patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Waukesha County Board Approves Controversial Resolution

Before the meeting, protestors marched along Moreland Boulevard.

 

Protesters who braved a thunderstorm Tuesday night were disappointed after the Waukesha County Board approved a resolution, 19 to 3, supporting state legislation that eliminates collective bargaining for employees' benefits.

The protesters — teachers, social workers, private citizens, members of various unions and at least one police officer — met outside the courthouse and marched along Moreland Boulevard in the cold, driving rain for about a half an hour prior to the County Board meeting.

Inside the courthouse and after being cleared by security, more than 100 people filled the county board room.

In the board room, the crowd was quiet until after the board approved the resolution. After that happened, most of the audience got up to leave, prompted by one man saying, “Let’s all walk. Let’s take a stroll.”

On the way out, another man said, “Shame, shame, shame. You heard everybody speak here and you just ignored all of them.” County Board Chairman Jim Dwyer informed him he was out of order.

Earlier in the evening, Dwyer began the meeting by explaining that each speaker would have two minutes to speak during the public comment portion of the meeting and that clapping, cheering, booing or making noise would not be tolerated.

All except one of the audience members who addressed the board spoke against the resolution. 

The first member to speak was Joel Gaughan from SOPHIA, an interfaith organization that addresses social injustices in Waukesha County.

Gaughan said that the organization's concerns echo those of faith and religious leaders like Catholic Archbishop Listecki, Evangelical Lutheran Church of America Bishop Burnside, Rabbi Biatch and Methodist Bishop Lee who have spoken out against the policy changes.

He asked county board supervisors to encourage the state legislature to develop a budget bill that will be more friendly to those whose lives are most affected by things like BadgerCare, public schools and transportation and other locally-provided services.

“All of our various faith traditions teach that the measure of a society is based on how we treat the most vulnerable in the community,” Gaughan said, adding that they believe in the ideal of shared sacrifice for the good of the community.

Terry Ullsperger, from Menomonee Falls, told the board he was concerned that that the proposed budget repair bill restricts the county’s ability to raise taxes to balance the county’s budget.

He said that the county’s budget would “end up being balanced on the backs of the working people,” with the result being that “we’re going to lose community services.

“I’d rather pay more taxes than lose the services we have now,” Ullsperger said.

Linda Senger, a social worker for Waukesha County, said as state expectations for her profession continue to rise, they are expected to do more with less. She’s concerned about the workers but also the people she works with in the community, the poor and the working poor.

“If those benefits are stripped from the people we work with, I predict we’re going to see an increase in foster care rates and it’ll come back as a fiscal matter for this county,” she said.

Waukesha resident Tom Merschdorf, the only member of the audience to speak in favor of the resolution, commended the board for proposing it.

He said that as someone who works in the private sector, he’s been sacrificing for a number of years now, experiencing rising insurance costs and the elimination of his pension, and it seems that his friends in the public sector haven’t been sacrificing as much.

“Just because I’m not a public employee doesn’t mean I’m not a member of the working class,” he said. We’re “getting one side of the story here and I think that’s a shame.”

New Berlin resident John Hebert, a county employee, said that the budget repair bill is going to make “Main Street bleed.”

He said that in his case it will cost him $400 a month. He hypothesized that if the average cost to a public sector employee is $300 a month and there are 300,000 public sector employees in the state of Wisconsin, per year $1.8 billion would be pulled out of the state’s economy.

County Board Supervisor Pat Haukohl, of Brookfield, said when the executive committee first considered the resolution, much discussion centered on the budget repair bill, the impact of which was unknown at the time.

Haukohl said that she can’t support the entire budget repair bill, as the resolution originally read, because she thinks some of the effects “are very negative on our state.”

However, she said she believes there “needs to be some control on collective bargaining.”

“I do endorse our employees.… I do believe that we as a county will continue to work with you to work through all the problems and issues,” Haukohl said.

County Board Supervisor Robert Hutton, of Sussex, proposed an amendment to the original resolution, changing the parts that reference “Governor Walker’s budget repair bill” to “state legislation.”

He said that in proposing this resolution, there was not wholesale support for the budget repair bill. He said there was great concern among the board about how they are going to protect county services.

“It would pain me to see us as a county having a very difficult time fulfilling programs that many of our residents have come to depend on in this county,” he said, noting there will be some tough decisions in coming months.

County Board Supervisor Duane Paulson spoke against approving the resolution, acknowledging that he has been in leadership position in public and private unions. He proposed that the board table the resolution, but that vote failed. 

Related Topics: Collective Bargaining, Unions, and waukesha
Do you support an end to collective bargaining for public employees? Tell us in the comments.

Diane

10:57 am on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

We support RESTRICTED collective bargaining. @John Hebert - wont the billion $ you quoted be a savings to the taxpayer (including you?) or available for other services and not actually taken OUT of the economy?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

6:06 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Diane,
Good question.
The answer is -
Up to 400,000 Wisconsin public service employees will have about $5,000 each less to spend in Wisconsin.
Instead this two billion dollars will go to health insurance companies and the investment companies that manage pension plans.
Thus two billion less will reduce our economy and participate still more layoffs.
As important this will weaken already stressed Wisconsin businesses.
All this also increases Wisconsin's contributions to unemployment insurance and decreases tax collections.
It's a lose, lose, lose, lose, lose all around situation.
Walker simply does not understand economics and his bill in reality is the - "Sink Wisconsin Bill".

Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

12:12 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Here's a good example of the real future's outlook.
If you really want to know why it's important to recall the Republican State Senators and -
- Have a more balanced Wisconsin Government &
- Eliminate the Puppet Government attitude -
Begin trading by reading this article in Patch.
And keep your eyes open to see why I call Walker's wrecking ball bill the "Sink Wisconsin Bill"
http://waukesha.patch.com/articles/proposed-state-budget-to-impact-waukesha-library

Eric S

11:50 am on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

I am a Lutheran pastor and I applaud the Waukesha County Board. It is a social INjustice to continue to spend money you don't have on public sector employee pensions, while private sector employees are getting laid off. Sadly, collective bargaining has been abused to the detriment of the average tax payer. There are lots of Lutherans who don't buy into the "social gospel", which is no gospel at all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

1:50 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Pastor Eric,
Where would we be if we still had 6 1/2 day work weeks, and child labor, and no minimum wage laws?
I bet you would have much more work in your field helping the increased number of poor people.
Do you truly think Christ would want to end collective bargaining and go back to the working conditions of 1800's and early 1900's?
Did you read how may people were shot to death because all they asked for were better working conditions and a little more money to support a family???
Pastor, what planet have you been living on??

Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

12:21 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Pastor Eric,
I'm happy you have strong beliefs.
But please leave them out of the economic issues that are wrecking America.
And don't try to corrupt my beliefs.

All I know is Christ
- was a Jewish carpenter,
- he tended to the needy with food & shelter,
- and today, most likely would be a member of the Carpenters Union.

And, Jesus would not support Walker's proposal to reduce -
Health care for the needy.
Or transportation for the needy.
Or good shelter for the needy.

And he would sure make sure they are adequately fed.

Why?
Because this is what Christ did.
The very opposite of Walker.
Pastor, - Does this change your opinion of Walker?
If not, you're helpless and need Christ's help.
Actually you can do it yourself by reading what he really did, and apply it to today's situations.
If your beliefs are really as strong as you profess?preach, you would abandon Walker and his Fitzgerald & Koch goons.
eb

M Nelson

3:22 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Our public employees did not cause our state's deficit, the current recession did. Our state pays a fair wage with fair benefits--many would do better in the private sector. If we're not willing to compensate workers adequately, services will indeed suffer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark S

5:31 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

OR..... People could appreciate doing their jobs and services would become better. Then we could all live happily ever after!!!

