Bill Introduced to Benefit Drunk Drivers at the Expense of Workers

Wisconsin State Senate and Assembly consider bills to benefit drunk drivers at the expense of workers with health insurance.

In an unprecedented move, a bill was introduced to the Wisconsin State Senate and Assembly to benefit drunk drivers at the expense of Wisconsin workers with health insuruance.

The bills, 2013 SB 22 and AB 29, seek to overturn an over 100 year old Wisconsin law known as the Collateral Source Rule. The Collateral Source Rule requires those who injure another, whether through an auto accident, drunk driving, texting while driving, failing to move to the left for a police officer, etc., to pay the full cost of the injured person's medical bills. The Collateral Source Rule has been in effect in Wisconsin for over 100 years and has been upheld by every sitting Wisconsin Supreme Court justice.

A handful of Wisconsin Legislatures (Representatives Jacque, Bies, Craig, Czaja, Kestell, Kuglitsch, Larson, Murphy, Sanfelippo, Spiros, Thiesfeldt, Weatherston, Ripp and Marklein; cosponsored by Senators Farrow and Grothmam) want to overturn this law to allow those who injure another to argue that they are not responsible for the full cost of the injured person's medical bills, but rather only the amount paid by the injured person's health insurance.

Here is how the current law works and the proposed change. John Doe works on the assembly line at a local company. Through his employer, John pays tens of thousands of dollars over the years for health insurance. John leaves work to head home. Jack Smith is drunk and texting while driving and blows a red light injuring John. John incurs $10,000 in medical bills. John sends the bills to his health insurance company and, because of the health insurance premiums John has paid over the years, John's health insurance pays $7,000. Under the current law, Jack and his insurance company are responsible for the full amount of John's medical bills ($10,000) without regard to what John's health insurance paid. The reason for this, a reason cited for over 100 years by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, is that Jack does not get to benefit from John's foresight in buying health insurance. Under the proposed bill, Jack and his insurance company would get to argue that John is not entitled to the full amount billed by the health care providers ($10,000) but rather is entitled to only what John's health insurance company paid ($7,000). Under this proposed law, Jack reaps the benefit of John working to pay for health insurance.

In summary, the new law penalizes workers such as John and benefits drunk drivers such as Jack. If you disagree with this proposed bill, call or write your State legislature to say no to 2013 SB 22 and 2013 AB 29.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Greg March 01, 2013 at 01:43 AM
Link to the proposed bill: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2013/related/proposals/sb22
Steve ® March 01, 2013 at 01:47 AM
Obamacare will take care of everyone Bren. You voted and promoted it, so now are you saying it won't?
Greg March 01, 2013 at 02:24 AM
"My goal is to challenge you as to why it is that a defendant should get the benefit of ANY of these collateral sources." Just like in the proposed bill, the key word is MAY. I don't think that a defendant should get the benefit of collateral sources, they may get the benefit. Why do you think that the plaintiff SHOULD get a phantom medical settlement? I know why, it's money in your pocket. Your claim that having your actual medical expenses paid, is or could be "horrible" needs to be expanded upon. Your job is to convince the jury how horrible it is, if the jury agrees they may adjust the payment accordingly. It may be horrible for the defendant to face financial ruin so that you and your client can vacation on an undeserved judgment.
Kevin R Martin March 01, 2013 at 02:56 AM
Greg, the picture next to your name is Uncle Sam flipping the bird and Obama's face in place of Uncle Sam. What is that?
NObama 2012 March 01, 2013 at 03:00 AM
A golfer hooked his tee shot over a hill and onto the next fairway. Walking toward his ball, he saw a man lying on the ground, groaning with pain. "I'm an attorney at Cannon & Dunphy," the wincing man said, "and this is going to cost you $5000." "I'm sorry, I'm really sorry," the concerned golfer replied. "But I did yell 'fore'." "I'll take it," the Cannon & Dunphy attorney said.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »