patching...
Update: Worried about your commute? Check out our traffic map. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Zipperer Stands Behind Voter ID Law

Senator says he will personally help any person in the state who feels disenfranchised under the new law.

 

State Sen. Rich Zipperer (R-City of Pewaukee) said he’s standing behind the new voter ID bill passed by the Legislature this year and will personally help any person in the state who is concerned about being disenfranchised.

“Any constituent, or anybody in the state…if there’s an individual with a legal right to vote, have them contact me or my office and I will make sure they get properly registered and have an ID,” he said. “If you know any individual, bring them to my attention. Even if they don’t live in the 33rd Senate District, I’ll get them to the office of their senator.”

The voter ID bill, which will take effect during the 2012 election cycle, was a top concern of the eight Sussex residents in attendance of a listening session Zipperer held Monday at Village Hall.

The bill requires all voters to show IDs at the poll and also requires them sign the poll list in order to validate the actual identity of the person voting.

The hotly contested bill has been trumpeted as necessary by Gov. Scott Walker and Republican leaders because they said it will help deter voter fraud. However, the bill is still expected to be legally challenged on the grounds it violates the state Constitution.

Resident Emil Glodoski hammered Zipperer for his support of the bill, saying it’s racist and is aimed at suppressing votes. He told the senator the number of people who have actually been caught in the state perpetrating vote fraud wouldn’t even “fill a basketball roster,” yet the number of people who will have their votes suppressed would “fill the Bradley Center two or three times.”

“That’s voter suppression and it moves us into 'Wississippi,'” he said. “(T)his is the first time we’re eliminating voters rights and it’s just racist.”

Resident Jessie Read said she also has concerns about voter suppression with the bill and said the state would be better off because of the number of people out there who don’t have IDs. But Zipperer reiterated he will work to help everyone in the state get an ID or to make sure their votes are cast if they’re legally allowed to vote.

Resident Deborah Zimmerman said she supports the voter ID bill and told Zipperer she worked as a poll observer during the recent recall elections and everyone in line who was asked for an ID had one.

“I’m happy you passed the photo ID requirement for voting, but my concern is same-day registration,” she said. “We’re one of seven states that allows it…but if there’s a same-day registration and that voter is determined to be ineligible, you can’t take their vote back after it's cast and done.”

Even though detractors said only a handful of voter fraud cases have been discovered in the state in the past decade, Zipperer said even if it was only 10 votes found, those 10 illegal votes still cancelled out legitimate votes.

“The goal is to make sure everyone can vote who legally has the right to vote,” he said. “I don’t think the bill we passed solves every instance of voter fraud in the state, but it gets us a lot closer to where we need to be.”

Zipperer, whose district also includes parts of Waukesha, Menomonee Falls and Brookfield, is holding local "office hours" throughout his district this week. He appeared in Waukesha on Monday, and on Wednesday, he will be at the Menomonee Falls Village Hall at 11:30 a.m.; the Waukesha State Bank in Waukesha at 5 p.m.; the Brookfield Town Hall at 6 p.m. and the City of Brookfield Municipal Courtroom at 7 p.m.

Related Topics: Rich Zipperer, Voter supression, Wisconsin State Senate, voter ID, and wisconsin legislature
Do you think the Voter ID law is good or bad for Wisconsin? Tell us in the comments.

Gofaq Uurslf

8:16 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Oh my god, we should recall him now!

Reply

Craig

8:19 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

How the &*@! is voter ID racist?

Reply

Jerry Menting

12:09 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

People seem to read more into these things than was actually there. Unfortunately
half of the people don't trust Scooter and his legislature. With good reason.

Reply

free to speak

7:25 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Those in opposition to ANYTHING/EVERYTHING Scott Walker backs are simply reaching with the disenfranchise and racist "arguments". NOT!!!!!!