Reagan's Disciple

3:44 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Eugene,

Surely you are smarter than what you write. At least I hope so, but if I read you correctly, if not for collective bargaining people would still be being shot to death for asking for better shop conditions? There were people with both excellent pay and working conditions before any unions appeared in the US, so how do you explain that. There were people who worked only 5 days a week before unions. How do you explain that? In fact, there are still many people in jobs with no union protections that have excellent pay and working conditions and work 5 days per week.

To credit every positive improvement in the workplace during the last 150 years to unions and collective bargaining is disingenuous and quite honestly sounds like your either reading from your local 344 newsletter or having too many breakfast meals with the union stewards.

I was in a union and have seen this from both sides. Don't kid yourself and please try to be honest with other readers who see this. The unions buy as many candidates as any corporation does. In the end, corporations and unions can spend money, but it still is up to an individual to coherently and intelligently decipher the overload of information they are provided and go and vote. They did this in November and as Obama so eloquently stated when he won, "elections have consequences."

Reply

Reagan's Disciple

4:02 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Does everyone notice the huge disconnect with the private sector? Most, if not all of the private sector would consider the public employee benefit package substantially more than just "fair." Perhaps these public individuals should see what the private sector has to offer if they do not like the proposed self contributions to their benefits?

If you are correct (which I don't believe to be the case) the market will take over and taxpayers will be forced to pay more to these public employees in wages and benefits. However, with 9% unemployment, there will be a line of more than qualified people waiting to fill ANY job vacancy available in the public arena.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

12:25 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Mr hide behind the nomenclature Reagan's Disciple,
Pres Reagan, your hero, raised taxes in 6 of the 8 years he was President?
Why?
Get on the internet for educational purposes and you will find he said he had to raise taxes to keep the nation's deficit under control.

Eugene Barufkin

6:18 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Mr Reagan Disciple,
1. can you prove that more than 5% of USA's population worked less than 60 hours a week before 1915?
History documents that this was reality.
And of course child labor which you ignored.
And that those that did not live on farms and worked 80+ hours a week, lived in squalor in factory towns and big city tenements.

2. Up to 400,000 Wisconsin public service employees will have about $5,000 each less to spend in Wisconsin.
Instead this two billion dollars will go to health insurance companies and the investment companies that manage pension plans.
Thus two billion less will reduce our economy and participate still more layoffs.
As important, this will weaken already stressed Wisconsin businesses.
All this also increases Wisconsin's contributions to unemployment insurance and decreases tax collections.
It's a lose, lose, lose, lose, lose all around situation.
Walker simply does not understand economics and his bill in reality is the - "Sink Wisconsin Bill".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

1:42 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Mr Reagan's Disciple, You have a long road ahead to become better educated.
Here's another for you I remembered when studying history -
The Westmoreland County Coal Strike of 1910–1911 was a strike by coal miners represented by the United Mine Workers of America. The strike is also known as the "Slovak strike" because about 70 percent of the miners were Slovak immigrants.[1]

It began in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, on March 9, 1910, and ended on July 1, 1911. At its height, the strike encompassed 65 mines and 15,000 coal miners.[1][2] Sixteen people were killed during the strike, nearly all of them striking miners or members of their families.[3] The strike ended in a defeat for the union.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westmoreland_County_Coal_Strike_of_1910%E2%80%931911

Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

8:18 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Eugene,

It is you who apparently does not understand.

Eugene stated "Instead this two billion dollars will go to health insurance companies and the investment companies that manage pension plans.
Thus two billion less will reduce our economy and participate still more layoffs."

Is that an untrue statement, or do you not understand the bill. It is one or the other.

Diane

9:08 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

@Eugene - city, county, state, and federal governments cannot continue to sustain the current union packages. I live with a budget and it is time that governments get spending under control. The unions continue to push through extensions on current contracts - with employees now paying a portion of health insurance and pension, but it is not enough. Employees still dont have the option of opting out of the union and they they continue to pay union dues. Mercury Marine and Harley both asked for concessions from the union and got them; the alternative was move out of Wisconsin to do business. How have the unions helped the auto industry in Detroit area?????

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

1:34 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Diane, you like Walker's brother should have applied for a state job, then you would not be complaining.

Reagan's Disciple

9:50 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

@Eugene -
1. How about you prove to me that 95% of US workers did work more than 60 hours per week in 1915? (BTW- I never stated such a statistic, rather spoke in more general terms, so now you can try to back up your own ludicrous statements on shootings, your knowledge of what Christ would want etc...)

2. It is also apparently you who does not at all understand this bill. The insurance and investment companies will not be receiving anymore money at all. None!!! Instead, the money (same amount) they currently receive will just come from another source (the public employee) instead of the previous source (taxpayer) . The taxpayer has been footing the whole cost of the public health care and pension plan and now the public employee is just being asked to contribute a small percentage towards their own benefits(how horrific!). The money you claim will be taken out of the pocket of the public employee is actually just staying in the pocket of the taxpayer. There is no loss of economic dollars here to health care or investment companies.

It is really not even possible to have a discussion unless people can understand the basic principles, facts and concepts of this BRB which by reading your post, you seem to not fully grasp.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

1:26 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Mr Reagan's Disciple,
You sure are American history ignorant.
Here is one of many strikes where many were killed.
The Pressed Steel Car Strike of 1909, also known as the "1909 McKees Rocks Strike," was an American labor strike which lasted from July 13 through September 8. The walkout drew national attention when it climaxed on Sunday August 22 in a bloody battle between strikers, private security agents, and the Pennsylvania State Police. At least 12 people died, and perhaps as many as 26.[1] The strike was the major industrial labor dispute in the Pittsburgh district after the famous 1892 Homestead Strike and was a precursor to the Great Steel Strike of 1919.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_strikes#1850.E2.80.931899
If you go here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_strikes#1850.E2.80.931899 you will find many more such situations.
When you do, you will find the weekly hours worked data in the area where the strike issues are noted.
Good luck with your continuing education of fact the Right does not want you know.
Is there anything else I can help you with?

Jack P

12:57 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

The budget didn't get busted overnight. We shouldn't try to fix it overnight and especially by degrading our educational system or hurting our senior citizens as Walker's plan does. When educational programs get cut, class sizes increased, and teachers are laid off, only a fool would say that education will not suffer. A child has but 12 years to get through school. When a program gets cut a child is cheated for life. It may be you who pays the ultimate price of DEATH because that was the child who would have found the cure for your cancer. But he wasn't motivated to to go on in school because the program that would have sparked his interest was CUT so that we could give a tax break to billionaires and corporations that are sitting on trillions and not hiring because there are no buyers who can afford to buy their products . The Republicans tried the trickle down theory now for more than 10 years and look at the mess we are in. It is not the children or the teachers that caused this mess. We shouldn't expect them to bail us out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

1:33 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Jack P,
You omitted an important fact -
Walker's first actions were to reduce Wisconsin's treasury income by 117 million dollars a year by providing tax cuts to those who don't need them.
Then he had the nerve to tell us the state has a 137 million dollar short fall.
Like you said, when you cheat on education you loose.
Walker could not do simple math and see the shortfall would only be 20 million if the tax cuts were not made.

Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

8:30 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Wow, now you guys are saying that we may die because of the increased contribution amounts. My best guess is that I am dying at some point regardless of whether public employees contribute 6% or not.

Apparently you do not understand how budgets work. No, it was not broke overnight, but YES you do need to fix it overnight. You can only borrow and steal money from other funds for so long before you find yourself in a hole with no way out. Kind of like the homeowner who borrows, spends and charges. It wasn't a problem that came up overnight, but built itself up over years. One day the family has to look at itself and say, "we either need to file bankruptcy or starting today we will need to make some sacrifices in our spending & purchasing habits." As a state, we have hit that day.

