patching...
Update: Worried about your commute? Check out our traffic map. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Who's Going to Challenge Walker in Potential Recall Election?

Democratic Party of Wisconsin says to plan on a primary to vet candidates, and tap a contender.

 

One large question looming over Wisconsin politics was answered Tuesday with more than 1 million petition signatures submitted to the state in the recall effort against Gov. Scott Walker, but it left another question unanswered: Who would challenge the governor should a recall election happen? 

With no candidates giving the official nod and media reports speculating over a very long list of candidates, Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chairman Mike Tate said at a press conference Tuesday that his party is leaning toward holding a primary.

"You'll have candidates traveling across the state for six or plus weeks," Tate said. "I think it will be a positive campaign focused on Scott Walker's failures."

The Government Accountability Board — the state agency that oversees elections — has 31 days, but says it will go to court to ask for an extension, to vet the more than 1 million petition signatures in the Walker recall effort, 845,000 in the recall effort against Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch and more than 80,000 signatures for four state lawmakers. Meanwhile, the next step for the state Democratic Party is likely to select a candidate.

Poll pegs top candidates to challenge Walker

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, former Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk and former U.S. Rep. David Obey top the list of challengers, according to a Public Policy Forum poll released Tuesday. 

The poll has Barrett pegged as the frontrunner to challenge Walker, with results having him leading Falk 46 to 27 percent and Obey 42 to 30 percent in a potential head-to-head race.

Additionally, the poll said if Barrett didn't throw his hat into the race, Obey would have a better likelihood of being nominated than Falk. The poll also said Barrett has a better name recognition than Falk and that core Democrats prefer Barrett over Falk, Barrett over Obey and Obey over Falk.

Supporters of the recall effort against Walker said they are still hoping former congressmen Russ Feingold and current U.S. Senator Herb Kohl, who both have repeatedly said they are not interested in running, decide to join the race, but they will support nearly any candidate the Democratic Party decides to tap.

Other names floating around in the candidate pool include former U.S. Rep. Ron Kind, Madison firefighter and Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin President Mahlon Mitchell, current Wisconsin Secretary of State Doug La Follette and state Sen. Tim Cullen (D-Janesville).

Supporters prefer Kohl, Feingold

Recall supporter Tom Kojis said he liked to see Obey run against Walker in a gubernatorial recall race.

"He knows how to play the game," Kojis, who is from Green Bay, said. "He's been around forever, he has got a lot of experience.

"Though, he doesn't have a lot of name recognition across the state."

Obey told the Journal Sentinel in October he would consider a run against Walker, but that Barrett and Kohl would make better candidates.

Walker recall supporter Kathy Lefebvere from Green Bay, said she thinks the Democrats need to pick someone who can appeal to the independent voter.

"I don't think candidates like Dave Obey...Kathleen Falk are well known and aren't aggressive," she said. "We need someone aggressive that appeals to a variety of people, and that's Herb Kohl."

Voters' minds already made up, but Barrett is best challenger

Dennis Dresang, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Wisconsin's La Follette School of Public Affairs, said when it comes down to it, it doesn't matter who the Democrats place against Walker because most voters made up their minds about a year ago, amidst Walker introducing ACT 10, or the budget repair bill, which curtailed collective bargaining rights for most public employees.

However, another political science professor, John Adams of Marquette University, said he sees Barrett as the Democrats’ best option at unseating Walker.

“Barrett may have the least baggage among the candidates,” Adams said. “He is known as a nice guy and has statewide name recognition.”

In the November 2010 election, Walker defeated Barrett by about 124,000 votes — or 6 percentage points. Also, in 2002, Barrett, who was then a congressman, ran in the Democratic gubernatorial primary but lost to Jim Doyle, who served two terms as governor.

And, the Journal Sentinel’s Dan Bice reported recently that leaders of two major public employee unions met privately with Barrett to urge him not to run in a recall election.

Adams says unions aren’t backing Barrett because he criticized Walker’s budget repair bill, then used the reforms to balance the City of Milwaukee’s budget.

Barrett was expected to make an announcement in early January, of his plans to run. However, no candidates have officially announced their intentions to run.

Adams said he believes Barrett ultimately will decide against challenging Walker citing a record of flip-flopping.

Asking Barrett to back out, union leaders are backing Falk to run, and believe she would have a better chance to win a race against Walker, the newspaper said.

It's still unclear who would challenge for the lieutenant governor office, should an election occur. 

Cindy Schelcun of Stevens Point said she would like to see Falk and Mitchell challenge for governor and lieutenant governor respectively.

According to a Capital Times report, Falk and Mitchell attended recall events Tuesday together and Falk called it a "good use of my time."

"I hope we can unite behind one candidate so we can get going with the campaign, and hit the ground running again," Schelcun said.

Related Topics: Gov. Scott Walker, Herb Kohl, Kathleen Falk, Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch, Tom Barrett, Wisconsin Politics, Wisconsin Recalls, and recall election

Bob McBride

10:15 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

They're too busy reveling in their hate-fest at present to give it much thought at this point.

Too much bad karma in a Barrett/Walker rematch. If they mistakenly think the state wants a Dem who looks a little like and has the personality of the state mascot, they'll run Obey. If they're smart they'll run Falk.

Reply
Comment_arrow

morninmist

10:00 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

No Democrat will throw their hat in until an election date is set.

To do so would set them up prematurely for the Right wing "hate-fest".

Comment_arrow

morninmist

12:21 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

@ Bob m

I admit, I am surprised she announced her run. Good luck to her and the other candidates. Tate said last week we would have a primary, looks like he is right.

................................................

.................

@shawn

I used the word to throw back at Bob McBride who used it in his post.

.............
shawn

11:02 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

@morninmist-hate-fest?

Comment_arrow

morninmist

12:21 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

@ Bob m
I admit, I am surprised she announced her run. Good luck to her and the other candidates. Tate said last week we would have a primary, looks like he is right.

................................................

.................

@shawn

I used the word to throw back at Bob McBride who used it in his post.

.............
shawn

11:02 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

@morninmist-hate-fest?

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

6:22 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

morninmist
12:21 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
@ Bob m

I admit, I am surprised she announced her run.

*****************

That's what happens when you let the twitter feeds you're following do your thinking for you.

JGK

5:21 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Herb Kohl...Why not John F. Kennedy or Lyndon Johnson.????

JGK

Reply

Joseph

7:17 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Let's see, Barrett wanted to go even further than what Walker did in Act 10, which is what the union goons are trying to recall Walker for. Not to mention, didn't Barrett run for governor in the last election and got his clocked cleaned by Walker?

Reply

shawn

7:20 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

A primary? Is da union actually going to allow this? After all, it was their investment and rallying of their sheeple to get the recall petition accomplished. They will most certainly insist that they get to hand-pick the candidate that maximizes their chance to line their pockets once again.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

7:25 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

You are correct, shawn. And I believe earlier on their was a story about a little "visit" paid to Tom Barrett by a couple of union heads, "asking" him to refrain from running. Their preference, I believe, was Falk.

Comment_arrow

shawn

7:39 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

And they will quip "this is democracy". Keep the laughs coming libs.

country boy

8:08 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The problem with Kohl is he is a has-been corrupt Washington insider. Falk is bought and paid for by the unions. Corruption and pocket lining headed up by the unionistas is where these progressive fools would like to drag the state back into where last two administrations helped bury us. Go Walker!!!!!

Reply

Steve

9:14 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I hear that one of the Koch brothers is going to run. Then after the primary win just give up and let Walker win with another huge majority.

Reply

TOM

9:21 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

FALK WOULD'NT HAVE A CHANCE WHEN PEOPLE STOP AND REALIZE WE AREADY HAVE BEEN FALKED BY DOLE THATS WHY THE DEMS DON'T HAVE A CHANCE WALKER WILL PREVAIL WITH MORE VOTES THAN BEFORE NOW THAT DEAD PEOPL CAN NO LONGER VOTE

Reply
Comment_arrow

morninmist

10:01 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Still full of delusions I see. ha ha

country boy

10:49 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Looks like the union backed Falk just tossed her liberal hat into the arena for Governor. Another loser that backs the union agenda lockstep. Fools paradise. Alas...she will go away when trumped by the silent majority that put Walker in...again! The unionistas have been controlling the states' purse strings long enough. Time for the lefties to face reality...it ain't gonna happen! GO WALKER.!!

Reply

SkinnyDude

12:08 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The dems dont need to decide . The union will tell them who they are running and they will support them as ordered. This was not a grass roots effort . Its a Union run operation about keeping power and warning other states not to mess with there entitlements. Thats all it is about. If we go back it is going to higher taxes and more fiscal insanity. I cant wait to here what the unions have their puppet say about the future agenda for the state lol .Because when they say it ....people will not support it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

stosh

12:28 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I don't believe a free ride for big buisiness, major cuts in education, reductions in your services and cuts in unemployment will be the agenda.

Comment_arrow

Steve

12:30 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

You're still living in 2007 before the socialist recession I see.
As a business owner there is no such thing as a free ride, can you show me the way to this free ride please?

Comment_arrow

Randy1949

12:38 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

@Steve -- 'Socialist recession'? Your ability to rewrite history is truly amazing.

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

12:43 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

stosh, so as long as they don't tell you up front that they're going to do those things, it's not a major problem if they do? You don't really expect that putting Democrats in charge is going to ultimately result in no cuts to education and services (not sure what you're talking about with the "cuts in unemployment" part). Recent history would indicate that that's not the case, both on the state and local level.

I thought one of the key talking points in this recall was that you guys weren't "told" there'd be an alteration to the collective bargaining agreement. I guess if you're told one thing by your own folks, they end up doing another and can convince you they had to reverse course because of the person(s) who held office before them (regardless of how short a period of time that may have been), you're okay with that. That seems to be the scenario you guys buy into over and over.

greg

1:51 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Recall Falk!! .......... To soon?

Reply

SkinnyDude

1:58 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Walker has tied tax credits to business to JOB CREATION . You libs actually think you can promise higher taxes to business and they wil flock to the state to create jobs. That thinking is absolutely clueless. It is exactly the actions taken in the liberal havens of California and Illinios . The result is obvious . Less business , less tax revenue, and than this is followed by more cuts and higher taxes on indivuals. You are clueless if you think that works.
You actually think you can raise taxes and businesses will flock too the state and grow tax revenues to cover your bloated entitlements lol Thats fundamentally Clueless ignorance and I hope the union puppet says what you prescribe as a successful path .

Reply
Comment_arrow

morninmist

3:20 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

why is IL gaining jobs and WI losing jobs (5 months in a row now)?

Comment_arrow

Steve

3:44 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Why is IL raising taxes 65%, fees 100% and still in debt?

Comment_arrow

Say What?

7:10 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Why do Republicans say that raising taxes is a road block to job creation?

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

7:21 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Well I suppose if we tax folks enough so we can have 3 guys cruising around in a snowplow with the blade raised every time we get 1/4" snow instead of just 1 when there's actually something to plow, for instance, I guess it really isn't Say What?

Comment_arrow

Say What?

8:09 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Bob, I can make some stupid a__ comment just like you do, but it isnt getting to the point. Basically, what your side is saying is that taxes kill job creation, then use it in the instance of Illinois as a fall back when they are doing both, raising taxes and creating jobs while places are cutting taxes and losing jobs and using the explanation or "uncertainty" to clarify why. I am not advocating for waste, but you use it to deflect. Maybe we can get another special session together to talk jobs?! What should we do that isn't job related in that session?

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

9:01 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Hey why not another poop in a bag comment? Those were great.

I guess you take seriously what you want to take seriously and I do the same.

I'll tell you what's killing more jobs than anything in this state right now. It's the full scale anti-business riot that began back in Jan/Feb of last year and that's culminating with this idiotic recall. The image burned into the retinas of anyone observing the coverage out of this state is of a pro-business governor and legislature under siege. You can't just choose to ignore that when attempting to make sense of what's happening in WI versus what's happening in IL. I'd weight that much more heavily than taxes at this point.

morninmist

3:18 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Walker administration admits they did not balance the budget.

Get rid of this joker!!

http://thewheelerreport.com/releases/January12/0118/0118richards.pdf

Reply

James R Hoffa

4:03 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Honestly, I think that Herb Kohl would be the only one who'd stand a chance in hell against Walker. But he's not going to run. With every other mentioned potential candidate, the best hope for the Dems would be a third party challenge from a Ron Paul libertarian, such as was responsible for leading Doyle to his first victory over McCallum. But hopefully conservatives will be smarter this time around.

If Barrett is their best shot, he goes down in flames over the facts that the public sector unions don't really want him and that he choose to implement Walker's reforms in the City of Milwaukee, thus making him a hypocrite amongst the base that made the entire recall possible in the first place.

The Dems are currently holding a mighty weak hand.

Walker will prevail by an even larger margin of victory than in 2010, assuring that Wisconsin will once again be a red state in the 2012 presidential election!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

4:03 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

BTW -

I'd like to personally invite everyone to come check out the second install of Hoffa's Retro Cinema Club, featuring a filmmaker spotlight on B-movie veteran Charles Band and a look at his film 'Meridian: Kiss of the Beast' (1990).

It can be accessed here: http://mountpleasant.patch.com/blog_posts/hoffas-retro-cinema-club-film-maker-spotlight-on-charles-band-ft-meridian-kiss-of-the-beast-1990

Cheers!

Mike Miller

5:01 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Barrett had his opportunity and lost. If you review all the candidates, State Sen. Tim Cullen is the best candidate. IMHO

Reply

morninmist

6:02 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

For almost a year we have heard from Walker fans-the lie that Walker balanced the budget. NOW Walker admits to the truth so he can take folks off BadgerCare!!