Reply

St. Swithin

8:36 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

I am a firm believer that some people are too stupid to vote. With that said, it has always been clear to me that this push for Voter ID has never been more than a way to disenfranchise Democratic voters. The Republicans have trouble even finding cases of voter fraud at the polls. Such fraud has never affected a single election that anyone can name. That is because it is easy to detect and hard to pull off on a large scale. Absentee ballots are easier to fake, and having a corrupt election official is the easiest way to steal an election. Yet, Republicans do nothing about these problems. At a time when they cry about government spending they are willing to blow millions of dollars to implement Voter ID and defend it in the courts. To me, these action speak louder than words - Republicans know that voters who favor Democrats are less likely to have a driver's license.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

12:48 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

How many voters do not have a state issued ID?
Voter fraud without proving who you are is also impossible to track. In the past I could vote for a family member or anyone I knew that was resisted but does not live or will not vote in said election. I know their name and address, bingo vote.

Also, do you know of a good place to get any ribs or BBQ in Milwaukee?

Comment_arrow

bescher

1:08 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Boy Bill you need to get your facts correct.
Did you know that in those states that passed Voter ID the (disenfrancied voters actually came out to vote in higher numbers? You want proof How about you giving us proof that there are people eligible to vote that doesn't have some sort of ID?
2. Since getting a ID is free and the Sen would be more than happy to provide transportation to get a FREE ID what's your beef? Do you complain if a cop stops you and asks for a driver's license? Do you complain if you go to PICK and save and buy alcohol and they ask for your ID? I don't get it you people on the left are complaining about a function that every American citizen should be proud to vote and would be more than willing to provide that ID

Comment_arrow

Keith Best

1:56 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Supplied with a name and an address on the voter rolls, up until this law was passed, anyone could vote, and yet the fraud would be virtually impossible to prove. This will prevent the buses that used to bring up people from Illinois to vote from continuing, using the names of people signed up by ACORN types. I bet you never knew Democrats were so devious. Again impossible to prove fraud cuz these people had a name and an address.

Comment_arrow

St. Swithin

2:51 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Bescher, you tell me I need to get my facts straight, then you don't mention a single fact I got wrong. Do you really believe that Voter ID laws increase participation? You don't think there might be some other factors? You ask for proof that there are eligible voters without ID? Why do you think Wisconsin is spending millions to set up ID stations at DMV offices? Try this article:
http://www.866ourvote.org/state/news?id=0226
The fact is that there is a constant churn of voters lacking ID because of new students, elderly with expired licenses and urban dwellers that don't drive.
If you had actually read my posts you would see I don't have a beef with ID. My beef is with Republicans that lie about why they want the law.

Comment_arrow

St. Swithin

2:58 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Keith,
The kind of voter fraud that these laws supposedly address are very easy to detect. Responsible poll workers scrub lists regularly for changes such as deaths or new residents. If someone tries to use another's ID it gets detected as soon as the real person shows up to vote. It would take a very large effort at multiple polls sites to actually steal an election in this manner. That kind of effort would certainly be spotted. A bag of absentee ballots, OTOH, can be intercepted and changed and it would be very hard to detect.

Your paranoia about ACORN is a FOX-induced delusion. ACORN was targeted by Republicans for the same reason they passed Voter ID laws - to suppress Democratic votes.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

4:06 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

How would poll workers have the authority to 'scrub' voter rolls? Don't you recall the outrage in 2008 when the voter rolls were scrubbed to remove dead people and felons? I can't imagine the reaction should a 'poll worker' try to remove anyone from the voter list.

"In Milwaukee, Marquette University's student newspaper reports that of 1,000 students surveyed, 174 admitted exploiting Wisconsin's permissive registration procedures to vote at least twice, 121 voting in their home state and in Wisconsin, 44 voting twice in Wisconsin, 26 voting three times, 13 voting four or more times."

http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2000-11-19/news/0011170856_1_voting-rolls-voting-age-election-day

Comment_arrow

Keith Best

6:30 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Hey Bill,
I saw possible vote fraud in 2004 when my son registered to vote with a group at Miller Park. This same group (related to ACORN) called the morning of the election to see if my son was going to vote. They have his name and address, if he says he won't have time, what stops them from using his vote. And fraud like this is impossible to prove. That is why we need Photo ID.