Also, please show one company that is sitting on "Trillions" of dollars and not hiring. Or even just sitting on trillions of dollars. (your words, not mine) Or is this just another inflammatory statement used by the union bosses to rile up the shop?

Paul S

7:44 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Well Eugene, it appears to me that you have omitted something to. Who gave the authority to you to decide that I don't need my money?
I have earned all that I have and believe that it is on theft for someone else spend my money in a manner that I don't agree with.
All you libs scream about greed... lets not forget about avarice as you are tossing all those epithets about...

Reply

Elaine Blonigen

8:05 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

If money was the answer for everything why after generations of throwing money at the schools are there so many kids leaving school without the basic reading, writing & math skills? Money isn't the answer. We need to look further. I'm very pleased to hear that Governor Walker wants an assessment of their skills at third the grade level before we "pass" them. The really great teachers (and I know we have them) won't let money or the lack of money get in the way of doing what they say the love to do. If they don't love it any longer it's time for them to move to our world, the private sector & see it through our prisms of reality. There are so many young enthusiastic folks just waiting to fill those positions.

Private sector workers have been feeling the "pinch/ouch" for several years now. My husbands wages have been frozen for 3 years now and we pay 30% toward our health insurance. Instead of complaining, we feel grateful every day that he still has a job. We've had to adjust our lifestyle to a reduced income so I'm sure the public workers will find a way. They still have job with Cadillac pension and health benefits. I hope they find a way to be just as grateful.

Wisconsin is broke just like so many other states & so many other families. If collective bargaining is so great, then the unions won't be afraid that these teachers will now have a choice to pay or not pay union dues. Let's all wait to see what happens when they have that choice?

Reply

Reagan's Disciple

8:17 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Eugene,

You also have not proved any of your initial claims that all of these improvements are solely from unions. Were there strikes in the 1800s & 1900s? Absolutely. Would people still be shot today if it were not for unions, No. Society has evolved to the point this is not acceptable. In fact, it was not even acceptable back then which is why it is a historically significant event during the time period.

Here are the claims that you have stated which have not been backed up.

1. 95% of US workers were working more than 60 hours per week?
2. What is Christ's opinion on collective bargaining?
3. You also never even address you basic mis-understanding of funding for this bill in that you believe the money is being taken from the workers to give MORE money to the health care and investment companies. This is simply not true.

4. The point of my argument was really a causation vs. correlation situation. You have tried to credit every improvement in the workplace to unions without anything to factually back this up. It is to the point were you even cite your opinion of what you believe Christ wants.

See the radical disconnect? Think about what you are saying.

Even if you are correct on everything positive that you directly correlate to unions, the unions you are referring to are PRIVATE sector unions, not public employee unions. There is a difference.

Reply

Elaine Blonigen

8:28 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Bravo to the Waukesha County Board for standing up to the dissenting voices. They have to live with the reality of less money like those of us in the Private Sector. We all have to make decisions about where we are going to cut our budgets and we don't like it either.

But we have to count our blessings .. stop counting the hardships. My husband's wages have been frozen for 3 years now and our healthcare costs continue to rise. We contribute 30% and don't get to take our private insurance with us when he retires. We remain grateful that he still has a job and I pray these Public Unions workers will do the same.

Will the public union workers come and protest for my husband and all of those like him? Didn't think so.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

2:57 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Yes Elaine, Bravo for supporting the reduction of Wisconsin's economy by two billion dollars per year and further exacerbating the job loss problems in WI.
Yes, applaud going backwards on the jobs issue, just like Walker's backwards thinking.

Jack P

11:18 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

If Walker was so interested in balancing the budget, why did he give a 117 million tax break to the corporations. When you factor that amount across the corporate scene, it is a puny amount that won't make any business move here or leave the state. If you gave it all to one company, they could hardly build a new facility with it. For those of you who think you have suffered by having a pay freeze for three years, I can more than empathize with you. I took a 65% pay cut , lost my pension and ESOP stock through a contrived bankruptcy. I don't need lectures about sacrifice nor do I need an MBA to know that big business will do what ever it wants in the Walker environment- and get away with it. Your 3yr pay freeze will become a pay cut as they compare you to the public sector in the not too distant future. It's called ratcheting. What you are really doing is helping them to cut your pay sooner rather than later. If you don't believe that, you deserve what you get. And don't forget that teachers have been on a pay restriction since the Tommy Thompson days and the institution of the QEO. They couldn't get pay raises commensurate with the private sector, so they negotiated for the benefits which you envy instead. They paid for those benefits in lower salaries. Instead of using the public sector to negotiate your futures up, you have chosen to believe the corporate propaganda and ratchet the public sector down. What goes around will come around.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

11:55 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Was that found on page 3 or 4 of your monthly newsletter?

Jim B

11:34 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

The smoke-screen has worked, and Walker and his leftenants have the working class pitted against the working class. Why is it that people think because somebody elses benefit package is "better" than theirs we should cut the better pakage? Why aren't we asking why the big corporations with record profits have been steadily reducing the pensions and benefits of the public sector? Why can't you people look past the smokescreen and see what is really happening? This has nothing to do with the budget at all - it's about power and money - and how much the Republicans can transfer to the rich and multi-national/state corporations from ALL of the middle class.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diane

12:03 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Jim B - both Harley-Davidson and Mercury Marine needed concessions from unions to stay in businees. Harley no longer offers pension benefits to new hires. IT IS ABOUT BALANCING BUDGETS AND NOT SPENDING MORE THAN YOUR INCOME - JUST LIKE YOU AND I DO.

JRod

12:04 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Reagan's Disciple. FYI, Reagan once said, "Where unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost". PS. Even though you claim that Eugene is uneducated, I believe you might be the one being schooled in history and knowledge.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

9:37 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

FYI - Labor icon George Meany once said
""It is impossible to bargain collectively with the government. Unions, as well as employers, would vastly prefer to have even Government regulation of labor-management relations reduced to a minimum consistent with the protection of the public welfare..."

Diane

12:10 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@JRod. What freedom is there when employees cant opt of the union? What freedom is there when union supporters boycott Kwik Trip and block the entrances to Sendick grocery stores?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

3:10 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Diane, If you don't like the system - You have the free choice to go to another gas station and super market.
Or even to live in another country like Mexico.
Me, I choose to stay here and improve the system, and not kick it down by bankruptcy, while the wealthy get wealthier.

Jack P

1:06 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

If big business can get the politicians to destroy the public school system it will insure them of a continuous supply of uneducated cheap labor. So just go on believing the Republican party line. What you don't pay in taxes you will double or triple the amount to send your kids to private schools or you already do and to heck with those who can not afford to do that! Don't forget it is all about ME, ME, ME.

Reply

Diane

1:23 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Jack. Good teachers will continue to teach - just without the hefty health care premiums and pensions paid by the taxpayer - you included.

Reply

Jack P

1:53 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Diane
So I guess what you are saying is that if we all like our jobs we will all eventually be willing to work for the robber barons for nothing . There is something wrong in our society when we are willing to pay a salesman, who doesn't need a college degree just a gift to gab, to sell widgets more than we are willing to spend to formulate the minds of our children.

Reply

Reagan's Disciple

2:01 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Jrod,

Please keep making stuff up. Please show me where did I say Eugene was uneducated? He clearly does not have a grasp on the funding for the BRB or where the monies are going by his own admission. The lefties ability to just make things up out of nowhere although astounding, is not surprising.

As for schooling... Reagan made that statement (when he wasn't even President) in reference to supporting the working people in...... communist POLAND. Furthermore, public unions are not "free," as they cost the taxpayers money and employees are NOT able to decide whether or not they want to belong to said union. Employees are forced to join public unions.

