.
Feedback

Sobering Thoughts: What If We Allowed OWI Convictions to Expire?

The debate continues about whether an OWI offense should be allowed to expire after a set amount of time. Attorney Mark Powers weighs in.

It’s an interesting question. Should we “forgive and forget” when it comes to the manner in which the legal system handles drunk driving convictions? After a set amount of time, should a past conviction be allowed to expire instead of remaining on a person’s record?

Right now, Wisconsin has a “look-back factor” that goes back to 1989. If you’ve ever had a prior conviction going back to January 1, 1989, that conviction can and will be used against you in subsequent offenses. The trick is, on an OWI first or second offense, there’s a 10-year window. 

For example, let’s say you committed your first OWI offense in January 2000.  If you were charged with another first offense after January 2010, you would, in effect, be outside that 10-year window and would be charged with a first offense. So there is a bit of a grace period if you are outside of 10 years with your second offense.

When we work with anything other than a second offense, third or higher, the court looks at your record going back to January 1, 1989.  For a few years, if you had .08 to .10 blood alcohol level OWI offense, and you didn’t have another OWI within 10 years, this offense would be wiped off your record. This is no longer the case since the new Wisconsin legislature changed the OWI laws in 2010.

When we use the term “grace period,” a number of things come into play. For example, if you get a second OWI outside that 10-year period, you are charged with another OWI first offense on your ticket.  It used to be more expansive prior to the law change where if you didn’t get one in that 10-year window, that prior offense was wiped out altogether. Today, if you get two outside that 10-year period, the court will look all the way back lifetime until 1989 excepting OWI homicides, instead of letting that first offense be wiped off your record.  This means if you received OWI convictions in 1990 and 2001 that while those would both be non-criminal first offenses, any third offense would be treated as a criminal third offense.

The question now is should we go back to letting that original offense expire after 10 years? In this day and age, there is a public policy concern regarding “forgive and forget” because society now expects that if you are charged with an OWI, that needs to be known by everybody because repeat OWI offenses and those who continue to drink and drive are threats to society.  We’re talking about people dying or getting seriously injured on our roads and this line of thinking certainly makes sense.

Wisconsin is the only state in the nation that has a ticket for an OWI first offense so, in effect, you’re already getting a break in our state if you get an OWI first offense. Those who advocate for the “forgive and forget” approach are often people who are applying for jobs or are going through their careers where an OWI on their record is a definite hang-up. 

Again, the sword cuts both ways because an OWI first offense in this state is just a ticket offense. It’s not a crime so the end result is public policy dictates that your record should be maintained.  OWI offenses can’t be expunged so if you get one, it’s on your record, in effect, forever.

In a nutshell, it doesn’t appear that the courts will be allowing OWI offenses to “expire” anytime in the foreseeable future. People need to understand that by running the risks of drinking and driving, they are exposing themselves and many other people to far reaching negative consequences. Certainly, nobody wants to hurt or kill anybody as a result of drinking and driving. Nobody wants to go to jail.

Remember, when you get your first OWI offense, it’s not like getting a speeding ticket and you get your license points back after a year. This is something that anytime an employer or school wants your driving record, they are going to see that OWI and may think twice about offering you employment or schooling.

An OWI offense will stay with you for many, many years to come. Think about that the next time you get the urge to party hardy and get behind the wheel.

About Attorney Mark Powers
Attorney Mark Powers is a partner at the criminal defense law firm of Huppertz & Powers, S.C. in Waukesha. Previously, Powers served as an Assistant District Attorney with the Waukesha County District Attorney's office and is currently serving as a municipal judge in North Prairie. Hefocuses in the area of criminal defense, and has handled many cases involving operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, domestic disputes, and drug offenses.

Powers attended Valparaiso University School of Law, where he received his Juris Doctorate. Prior to law school, Mark attended the University of Wisconsin, Lacrosse where he received his bachelor of science in Political Science.

For more information, please call 262.549.5979 or visit  www.waukeshacriminalattorneys.com.