Comment_arrow

St. Swithin

10:34 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Cowdung, you ask how voter rolls could be scrubbed and then you talk about when they were scrubbed? What was the question there?
As for your example of Marquette students - that was an example of students lying. See link:http://www.bradblog.com/Docs/PoliticsofVoterFraudFinal.pdf
Money quote:"The Milwaukee County District Attorney said he had no evidence of any student voting more than once."

Comment_arrow

St. Swithin

10:43 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Keith,
You are grasping at straws. You worry hypothetically that some nefarious group will find out about your son and send someone to vote in his place. Well that would be one vote. I don't recall any elections that have come down to 1 vote lately, can you? So in order for such fraud to reliably work this sinister group would have to do this hundreds or thousands of times. Now what are the odds that someone will change their mind and go vote. They arrive at the polling place and discover the fraud. It hits the media and the rest of the fraud is uncovered. Trying to commit this kind of fraud on any sort of large scale will almost certainly be detected. That is why it doesn't happen. If you want to get the most fraud for your buck then you should bribe a court clerk or someone else in charge of the ballots. Finally, do you feel safer about your son's vote now that Voter ID laws are here? So tell me what's to stop that evil organization from taking your son's name and address and making a fake ID to let them vote?

Comment_arrow

CowDung

9:10 am on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Bill:

The point I was trying to make was that 'responsible poll workers' shouldn't be the ones doing the scrubbing. That's a job for the elections board...

Comment_arrow

CowDung

9:15 am on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Bill:

Yes, Keith's comment indicates that one vote could have been cast fraudulently, but do you really believe that the group only made one phone call that day to see if the person they registered was actually going to vote that day?

Comment_arrow

Rick

8:30 am on Saturday, August 27, 2011

St.. How about a little history. 2000... more votes cast in milwuakee that registered voters... 2004... a number documented instances of voter fraud reported by MPD (oh yeah that task force was banned by Dems from observing polls in 2008).

You imply that the Reps didnt go very far... you're right. The Dems refused to even look at closing some holes in the process, The disenfranchisement is nonsense... if thre was even one case... it would be all over the news and you know it.

Lets take it to the next leve and apply some technology so that the same person can't vote absentee and at the polls? How loud would the howels be about "shame" be then?!?

Yolanda Medina

8:44 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

I feel a bit embarrassed for those members of those members of society who feel they need to speak for me (an ethnic minority), the poor, and the elderly. Please give us more credit than that. We are able to live our lives in every other way, be it independently or with the assistance of church members, family, friends or social services. I have an actual, practical idea; If you are indeed so very concerned about those you feel are in danger of disenfranchisement, voicelessness, oppression, etc,, use all of your recalling networks and financial pots that you all have built up and use it for a campaign to actually HELP someone. Take your cue from Senator Zipperer and offer simple, basic, human kindness and assistance. A random act of kindness will do more help in healing divisiveness than political rhetoric. Six other states have the same law we do. Seven other states have a Photo ID or other requirement law, 16 have a list of acceptable ID's law. All of these states cannot possibly be trying to disenfranchise their constituents or there would be a national outcry. Calm down, get your facts straight, and then do some good in this world by helping out your fellowman who may be in need. Be a blessing to someone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Quint Canard

11:33 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

"Take your cue from Senator Zipperer"

You mean make an empty promise to forward people's phone calls?

Comment_arrow

St. Swithin

12:25 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Which facts are those, Yolanda? The fact that no election has been called into question in the last 100 years due to imposters voting? The fact that there are really are people that have a right to vote but don't have the ID needed by the new law?
You mention other states passing these laws. Do these other states all have strong Republicans majorities? What a coincidence. I lived in Georgia when they passed Voter ID. The law was thrown out in the courts three times because of it's blatant violation of civil rights. Even though not a single case of voter fraud could be found in Georgia, the Republicans persevered - tweaking the law the bare minimum they thought would make it legal. At the same time they made absentee balloting much easier - which means it's much easier to abuse.
I actually think showing an ID at the polls is a good idea. But then I also think absentee ballots should be banned. Unlike Republican politicians I actually want to protect the integrity of voting.