If you want to discuss what people think about public sector unions, look at FDR or former labor leader and first AFL-CIO president George Meany and lets discuss their thoughts too.

Keep looking for more information in your next monthly newsletter too! Those things really keep "da union" members riled up (I used to receive one) and has them posting tidbits on sites like this that are easily knocked out of the park by anyone with even a modicum of common sense and/or knowledge.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine Blonigen

2:26 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Bravo for Reagan's Disciple. Couldn't have said it better myself.
But I still think Bob Chanin speaks for all Public Union Workers: “Despite what some among us would like to believe it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.”

Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

2:50 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Mr Reagan's Disciple,
1. How about a real name. What are you hiding?
2. Reducing each public service employee's income by $4,000 to $5,000 each year, which goes to a businesses that does not sell a product or service on Main Street, is actually $4,000 to $5,000 not spent for gas, food, new items for their homes, entertainment etc . Thus it DIRECTLY removes about two billion dollars from Wisconsin's Main Street economy each year.
What don't you understand about this simple math?
What don't you see????
It's not what you don't see, it's what you don't want to admit.
. Walker screwed up and this two billion dollar loss to Wisconsin's economy each year will weaken already stressed business and incur even more layoffs.
Walker's actions are sending Wisconsin's job outlook backwards.
Just like his thinking, which is backwards.
Maybe some day he will finish school, if does not get expelled a second time.
As reported, he lied to his yet to be wife about his problems at Marquette.

Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

3:23 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Eugene,

1. A real name like "Jack P, Jrod, or M Nelson?"
2. What I do not see is your flawed logic. There is not a 2 billion dollar loss, so please quit crying wolf.

To answer question 2 there needs to be the basic understanding that the state has a budget shortfall that needs to be covered. With that in mind, two ways to fund that shortage are 1. Ask public employees to contribute money to their own personal health care and pension plan, or 2. Raise taxes to cover the shortage. (yes there could be other ways too)

If you choose 1 (and I'll use your numbers even though I am not sure about their validity) 2 billion dollars will be paid by the public sector employees. Therefore, that same 2 billion will NOT be taken out of the private sector in the form of increase taxes.

Again, there is not 2 billion (your number) being taken out of the economy. The money is just coming from another source.

What a surprise the you end your post with more unsubstantiated claims about Walker. What happened to the "New Civility" that President Obama recently called for?

Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

9:46 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Eugene, why the quest for people's names??? So you can alert the union thugs to our whereabouts?? Anyone who's seen some of the videos from madison and at rallys around the country, heard about the death threats and other threats to legislators and bloggers, seen the intimidation tactics of the union folks, isn't going to put their real anme on here and come out against the thugs. Oh yeah, let's not forget the possibility of retribution from some of the more radical teachers on our kids.

Diane

2:14 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Jack I did not know that salesmen make more than what teachers do in 9 months with paid health insurance and pensions. Please point me to a listing of salaries of salesmen. You are right that you dont need a college degree to do be a salesman; neither do you need a college degree to teach. Governments need to control spending and live with a budget - like the rest of the population. Can you spend more than your income? I know I cant.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

3:05 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

So raise taxes on the income of people who can afford them.
Like everyone with incomes greater then $500,000.
Diane, are you one of these people?
I bet not.
So why should care if they help out people like yourself?
And possibly your children to get a better education, or pay fireman good wages who may have to save your house someday, or policeman who you may need some day to help you & your family.
Why do care if upper income people pay greater taxes??????

Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

9:55 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Eugene, in 2008, the top 1% of all earners ( $380,354 AGI & over) already paid 38.02% of all FederalIncome taxes. You don't think these folks are already paying more than their fair share??? A lot of those are the folks that create jobs for us. I doubt many public sector union members have created many jobs for others.

BTW, on a state level, those are the folks that move elsewhere when you keep raising their state taxes. Ask Maryland how that works out.

Jack P

2:30 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Diane
You do need 4 year degree to teach in public schools and continuing education through a Masters degree equivalent to keep your teaching license in most states.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

3:27 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

They also force you to be a union member too. If you want to talk about rights, how about the right to work without being forced to join a union.

Diane

3:05 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Jack - yes, that is the present requirement. But here are people who can teach who do not have degrees - and they will teach without the complaining that we hear from the current teachers.

Reply

Diane

3:07 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Eugene. It will be 2 billion that taxpayers will have in their pockets to boost the economy and help those whose services may be cut.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

4:55 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Wrong.
WI's largest tax problem - property taxes, 10th highest in 50.
Many states with higher property taxes are those with NO income tax.
Why? They have to get money from some place for roads, schools, police, fire fighting, judicial systems and so on.
Here's an out line of the Wisconsin problem.
Using North Carolina for comparison, (data from Wisconsin's Blue Book)
WI's population is 38.5% less than North Carolina.
But WI has 424 school districts and 3,120 government units.
But North Carolina, with 38.5% greater population, has only;
122 school districts and 963 government units.
-
Interestingly WI spends $10,367 per student and North Carolina $7,878, 24% less.
And ACT scores, WI, 22.3 & NC, 22.5.
-
These few statistics show Wisconsin has to many high income, upper administration positions in school districts, counties, towns, villages and cities.
At least five of our small counties could be eliminated. And fewer buildings would be needed.
All by mergers that would reduce property taxes.

Diane

3:10 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Eugene - no one should have to pay higher taxes - not even you - if spending is controlled and cut back.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

4:57 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Previous comment continued -
An education by-product - High schools with at least 500 students with the opportunity to offer more elective math science & language subjects, without increasing costs.
-
It's easy to envision, taking merger actions in Wisconsin will lower property taxes and provide more money for education.
-
Another school cost saver Wisconsin should adopt from North Carolina.
NC's state-wide school bus system. Rather than each school dist negotiating contracts, purchase fuel and buses & worry about spare buses, NC uses the state's purchasing power to keep costs low.
-
I would like to see you and others organize to fix a problem we can really touch and influence.
-
We have very little control over most other problems.

JRod

3:17 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Diane, I don't think a boycotting is contrary to freedom but a way to express freedom. We do it to plenty of countries we think are not fair to their own people. If there were a few people blocking the entrance at Sendik's, I think you are correct. Where I don't think you are correct is by using the actions of a few to make a point that applies to thousands of others.

Reply

Jack P

3:29 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Diane
There will not be 2 billion going into the economy as your taxes will not be cut and it will not be in your pocket to put in the economy.
As for non educated teachers - Are you saying you would get on an airliner with someone at the controls who wanted to be a pilot but never went through the years of training most pilots have? Because that is what I'm hearing. Do you really want that for your child's education or just someone else's.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

3:41 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

There is a shortage and something had to be done to cover the shortfall. Thus the term "Budget REPAIR Bill." You are correct in that taxes will not be cut. However, the decision was never about cutting taxes rather it was about higher contributions by public employees and RAISING taxes on everyone. So yes, the money does stay in the pocket of the taxpayer as Diane states and there is not 2 billion taken out of the economy.

Diane

3:30 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@ Eugene I have the CHOICE to shop where I want - Kwik Trip and Sendick's. I am glad that the police were called to New Berlin and that someone was arrested at another Sendick's the next day.

I am also happy to read that County Board Chairman Jim Dwyer took control of the Waukesha County Board meeting began the meeting by explaining that each speaker would have two minutes to speak during the public comment portion of the meeting and that clapping, cheering, booing or making noise would not be tolerated.

Reply

Diane

3:56 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@ Jack Why bring pilots into the conversation unless it is to say that pilots could teach in a classroom of students which is my point that people OTHER THAN TEACHERS WITH LICENSES are capable of teaching. I remember when everyone was afraid to let the controllers go on strike...... didnt others take over?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

4:03 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

I know plenty of people that can teach who do not have a teaching licenses but I also know plenty of people who can not teach and who do not have a teaching licenses....

