as a form of government. Four out of five black women are seriously overweight. One out of four middle-aged black women has diabetes. With $174 billion a year spent on diabetes-related illness in America and obesity quickly overtaking smoking as a cause of cancer deaths, it is past time to try something new.
Greg June 11, 2012 at 08:38 pm
They are, they are taxing home sales... Go figure.
Nick Oliver June 11, 2012 at 09:44 pm
Well, I'm half with you on this one Mr. Sensenbrenner, I also think we should repeal the law. Where we part is my belief that we should NOT replace this crappy system with another crappy system. It is not the role of the United States government to provide any individual citizen (outside of any employee who negotiated terms) ANY healthcare services. Now, should local parties decide they have the funds to help those in need, then by all means, do what we can. I'd rather our lawmakers take a look at the U.S. Constitution and stop deviating from it when looking for things to do.
Greg June 11, 2012 at 11:51 pm
What about my man parts?
Randy1949 June 12, 2012 at 01:13 am
That would work, as long as serious illness was purely a lifestyle choice. But some diseases like cancer and MS just kind of happen. And when they happen to you, you can no longer work, so you lose that insurance. You're too expensive to insure, so you can't afford it on your own. They can drop you and refuse to issue you another policy.
Is that the sort of survival of the fittest you're okay with? Because that could be you, sick and losing everything.
Norma Jean June 12, 2012 at 02:42 am
Rick-If My benefits have gone down and my out of pocket has gone way up. If I got sick right now I would lose everything. Should I cancel my insurance and quit my job and let the government take care of me? I think not. I am not into the socialist agenda. By the way- I worked 10 hours today . I have 2 jobs. I really don't want to work that hard to pay for other people's health insurance who don't really feel like working at all. Sorry.
Johnny Seed June 12, 2012 at 04:03 am
I get it Norma you don't want to pay for other peoples health care. Obama care makes those people that are not paying for there health care participate. That is one of the main battles in the supreme court can the government make people who want the rest of us to pay for them be forced to carrry sort of health insurance.
Bob McBride June 12, 2012 at 11:05 am
If you have to ask...
Jay Sykes June 12, 2012 at 12:42 pm
Lifestyle 'choices' account for more than half of the cost of healthcare. Could most everyone afford the cost of health insurance if it was half the price of what it is today? The the most significant contributors to the cost being double what it needs to be are: obesity(BMI>30) @ about 20%,overweight(30>BMI>25) @ about 10%, and smoking @about 15% of the cost of borne of every person paying for healthcare.
So, please tell me where in the 'Affordable Healthcare Act' they found,identified and targeted these most obvious and 'self inflicted' causes/costs of healthcare, for near elimination, so my costs, and yours, go down by 50%?
Randy1949 June 12, 2012 at 01:24 pm
@Jay Sykes -- If that's the case I should be able to find affordable health insurance as a lifelong nonsmoker with a BMI of about 23. Except that I'm 63, and insurance companies think I'm a serious chronic illness waiting to happen.
As I recall, there was talk of a tax on soft drinks, which had the industry up in arms about the government taking away our freedom of choice. Another part of the high costs is overuse -- those with health insurance go to the doctor for every little thing and demand antibiotics for things like colds. That's bad medicine, and it drives up the cost for the rest of us.
Jay Sykes June 12, 2012 at 02:32 pm
@Randy... Current Federal Law(prior to Obamacare) prevents health insurance 'health incentives' from being more than 20% of the policy cost. So, even if we can identify major personal choices that lower 'your costs' by 50%, one can only see a 20% policy cost savings, within your age rated group;the government has stuck you with paying for others personal choices.
No doubt we can find many areas that raise costs and individual exceptions to the rules. I'm just trying to pick the biggest and lowest hanging fruit, it just happens to be almost half the fruit on the tree. Why climb to the top of the tree?[you might fall and break your leg :) ] Here is a WSJ 2009 op-ed about Safeway grocery that explains some of this: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124476804026308603.html
Keith Brady June 13, 2012 at 10:48 am
@Norma Jean, you must be mistaken if you think Obamacare has anything to do with your alleged health care premium increase and reduced benefits. Most of the law won't even take effect until 2014, and the whole package is designed to *benefit* private insurers by providing them with a flood of new customers.
The effect you claim to have seen is not widely reported: surely if legions of Americans were seeing increases in their premiums as a result of the new law, conservatives would be gleefully pointing this out! The only logical conclusion is that you are lying because you believe it will influence public opinion. Do feel free to provide specifics of your experience to refute my assertion, though. Regards, Keith Brady
Norma Jean June 13, 2012 at 03:56 pm
@Keith,How dare you accuse me of lying. You have no idea what my insurance is like. I don't care about public opinion. I just know what my last year has been like paying out of pocket,which I have never had to do before. This is for routine services. Sorry if you don't agree,just telling it like it is. This is still a free country with freedom of speech ,is it not?