robin white January 8, 2013 at 09:33 pm
Are you people kidding me? This state is RIDICULOUSLY lenient regarding OWI's in the first place and now you want to forgive and forget? I think Wisconsin needs to stop drinking for a second, take a step outside to just about any other state, and look around. Driving drunk IS a serious offense. Should I just forgive and forget if you happen to kill my family because you didn't learn your lesson the first time? I don't think so. If you are drinking and driving, you should get punished! Period. It's not ok to take others lives into your own hands and then just pretend that because it happened 5 or 6 years ago the first time, it never happened. What is wrong with this state? I feel like I'm taking a chance on my families life every time I drive on the roads here.
Greg January 8, 2013 at 09:50 pm
Who are "you people"?
Bren January 8, 2013 at 09:59 pm
I believe the current laws have impact on repeat offenders, which is why a ticket is issued for a first offense. I have no issue with the current laws. Of equal importance is the issue of individuals with suspended/revoked licenses continuing to get behind the wheel.
CowDung January 8, 2013 at 10:02 pm
Drunk drivers scare me a lot more than guns do...
Luke January 8, 2013 at 10:09 pm
We need to learn from proponents of gun control.
First, we need to make gas tanks smaller. The tires on cars need to be limited to 8 inches in diameter. Finally, engine size should be limited to 1 liter, and a background checks and waiting periods should be involved in every car purchase.
Cricket January 8, 2013 at 10:17 pm
I have to agree with everything Robin says. People do not have the right to threaten other peoples safety by being on the road drunk. We need to be a one and done state like the rest of the 49. I am appalled at how people in this state think drinking is some sort of badge of honor. The only people that want to be around sloppy sh-- faced drunks are other sloppy sh-- drunks so please do everyone a favor and do your drinking at home if you must get crocked.
NewNRAMember January 8, 2013 at 10:50 pm
And cars cannot go faster than 55 mph. Who needs to go faster than 55 mph?
Bottom Line January 9, 2013 at 01:41 am
I would agree to continuing the strict employment of OUI laws. I do believe, however, that the history of issues with OUI offenders shows that the level at which we consider impairment ... currently .08, disregards what we intend to arrest. At .10 we were truly dealing with individuals that should not be driving. Most impaired drivers are considerably higher, and repeat offenders are always higher. at .08 we are involving many that are probably not impaired.
We should demand legislation that imprisons repeat offenders for considerably longer sentences, and we should stop pandering to those that think a drink is enough to classify someone as a criminal.
Voice of reason January 9, 2013 at 02:13 am
I totally disagree with robin and all of his/her followers! If I person can prove themselves to have learned a lesson from what could have been a stupid mistake. Not every person that has a first OWI will be a repeat offender! That's like saying that you should be punished for life for a stupid mistake you might have done as a teen. Robin have you ever made a mistake? Or are you perfect? Should you be punished for life for whatever you may have done wrong? Should you be held down from a decent job for something you did 10+ years ago? Not all first OWI offenders are the hardened criminals you make them out to be!
C. Sanders January 10, 2013 at 01:41 am
If you don't care to walk, get a ride, hire a taxi or sleep in the street .... OWI should involve some form of waterboarding to instill a new behavior.
Terry January 11, 2013 at 02:03 pm
There are things that you can do in this world that close doors in your future.
If I get absolutely plastered one night, and go out on my porch and start firing a rifle into the air, the consequences of that will follow me the rest of my life. And it should. Doors will close for me. If I get plastered and drive, I am doing the exact same thing. I am endangering the lives of everyone around me, just like I would if I was standing on the porch with that gun. Getting caught for it, will close doors for me. Actions have consequence, and yes, some of them are long lasting. Protecting people from that though, does not promote learning.
Jaime Lannister January 14, 2013 at 04:45 am
Robin, your plan places about 1 in 5 Wisconsin citizens in prison at any given time, and 1 in 20 working as prison guards. How do you plan to pay for this?
Jaime Lannister January 14, 2013 at 05:00 am
It's ironic how many folks seem to believe that beating drunk drivers with the proverbial bigger and stronger club is the answer. Give the drinking population an affordable and convenient form of safe transportation and your drunk driving problem will go away.
I for one do not drink and drive, but I am also smart enough to see that the vast majority of the people who live here cannot pay $80 every time they go out for a round trip cab ride like I do.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waukesha Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Matt Schroeder (Editor) June 16, 2013 at 10:08 pm
Dawn: Can you tell me about a block or location where it's happening? We might be able to work on aRead More story this week on Patch.
Nancy June 16, 2013 at 10:53 pm
Our spruce trees have been dying as well. Very slowly. This is on upper Coventry lane just acrossRead More from the walkway to Meadowbrook school.
Dori June 17, 2013 at 07:39 am
We lost bushes also. I assumed it was from last summer's drought. We're located near Hy59 andRead More Sunset. I noticed dead trees at Prairie View and Sunset also.
Driving School June 17, 2013 at 12:58 pm
Classes started today!! Students are still able to attend this session by coming to class no laterRead More than tomorrow at 10:00 am. Call our office for directions and enrollment 414-447-0202.
Pennyluhu June 16, 2013 at 07:49 am
I agree that the folks at this Kwik Trip are great at assisting disabled people like myself but IRead More disagree that all Kwik Trips are helpful. There is a law that all gas stations are to assist you if you have disabled plates or a hanging placard if you press the help or disabled key on the pump. If there is no key (and I think all must have them by a certain date) then you are to honk horn twice and if there are at least 2 employees on duty, they are to assist. The K/T on St. Paul is useless. I've waited there, watching at least 3 employees mill around the counter with 1 or 2 customers and ingnore me. The Grandview station same but I haven't tried them in a few months. The worst station for that is whatever the one on St. Paul and Prarie is. I pulled in to see a female worker standing on side of building smoking. When she went in she was greeted by a male worker and I was ignored by both. I'd like to do a survey on how helpful each gas station is to the disabled. Kudos to Fleetfoot Kwik Trip! Whatever they got they should share with their brethren. I would rather give my $ to K/T because they are WI based and they donate regularly to the Salvation Army
Pennyluhu June 16, 2013 at 07:49 am
I agree that the folks at this Kwik Trip are great at assisting disabled people like myself but IRead More disagree that all Kwik Trips are helpful. There is a law that all gas stations are to assist you if you have disabled plates or a hanging placard if you press the help or disabled key on the pump. If there is no key (and I think all must have them by a certain date) then you are to honk horn twice and if there are at least 2 employees on duty, they are to assist. The K/T on St. Paul is useless. I've waited there, watching at least 3 employees mill around the counter with 1 or 2 customers and ingnore me. The Grandview station same but I haven't tried them in a few months. The worst station for that is whatever the one on St. Paul and Prarie is. I pulled in to see a female worker standing on side of building smoking. When she went in she was greeted by a male worker and I was ignored by both. I'd like to do a survey on how helpful each gas station is to the disabled. Kudos to Fleetfoot Kwik Trip! Whatever they got they should share with their brethren. I would rather give my $ to K/T because they are WI based and they donate regularly to the Salvation Army
Mr Lundt June 17, 2013 at 08:02 am
I am fine with this service--its great. However being handicapped does not mean employees need toRead More give up their breaks or other customers need to let you cut in line in front of their service needs.