Funny, I also know teachers that can teach who have teaching licenses but I also know teachers who can not teach who have teacher licenses.

Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

4:26 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Diane I bet your to young to remember that military air controllers had to be brought in.
And then it took many years to minimally train new civilian air controllers.
Also that was the era of many commercial plane accidents.
Read what just happened at Reagan in DC.
The Controllers still say, because of the loss of highly experienced controllers in the 80's, the skys are not as safe as before Reagan fired them.
This is a highly skilled area where experience really is a factor.

Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

4:39 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Some military ATC were brought in. Other vacancies were filled by supervisors, new hires and the 1300+ who actually broke the picket line and performed their legally obligated duties per their contract.

One of the reasons they were striking was that they wanted a 32 hour work week.

Diane

4:07 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@regan's. You are right. A license does not make a good teacher.

Reply

Eugene Barufkin

5:00 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Re 32 hour week.
Again, look what just happened at Reagan in DC.
Controller fell asleep.
And because of cut backs, only one was on duty.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine Blonigen

5:26 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

The investigation into the "sleeping" controller hasn't been completed. We don't know for a fact that is was because of cut backs. He was working a normal 8 hour shift....maybe he should have gotton more sleep before reporting to work. They are Federal employees and if it was a result of cut backs that's on the Federal Gov't ..

Eugene Barufkin

5:10 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

There exists a group of wealthy individuals that are putting Public Good over Individual Greed.
- They state:
Over the last 30 years, economic policies in America have slowly but surely shifted to disproportionately benefit the nation’s top earners.
Wealth for the Common Good, which represents many of these individuals, was organized to help rebalance our economic system.
Our goal is to contribute to the public debate on taxes and support President Obama and Congress in creating a more progressive tax code.
- Their web site is: http://wealthforcommongood.org/
They have positive proposals, I hope you read them.
WE AREN’T BROKE!!!
THE REPUBLICAN SOLUTION IS NOT THE ONLY SOLUTION!!!

Let everyone know that even some very wealthy Americans recognize that serious tax policy changes are needed.

Reply

Diane

5:14 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Eugene. You make some really good points with North Carolina comparison.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eugene Barufkin

1:59 am on Friday, March 25, 2011

Thanks.
Your not the first person I shared this with.
What we need is legislators with spine to make a hard proposal.
The one I've spoken to run.
Why???
They may loose a few votes.
Never believe legislators work for the greater good for us or Wisconsin or the USA.
Money comes first, especially if it funds their campaigns.
Public campaign funding is the only answer.
TAKE THE MONEY OUT OF POLITICS.
more this subject here - http://MoneyedPoliticians.net by a Dedicated Republican

Bob Snyder

5:23 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Diane: What you and many more don't understand is that Public Worker compensation includes wages and benefits. They are already paying 100% of their Health Care and Pension. This is exactly the same with private employees. Total compensation includes wages and benefits. These benefits are part of what they are paid for their labor. If you would like to know how this has been misconstrued read David Kay Johnson.
What is happening in Wisconsin by Walker is that the certain public workers are getting a substantial reduction is their compensation. If we honestly look at it they are getting a pay cut by a dictatorial administration. And then they are also stripped of their collective bargaining rights which they have worked years to achieve. They will no longer be able to negotiate for better working conditions and safety rules. This will result in result in harm to our public services. Larger class sizes for teachers for example. Those that support these unnecessary cut backs are cutting off their noses to spit their faces. You don't recognize that these actions will harm YOU.
The truth is that our State is NOT broke and there are plenty of other measures that could be taken to correct a deficit. You are blinded by Republican rhetoric. When is a unfunded tax break to business NOT a deficit increase?
And Eugene, you are absolutely right. These pay cuts for public workers WILL further erode the Wisconsin economy.

Reply

Bob Snyder

5:24 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

One last thing, everyone need to know that the Walker strategy is part of a greater plan. It includes deliberately pitting one group in society against another; divide and conquer. It includes segregating out a particular sub-group and vilifying them. Making the larger population believe that that group is unfairly privileged and deserves to be cut down. This then makes the larger group feel justified in punishing the villains. That is why many private workers in Wisconsin feel good if their public servants are whipped a little. History shows that this strategy was used with devastating efficiency before.
To counter this evil plan we need to recognize that we are all in this together and look for solutions that are fair and equitable.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine Blonigen

6:33 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Sounds like the rules of "Saul Alinsky" for radicals that was effectively used by OBama. Fight fire with fire, I say. It worked for him.

Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

10:04 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Do you really understand what you just said?

That is exactly the same strategy used by the democrats when talking about the rich.

"Making the larger population believe that that group is unfairly privileged and deserves to be cut down. This then makes the larger group feel justified in punishing the villains. That is why many private (sub public) workers in Wisconsin feel good if their public servants (sub the rich) are whipped a little.

Remember, we need to recognize that we are all in this together, right? Your words, not mine!

Karen Pierce

5:52 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

I've been with my company for 38 years...without collective bargaining. See no need for it. The rest of us have made sacrifices for the last few years...it's about time that the state employees do the same.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Snyder

8:42 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Are you saying that by working in the private sector you have enjoyed a relationship with your employer that excels union workers? Do you have a defined benefit plan? Has your employer increased your compensation as your companies profits have increased and/or management compensation grew? Are you treated with respect and given pay raises as your experience level increased? Are you getting profit sharing or other extraordinary benefits that honor your contributions to the company?
If you have, then you are working for an exceptional company; this is not the normal state of affairs with most private companies.
Maybe not, because you refer to sacrifices that the rest have made!
Then maybe you are just envious and angry. You should be pointing your anger at the source of your bitterness. You have been mistreated by private business and convinced by them that they HAD to do it to you.
Let's recognize that the goals of government and business are drastically different. Gov't exists to serve the public and can tax in order to meet its financial needs.

Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

8:54 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

I have enjoyed a relationship with my employer that excels that of union workers, yes. I have a defined benefit plan. My compensation has increased according to the company's growth. I am treated with respect and am given raises and I am getting profit sharing. ALL DONE WITHOUT A UNION.

Angry? Me? The only thing I'm angry at is having to pay for other peoples' benefits as well as contributing to my own, while union workers enjoy these same benefits at NO cost to them!

Envious? About unions? DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH!! I wouldn't work for ANY employer if I had to join a union to do it. Unions have been bleeding employers dry for decades. They had a time and a place in this country, but that time and place has been gone for a LONG time.

One does not need a union to get fair wages and decent working conditions anymore. More people should try standing up for themselves and not using unions as crutches to get what they want.

JRod

7:33 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Reagan, so you assumed that you schooled me on Reagan's quote. Cute and "ludicrous". Also, I don't and have never received a union newsletter. I noticed that in this blog you have spent most of your time "challenging" other people’s facts and opinions while you have only provided very little facts and lots of personal opinion. This can make the reader think that you have a good argument when in fact you do not provide sufficient data to consider your point worthy of consideration.

For Walker to be able to call the 6% and the 12% a "fair share", he also need raise taxes on the rich and on corporations. Instead he decided to lower taxes on some corporations. To raise one and lower or keep the other the same, make these percentages an “unfair share". Things HAVE in fact changed which mean public employees DO need to pay more (and they have), but the rich and the corporations DO need to also pay more. This idea of “a new normal, let’s make individuals pay more, but oh wait, can't raise taxes on the rich and on corporations" is from someone with a “modicum of common sense and/or knowledge".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark S

7:54 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Ask IL how that whole raising taxes on corporations is working out for them. The corporations have and will continue to leave and the employee's are the ones screwed over.