You can not get any lower than that.

Folks in WI do not like a Governor who LIES!

We also have compassion for people which the Gov has shown he does NOT have!

http://www.politiscoop.com/us-politics/wisconsin-politics/676-busted-scott-walkers-continued-problem-with-the-truth.html

BUSTED: Scott Walker’s Continued Problem With the Truth

Wednesday, 18 January 2012 13:14

Scott Walker Busted in another Lie

BUSTED: Scott Walker’s Continued Problem With the Truth

MADISON –

The admission by Walker’s administration that Wisconsin carries a budget deficit contradicts Scott Walker’s perpetual campaign lie that his “reforms” are working for Wisconsin, and that he has eliminated “a $3.6 billion budget deficit without raising taxes.”

“The jig is up,” Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chair Mike Tate said Wednesday. “Scott Walker is either lying to preserve his own political career, or he is lying to kick tens of thousands of Wisconsinites off of health care to pay for his $2 billion tax giveaway to wealthy special interests. One million strong Wisconsinites have already forced Scott Walker’s recall, but as news continues to emerge about the dishonest lengths Scott Walker will go to to finance his rent-to-own government, their ranks will surely grow.”

Reply
Comment_arrow

shawn

6:16 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Proof that the dems will believe anything their liberal messiahs and union toadies tell them.

Comment_arrow

TOM

6:30 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

morningpist you musta drank alot of the union tea ! if bull$hit was music your post would be a brass band .walker will prevail because he is good at culling leeches and parasites from the high taxes that chase away bussiness from this state

TOM

6:42 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I GUESS A GOOD WAY TO PAY FOR THIS FOOLISHNESS IS FOR SCOTT WALKER AFTER HE IS REELECTED TO CARVE SOME MORE FAT OFF THE BONES OF SOME OTHER PARASITES LEECHING OFF THE TAXPAYERS HE WILL PREVAIL WITH MORE VOTES NOW THAT DEAD PEOPLE AND NON RESIDENTS CAN NO LONGER VOTE IN THIS STATE

Reply
Comment_arrow

Say What?

7:13 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I remember when there were 100's of thousands of dead non residents voting in this state, swaying elections completely out of skew. It was awful. Now, I can't remember where I put that source...

clark

7:20 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

How about 'Here is a bus ride and a free meal. Please come and vote for our candidate the union boss picked'. Remember that one SayWhat?

Reply
Comment_arrow

morninmist

7:39 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

clark
Please remember that the DA did not bring charges. Bringing up that event makes you look stupid as you try to make people believe it was true. You are the foolish one as you fool no one with your old "news"

Probably even Say What does not want to look as stupid as you just did (although based on his comment above you both look stupid!)

Comment_arrow

the 'sha guy

8:17 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

Just because a DA did not bring charges does not mean something is not true.

Perhaps Falk will just have a lot of BBQ's around the state and the only thing you need to bring to get free food is an absentee ballot?

Comment_arrow

morninmist

9:54 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

well sha
Your proclamation hold true for the TeaGOP volunteers who got free gifts also who also had a complaint lodged against them.
Cheers

....................
the 'sha guy

8:17 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

Just because a DA did not bring charges does not mean something is not true.

TOM

7:53 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

THE DA'S IN THEIR POCKET WE FLUSHED DOLE'S TOILET BUT IT STILL NEEDS A CLEANING

Reply

TOM

8:24 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

IT'S GOING TO TAKE YEARS TO RECOVER FROM DOYLES PIRACY OF THE TAXPAYER> THE STATE COULD NOT RECOVER FROM ANOTHER DEMOCRATIC FALKING .

Reply
Comment_arrow

morninmist

7:04 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

Walker is up to his neck in a scandal and you are distracting by talking about Doyle!! Nobody cares about Doyle anymore. He is gone. Get it!

http://www.politicususa.com/en/wisconsin-gop-scott-walker-lawyer

...Meanwhile, Walker claims he won’t be charging the state for his legal fees. It may be that if he uses public money, the people might have a right to information that he would prefer be kept secret. It looks like Walker’s national fundraising probably had less to do with his recall than it does with establishing a legal defense fund. After all, he has already paid the law firm that includes his attorney at least $100,000.00

The lawyers Walker hired specialize in real estate and and complex criminal law:,,,

Scott Walker Lawyers Up as John Doe Investigation Stalks Wisconsin GOP

Roger Dodger

4:20 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012

wow some of the dumbest comments ever on here...

Reply

Keith Best

4:22 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

Vinehout? Falk? Barrett? Seriously?
Hahahahaha!

Reply

Born Free

8:38 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012

SOVIET UNIONISM IS UNAMERICAN

Reply

Leave a comment