Norma Jean June 13, 2012 at 04:06 pm
@ Johnny, Yes I do agree with you that the insurance company's have made millions and we have had to pay for it. There has got to be a better way to cut the costs without gouging the consumers.
Johnny Seed June 13, 2012 at 04:22 pm
Norma there is a better way it is Obamacare, but the ones that are loosing all the money they were stealing from medicare fraud and some companies that do not pay any taxes would like us to think Obamacare is bad.
Daniel S. June 13, 2012 at 04:42 pm
The bill as it stands, along with the exemptions being allowed is a sham and corrupt; much like the politics that exists in the Windy City (hence the name). How coincidental it is the home of the man in office that railroaded this trash can full of hidden hazards upon the citizens and businesses of the USA.
Johnny Seed June 13, 2012 at 05:10 pm
Daniel S - Most bills that go through Congress are the same what makes this any different than the rest. It is not all on the President, all the excess spending has been a result of Congressmen Democtratic and Republican alike. In the case of Obamacare It will impove the competitive capabilities of this country. You are correct though it needs to be modified and improved overtime and not by reducing responsible decisions that were made to cut fraud and tax the health care industry. Obamacare also puts responsibilities on some healthcare companies that are abusing their nonprofit status some are making large profits while overcharging with excessive rates on those who cannot afford it, have wasteful spending, and are not paying taxes.
morninmist July 31, 2012 at 04:19 pm
Sten has been on the public dime for his health care for decades. Now he is crying. Poor widdle baby.
Meanwhile, most folks do NOT trust Mitt!! Joan 4Obama ‏@jmcaninch68 RT @thehill: Poll: Obama leads Romney by double digits on #healthcare issues (by @sam_baker) http://bit.ly/M1kFiv #p2

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waukesha Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Matt Schroeder (Editor) June 16, 2013 at 10:08 pm
Dawn: Can you tell me about a block or location where it's happening? We might be able to work on aRead More story this week on Patch.
Nancy June 16, 2013 at 10:53 pm
Our spruce trees have been dying as well. Very slowly. This is on upper Coventry lane just acrossRead More from the walkway to Meadowbrook school.
Dori June 17, 2013 at 07:39 am
We lost bushes also. I assumed it was from last summer's drought. We're located near Hy59 andRead More Sunset. I noticed dead trees at Prairie View and Sunset also.
Driving School June 17, 2013 at 12:58 pm
Classes started today!! Students are still able to attend this session by coming to class no laterRead More than tomorrow at 10:00 am. Call our office for directions and enrollment 414-447-0202.
Pennyluhu June 16, 2013 at 07:49 am
I agree that the folks at this Kwik Trip are great at assisting disabled people like myself but IRead More disagree that all Kwik Trips are helpful. There is a law that all gas stations are to assist you if you have disabled plates or a hanging placard if you press the help or disabled key on the pump. If there is no key (and I think all must have them by a certain date) then you are to honk horn twice and if there are at least 2 employees on duty, they are to assist. The K/T on St. Paul is useless. I've waited there, watching at least 3 employees mill around the counter with 1 or 2 customers and ingnore me. The Grandview station same but I haven't tried them in a few months. The worst station for that is whatever the one on St. Paul and Prarie is. I pulled in to see a female worker standing on side of building smoking. When she went in she was greeted by a male worker and I was ignored by both. I'd like to do a survey on how helpful each gas station is to the disabled. Kudos to Fleetfoot Kwik Trip! Whatever they got they should share with their brethren. I would rather give my $ to K/T because they are WI based and they donate regularly to the Salvation Army
Pennyluhu June 16, 2013 at 07:49 am
I agree that the folks at this Kwik Trip are great at assisting disabled people like myself but IRead More disagree that all Kwik Trips are helpful. There is a law that all gas stations are to assist you if you have disabled plates or a hanging placard if you press the help or disabled key on the pump. If there is no key (and I think all must have them by a certain date) then you are to honk horn twice and if there are at least 2 employees on duty, they are to assist. The K/T on St. Paul is useless. I've waited there, watching at least 3 employees mill around the counter with 1 or 2 customers and ingnore me. The Grandview station same but I haven't tried them in a few months. The worst station for that is whatever the one on St. Paul and Prarie is. I pulled in to see a female worker standing on side of building smoking. When she went in she was greeted by a male worker and I was ignored by both. I'd like to do a survey on how helpful each gas station is to the disabled. Kudos to Fleetfoot Kwik Trip! Whatever they got they should share with their brethren. I would rather give my $ to K/T because they are WI based and they donate regularly to the Salvation Army
Mr Lundt June 17, 2013 at 08:02 am
I am fine with this service--its great. However being handicapped does not mean employees need toRead More give up their breaks or other customers need to let you cut in line in front of their service needs.