Ask Jimmy Doyle how raising taxes on cigarettes worked out for him. People bought out of state and on-line reducing (obviously) projected State income from those taxes.

Ask the residents of Milwaukee County how they would respond to taxes continually going up year after year while services go down as do the values of their properties. They will move to surrounding areas and receive the same or better quality of living.

Comment_arrow

Mark S

7:57 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Raising taxes on anyone should be a last resort. If the government has proven that the taxpayer money is being put to good use, then and only then should there ever be an increase in taxes.

Comment_arrow

Bob Snyder

8:44 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Continued response to Karen:

Business exists for only one purpose, to make a profit. In difficult times business must adjust its costs and resources accordingly. That means that you, as a human resource, might be asked to put in more hours, take unpaid time off or take a pay cut, etc. Usually business doesn't ask, it tells.
That is because as individual employees, we have no power. If you don't accept what you are given, business will show you the door. Don't you just love that job security?
I have never belonged to a union and I know that as you get older, your experience means little. If the company can get a younger worker for less, then Good Bye! Remember, nothing matters except the bottom line!
Wake up Karen and see the world as it really is.

JRod

7:34 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Corporations are in fact enjoying billions of record cash balances. Corporations are also benefiting from the highest profit margin levels of the last 17 years. If anyone believes that keeping corporate taxes the SAME under this "NEW NORMAL” will create jobs, you have another think coming. You must also stop reading the corporate newsletter.
@ Reagan, to bring up the “New Civility” call that Obama made days after the murder of a 9 year old girl in Arizona as rebuttal to Eugene’s comment of S Walker might put into question your ability to reason and apply logic. Please consider the possibility that your arguments can be equally flawed.

One more thing, your idea that the 1billion is “just coming from a different source” makes the assumptions that all the corporations that pay corporate taxes are Wisconsin based, that none are foreign, that all the shareholders of all those corporations reside within the state of Wisconsin and that all the moneys not paid in higher taxes stay in the Wisconsin economy. You also assume that taking a few cents from the masses (corporations, the RICH as well as all the other Wisconsin tax payers) has the same economic impact than taking a few dollars from the hands of a few in the middle class.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

9:51 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Corporations really have little to do with this debate. This is about public employee benefits and their cost vs. what all taxpayers can afford and whether they should continue to fund the lavish retirement plans of these public workers.

Also, please at least try to get your numbers aligned.... Jack P says it is trillions and now you say it only billions. Did corporations lose 100's of billions of dollars in the span of 10-15 posts?

Here is an idea for you guys. If corporations are so profit driven and holding so much money, how about going to this little thing called the NYSE to invest in some of these companies so you to can share their trillions (or is it billions?) of dollars in profits.

Mark S

7:39 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Bob, this is the joke that people use to defend collective bargaining.

'They will no longer be able to negotiate for better working conditions and safety rules.'

They are already protected under state and federal laws for safety and working conditions.
It actually has more to do with them protecting rules that provide them ungodly overtime, extra days off , seniority privileges, paid time for union duties and other compensations no other employees would even think of asking for.

Reply

Bob Snyder

9:00 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Mark S:
Show me the regulations that prevent a school district from demanding unworkable class sizes.
How about the regulations that prevented the recent situation with only ONE air traffic controller on duty.
I'll bet I know which propaganda you have been listening to and accepting without question.
No joke!

Reply

Diane

9:21 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@ Bob I am afraid that you have some facts that are not right. The state has been paying the employer portion AS WELL as the EMPLOYEE portion of the pension plan. So the state has been paying 100% of the pension contributions. Now Gov. Walker proposed in the budget repair bill that the legislature passed that state worker contribute to the EMPLOYEE portion to the pension plan. That is still a lot better than a 10% - 58% 410K match with a cap in the range of 6% to 10% of base pay. This is what the better employers in the private sector contribute to their employee retirements. Not only is the contribution being asked of state employees still pretty small, they get a real pension. The kind where there is a guaranteed benefit when they retire unlike a 401K which could be worth LESS than what was paid into.

Lets take the "substantial reduction" argument in a hypothetical case. Lets say Sally Sluffoff is a state employee making a meager salary of 50K per year. The 5.6 contribution would amount 2,800.00 per year that she would now need to contribute. Lets also add in the 12.8% contribution to her medical costs (keep in mind this is not 12.8% of her salary but is 12.8% of the insurance cost). If you do a web search you will find numbers ranging from 10K to 15K per year. So 12.8% of 15K is only $1920.00. So our poor Sally now has to come up with $4700.00.

to be continued...

Reply

Diane

9:21 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

the rest of the story...

Lets compare that to Willy DeWorker who too makes 50K in salary working for Widgets of America, Inc. He gets a very nice 401K match of 10% up to 6% of his salary (which is pretty typical). In order for Willy to maximize the companies match he would contribute 6% of his salary to his 401K. That is $3,000 per year for retirement (remember his retirement benefit is NOT guaranteed). In addition he has the typical health care plan, not a cadillac plan but not a bad one either. Lets just say for sake of argument that it is about the same as Sally's, so about another $1920.00. So his costs are about 1,000 higher.

Oh yeah, one more little detail... Sally has a family deductible of... believe it or not the WEA plan is $300.... This is according to their web-site

https://www.instantbenefits.com/control-panel/cgi-bin/files/temp/6124815.pdf

Willie has to pay his deductible of 600... per person up to 1,800 per family... I guess that makes the total cost of the benefits for Sally around 5,000 compared to Willie paltry 6,100 - 6,700. I don't know about you but I would love to have Sally's job!

Reply

Mark S

9:39 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Lol
First, we have school boards (you know the ones that have been bowing to the unions for years ) and parents that would not allow that and you know it.
Second, no excuse for a sleeping controller, it's called incompetence. There were two pilots that slept right past MN a year or two ago, does that mean we need three or four pilots? I'm sure we'll find some interesting facts come out, like there was another one that was getting coffee.
Third, learning what collective bargaining is actually about is not 'propaganda' it's called knowledge. Using leverage to get more and more from taxpayers without an ability for them to say enough is called abuse.

Reply

Diane

9:43 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@ Bob re: Gov't exists to serve the public and can tax in order to meet its financial needs." that statement says it all and it is why collective bargaining needs to go away................... we all are tired of the increased taxes - for additional services like more inspectors to make you move your pool or wood pile or telling you that your fence is too short or too tall or the 9 difference food agencies for food inspections. and the cheery attitude you get from the IRS or Post Office and lets not forget the DMV. Dont get me started on the poor service from the Post Office and how many weeks it takes to have undeliverable mail returned with additional postage due. I will stop now.

Reply

Diane

9:45 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@ Mark. Yeah! Right on! : )

Reply

Andy Smith

9:45 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

We must remember the important lessons we have been taught for decades upon decades by our largely Republican and conservative teachers and college instructors:

- Business is bad, even evil, and cannot be presumed trustworthy;
- Government is good, even benevolent, and must be presumed trustworthy.

Therefore:

- Any thing that limits, reduces or penalizes government is a bad thing.
- Any thing that limits, reduces or penalizes business is a good thing.

We can then understand the rigid ideological stance taken by Republicans and conservatives that government rules, regulations and taxes are presumed good ... and that union membership against management is presumed good, whether in the public or the private sector, including organizing against and weakening management or ownership power over the powerless worker -- salary levels, benefit levels, staffing levels, production expectations, classroom sizes, work conditions, work rules, work calendars, etc.

If you believe everything above EXCEPT that the words Republican and conservative must -- for the statements to be true -- be replaced with the words Democrat and liberal, then you understand that these ideological positions are largely cast in stone and that only individuals on the edges of either side might be convinced to swing their point-of-view to the opposite side by rhetoric or logic.