Keith Best

8:55 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Why is it wrong to prove you are who you say you are when you vote? Supplied with a name and an address on a voter roll, anyone can vote. What if that name and address were registered by ACORN? This obvious fraud is virtually impossible to prove, yet I have no doubt it exists. That is until now.

What those that call this law racist and disenfranchises minorities are really saying is those people are too stupid to get an ID. That is the reality here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Christensen

9:23 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Apparently if you mention a red herring like ACORN multiple times, does it make your talking point more or less valid?

Rick Vodicka

11:25 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

So, let me get this straight....you need a Photo ID to cash a check, buy alcohol, and buy cigarettes....but somehow we are "suppressing voters" by passing this law?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nat Froiland

12:06 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Cashing a check, buying alcohol, and buying cigarettes, are all privileges. Voting is a right spelled out in the Constitution.

How would you get an ID if you were a 95-year-old who wasn't born in a hospital and never received a birth certificate?

What about a foster child who has never had contact with his/her birth parents?

A homeless person with no address to list on the forms who lives in a "cash economy" - no checks, no credit cards, no bank accounts?

I could go on and on with examples - and these people really do exist, and in large numbers.

But congratulations on eradicating all 10 or so cases of voter fraud from the past decade.

Jeff Klass

12:13 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Love that the libs will rampage on about a law that "saves one life" or "protects one innocent" or other dribble. So then libs, if THIS law stops ONE instance of voter fraud, is it not then worth it?

Seriously - libs, progressives - you know who you are. Move. Out. Of. Wisconsin. You're not wanted here. You are an asembly of entitlement fomenting, teat suckling, anti-Americans that have no place in this state, or dare I say it - this country. You are so enthralled with Western European democracies? GO THERE!

Reply

Jeff Klass

12:13 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Love that the libs will rampage on about a law that "saves one life" or "protects one innocent" or other dribble. So then libs, if THIS law stops ONE instance of voter fraud, is it not then worth it?

Seriously - libs, progressives - you know who you are. Move. Out. Of. Wisconsin. You're not wanted here. You are an asembly of entitlement fomenting, teat suckling, anti-Americans that have no place in this state, or dare I say it - this country. You are so enthralled with Western European democracies? GO THERE!

Reply

Craig

2:10 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

You can get an ID at any DMV center. The ID is often needed for hunting and fishing. Let's just say it how it is: The Libs are upset that illegal aliens will not be allowed to vote.
Well then Damn it, let the Taliban vote too!

Reply

Randy1949

4:19 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

@Jeff Klass -- "Seriously - libs, progressives - you know who you are. Move. Out. Of. Wisconsin. You're not wanted here."

Really? Move out? My family has been here since 1860. How long for you and yours that you should be telling me who and what isn't wanted in this state?

I've been a legally registered voter in the same precinct for forty years, and frankly I shouldn't have to be proving my citizenship, age, or identity a second time simply to vote. And I don't even look like an 'illegal alien' or 'ACORN type'.

Go ahead -- make a person prove all that at the time they register. That seems reasonable to me. This smacks of something else.

Reply

Randy1949

4:23 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Thank you, Senator Zipperer. I'll remember your promise when I first have to spend hours at the DMV with my 87 year old mother getting a state picture ID (she no longer drives but can't quite understand why her former license with the picture shouldn't be ID enough) and in three years when I have to spend extra time at the DMV to renew my drivers license with the new Real ID standards.

Reply

Conservative Digest

9:14 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Voter ID doesn't reduce voting, only illegal voting. There has been fraud for years, mostly in absentee and people coming up from Il. and voting by having people vouch for them.

Reply

Craig

9:47 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

You need a certificate of live birth to get a social security number, which is requirement to get a job. The IRS needs you SS# so they can tax your earnings. So Randy, would you rather produce a social security card? How about we change the law requiring you to be a taxpayer (and work) to have the right to vote?
To claim there in no voter fraud is ignorant; how would we know there was fraud? Without ID there is no way to be sure Joe Blow is really Joe Blow- it could be Jose pretending to be Joe.

Reply

Leave a comment