Re-read the first words: "We must remember the important lessons we have been taught for decades upon decades by (whom)" Aha!

Reply

Mark S

10:04 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

@Diane and Andy, let's make sure people that are reasonable and will look out for all taxpayers will be representing us for years to come!

Reply

JRod

1:42 am on Friday, March 25, 2011

Reagan, here you go again. Corporations have everything to do with this debate. This debate is about S Walker's attempt to break unions for the benefit of his corporate friends. In the process he is muddying the waters to try to convince vulnerable people such as you that this is the right and only thing to do.

Since you know about that little thing called NYSE, you ought to know if it is billions or trillions. But while we are at it, this debate has nothing to do with the NYSE.

Incidentally, I do trade in the markets and that is why I am able to supply you with facts not just opinions. I am a capitalist and pro business, but this does not mean that I have to take an abusive position against the individual worker.

I think that many individuals in the middle class side with Republicans because they want to pretend that they belong to the same Country Club rich people and corporations belong to. How else can someone justify voting for the party that clearly does not look after their interests but that of corporations.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

1:12 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

You are so disconnected. Do middle class democrats long to be poor like the bottom 5% in their party. I also love the continued hate for corporations. Someone who is a capitalist and pro-business does not need to state that to make a point. Rather that is a common tactic of the left to try and make others believe you are more reasonable and can see both sides of an issue. However, your statement about country clubs proves anything but reason. You sound like a typical lefty with disdain for corporations and dislike anyone who has become successful because they must have taken advantage of someone or something.

The middle class republicans just aren't smart enough right? They just don't know better right? They are all pretenders and couldn't possibly believe all that stuff right? They couldn't possibly share the same values of family, right to life or God, right? They just don't understand the plight of the common man right? If only I could enlighten them right?

Quite honestly I have better things to do than listen to the lefty diatribe and constant whining by the left on this site. But... then again that is what democrats do better than anyone else....

Vote Prosser on April 5th!

JRod

1:56 am on Friday, March 25, 2011

One more thing, trickle down economics is not working, AGAIN. If it would be working corporations would be taking this excess cash to create jobs, expand, invest in new plant and equipment, etc but they are NOT. Instead they are sitting on the cash and/or increasing divident payouts. But no new jobs. What corporations are saying is that there is no demand for products and services hence no need to create jobs. CONCLUSION: if you give more money to individuals this money will trickle up to the economy. That is if you give the money to the people that will spend it (not the rich) and this in turn creates the demand for products and services. Basic logic.

Reply

Eugene Barufkin

2:14 am on Friday, March 25, 2011

Hay all - take a deep breath -
Has anyone stopped to read this? -
There exists a group of wealthy individuals that are putting Public Good over Individual Greed.
- They state:
Over the last 30 years, economic policies in America have slowly but surely shifted to disproportionately benefit the nation’s top earners.
Wealth for the Common Good, which represents many of these individuals, was organized to help rebalance our economic system.
Our goal is to contribute to the public debate on taxes and support President Obama and Congress in creating a more progressive tax code.
- Their web site is: http://wealthforcommongood.org/
They have positive proposals, I hope you read them.
WE AREN’T BROKE!!!
THE REPUBLICAN SOLUTION IS NOT THE ONLY SOLUTION!!!

Let everyone know that even some very wealthy Americans recognize that serious tax policy changes are needed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark S

7:07 am on Friday, March 25, 2011

Eugene, I read the site. I agree that something needs to be done to fix our tax codes the way they are. I am more in favor of a flat tax and hope someday that will become reality. I am sick of wealthy individuals giving to pet projects that are formed under the guise of 'charity' only to reduce their income and nothing to actually do with charity. I think people should not be giving to a charity because their lawyer and accountant tell them so. What started out to help the poor and needy has turned into a way to skirt the rules and funnel money to save the Walking Stick in Peru Project that someones kid is on the board of. If you feel the need to give to WSPP go ahead, but it wouldn't be a deduction on your taxes.
My worry with what your site is it's just another way for the government to hold our money and do with it what they want, which usually means more waste and corruption. I would rather see it go directly to the food banks and homeless shelters exclusively with the hope it would go directly to the needs of the poor and needy.

Eugene Barufkin

2:15 am on Friday, March 25, 2011

I bet Bob read this from the jest of his comments.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

6:01 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Right there with you, Elaine!

Comment_arrow

Tiffany

12:15 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

Yes, Prosser April 5th.
Get out and VOTE !!!

Eugene Barufkin

3:22 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Mt Reagan's Disciple who ever you are,
Do have at least one "NEW" positive suggestion to make to solve our economic problems?
If you Google my name you will find many I make, publicly, using my real name.
I've suggested we all get together and solve the WI property tax problem.
Have you read my suggestion?
Will you come out of hiding and help?
Are you capable of doing real hard advocacy work or just hide and call people names and label issues you don't agree with, leftest, liberal & the such?
Hay little guy, Stop hiding and be a real man.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

8:53 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Why would I post my real name on a forum like this? We've seen what the left does to people they don't agree with. No thanks, but I don't want my house picketed, my vehicles damaged, my company's doors glued shut, my family's safety threatened or to receive death threats or bomb threats myself. It is much easier to stay anonymous and not have to worry about any of that. You may not be like that yourself, but given that history, why risk it? There is no reason for anyone to know and I'm obviously a real person. Besides, most others on here also go by an unidentifiable alias or nickname so why shouldn't I as well? Quite honestly,I think to use your real name on any type of public forum is a bit risky.

Diane

5:36 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

@ Elaine : we are with you.

Reply

JRod

5:55 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

If you want to go with Elaine back a couple of decades when men thought of women as less than me, you certainly are making the right descision. Good Luck!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

6:01 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Totally uncalled for, JRod. Just because you don't agree with someone's choice doesn't mean you are right or they are wrong, and there's no need for insults.

Mark S

9:55 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

I'm a caveman, but I love strong woman that know how to vote!!

Reply

JRod

9:28 am on Monday, March 28, 2011

Insult??? Personal??? Please....

Reply

Diane

9:29 am on Monday, March 28, 2011

We are with Elaine - vote Prosser April 5

Reply

JRod

9:35 am on Monday, March 28, 2011

Go back three decades with Elaine. Vote Prosser April 5.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

9:41 am on Monday, March 28, 2011

We will, and thank you so much for your permission, not that we needed it.

Elaine Blonigen

9:45 am on Monday, March 28, 2011

Vote Lloyd Carter as Waukesha County Judge......Kathleen Stilling has spent her life protecting sexual predators.
Lloyd Carter and Judge Prosser has our vote.....!!!!
Thanks to everyone for your vote of confidence. I refuse to keep quiet.

Reply

Reagan's Disciple

11:48 am on Monday, March 28, 2011

Three decades back was 1981, Reagan was just starting his presidency and there were many great achievements to be made in the next few years. Winning the Cold War, making Americans proud and on the cusps of one of the greatest economic and market expansions in the history of the US. Similarly, he took over for an individual who failed miserably (Carter) just as Walker is taking over for a miserable and failed predecessor (Doyle).

Vote Prosser April 5th! Keep WI Strong!

Reply

JRod

11:58 am on Monday, March 28, 2011

I wouldn't want it any other way, it is a democracy. I just don't think that an individual that is doesn't choose his reactions but his reactions choose him is a good candidate as Supreme Court Judge.

Reply

JRod

12:10 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

Let's put it this way; I would choose Clinton's presidential terms over Reagan's hands down no questions.

Reply

JRod

12:44 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

Reagan was president for two terms. Taking credit for the nation's accomplishments for the three decades following makes you the best Reagan Disciple but also a bit extreme. You speak about Reagan as if his presidency was a model to our history. Please remember that during his terms we saw the US selling arms to Iran, unemployment was no lower than 5.5% and it was only during the last two years of his presidency, we saw the highest number of bank failures since and including during the Great Depression and growth was easy to achieve with the descision to increase our budget deficits to levels never seen before. Let's remember that the budget deficit was corrected and back into the black with the arrival of Clinton. I am happy however to see you not bring up President Bush or Richard Nixon as evidence of Republican political supremacy. Thank you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

2:23 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

If that were the case I would have chosen the name Bush's Disciple. The greatness of Bush will not be recognized for a few more years, (although Obama may make that sooner) but when it is, and it will be, remember this post as an "I told you so.".

Prosser on April 5th!

JRod

2:55 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

I am glad you did not argue against the reality of Reagan's terms as President. I think the success of Bush's Presidency rests entirely on our ability to forget. 97% of historians Alreadyconsider it a failure.

Reply

JRod

3:04 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

I hope you are not holding your breath my friend. Save the State of Wisconsin don't vote Prosser April 5th.

Reply

Elaine Blonigen

5:36 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

Well, progress is being made. We're considering ourselves friends. Well, as good as that sounds, friends agree to disagree.

Personally, for as rare as it may sound, I'm grateful for "rich" people. They pay more in taxes than I do, they have given my families jobs, they have created wealth for themselves, yes. But after watching my husband run a business for 25 years I believe most "average" taxpayers would never want to pay the personal price to be a success. In fact, your average person just wants to go to work an earn a living, take home a paycheck and doesn't want to make the 70-80 hours a week it takes to be a success. And, guess what, we never got rich. He now works for a "regular" employeer and is happy to add to their wealth so he can just be a "regular" guy.

Most government workers just want to be among the "regular" folks as long as the rest of us pay for their retirement and healthcare for the rest of their lives.

I am making calls promoting Vote for Prosser on April 5th and the response has been very positive. Our energy surpasses the anger of the Unions and we will prevail.

Reply

JRod

6:21 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

Elaine, I can appreciate your position. Please know I don’t find joy in wanting to make the rich pay more in taxes, but this situation that we are going through calls for their taxes to be raised at least temporarily. Perhaps until we as a Nation re-gain footing. The wealth that has been accumulated by the rich is stagnant and out of our economic flow. There are so many goods and services that they possibly consume. So that accumulated wealth is not moving. To make matters worse, the strong and close relationship between our government officials and them make matters worse by phasing out estate taxes, capital gain taxes, etc, etc. At the very least our tax structure should incent them to spend by taxing wealth at a higher rate. Give them an incentive to spend in home improvements or new vehicles, or in bringing jobs back to the US. It is on everyone's best interest, including them, that we make these changes so we can move forward. Remember, it is our purchasing power that helped make them rich. We are the customers and the engine of the corporations and the rich. If we increase taxes on the masses (non rich/non corporations) we will put us our economy further into the recession whole. Right now corporations are enjoying record cash balances and profit margins. What does that mean? They are doing well but the rest of the Nation as a whole is not.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elaine Blonigen

8:15 am on Tuesday, March 29, 2011

I do like the idea of a flat tax. At least it would make the "moochers" pay their fair share. There are so many people working the system including single mothers and the unemployed. This includes some of my own close & extended family. I've listened to how they think and quite frankly their attitude stinks & I'm tired of supporting them when we've worked so hard all of our lives. But if we want "true" equity there wouldn't be these luxurious benefits that come from collective bargaining and we pay for those too. And, I'm not just talking about teachers. The only people who "deserve" the best in benefits are those who serve our country & they don't have the healthcare they deserve.

Most Public Union workers don't risk their lives. They make choices and they have a choice to join the private sector. Our country would change dramatically if we got rid of unions, lobbyists/activists. Picture a world without them & with politicians and a media that told the truth. That would only happen if all elected positions were "one" term offices & didn't concern themselves with protecting their own jobs. Then maybe they would attempt to work together & actually find solutions.

Judge Prosser has served for 12 years & that's the way it works for now. If you look at his voting record he's been very mainstream and not as partisan and most people are led to believe. Kloppenburg has never been a judge and is supported by those who want to continue feeding at the trough.

Karen Pierce

6:24 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

A truly fair income tax law would be the flat tax. No matter what you earn - a set percentage for EVERYONE is taken out of your pay. Damn the tax shelters, the deductions, the loopholes...whatever the percentage is, that is what you pay on your income, whether you earn $10,000 or $ 100,000 or anything in between, above or below. Only then will income taxes be equitable.

Reply

Diane

7:26 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011

@ Elaine - thank you.
@ karen - we agree. But it would mean no jobs for the CPAs who then would be whining.

Reply

JRod

11:58 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I am sorry to say that I struggle with people in the middle class that spend time looking over at what anyone else get. Let me make a suggestion; If you are jealous of people who are unemployed, then do something about it so you become unemployed. If you wish you would be so poor that you would qualify for food stamps, then pray that you loose both your jobs so that you can get them. If you want to be a single parent, you can do that too and that way you might qualify for rent assistance. I really wish everyone would mind their own business and their own lives, and be happy with who they are and with what they have. This thing about looking down the ladder and picking on the needy is a bit sad. When you look at the whole American pie, what they are getting are the crumbs. I think that a lot of the policies of the "right" focus on very sad socio-economic bullying. We are human beings for God's sake not a pack of wolves. To make matters worse, since the top 1 or 2% pay 65% of the taxes in this country, most of the people that join-in the bullying don't even have the right to make any claims about the money they are getting because the middle class is NOT carrying their own weight. We just heard GE is not only paying less taxes than someone that is making $40,000 but they are getting a credit. Corporations create jobs, but this is plain good old lobbying.

Reply

JRod

12:06 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

One more fact for those union worker haters. The Labor Bureau of Statistics show that for the last several decades personal income has gone down at the same rate as the amount of union employees. What that means is that unions help everyone's income stay higher. Yes, that includes the private sector as well. Think about it, when the union worker's income and benefits go down, there is no need for private sector jobs to pay as much or offer as many benefits. So, as you celebrate S Walker's win, be aware that you are shooting your own foot in the process of hatng what they get. Add to that the fact that these people might leave the union, there will be a higher supply of workers and more competition for YOUR job. Keep hating.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

5:19 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Okay, I can honestly tell you that in the 38 years I have been with my employer, no union ever had an effect on my wage, benefits, raises or anything else. So please don't generalize. Also, why would "these people" leave the unions? Just because they're not getting free benefits and collective bargaining? Wakey wakey, they're not going to get free benefits and/or collective bargaining in the real world either!

Finally....from reading your comments over the last couple of weeks, JRod, it's painfully clear that YOU are the one full of hate in this group...YOU are the one spewing venom to everyone who doesn't support your view on unions.

Chill out. You're going to give yourself a heart attack...

Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

12:32 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

What I dislike most about unions, besides having to pay for THEIR benefits, etc., is the "thug mentality" and the way they like to hold the entire community hostage when they don't get their way. There IS no bargaining when it comes to unions - it's their way or the highway. The "I'm gonna take my ball and go home" attitude truly sucks in this day and age.

People are making sacrifices. Unions should give that a shot instead of tossing out threats. Problem is we've been letting them get away with it for too many years.

End of the road. Gravy train has left the station....

Karen Pierce

9:20 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Heh...didn't you know that Unions are above the law - and reproach?

Reply

Alexis

9:32 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Like I said.."keep it up." More votes for Prosser on Tuesday !
No freedom of speech here in Wisconsin, oh unless you are in support of union thugs.
Hats off to all the local networks for covering that story last night !!
Neutral means "no"... "put up these signs or else"?????
Yes, nice job Jimmy P.

GO PROSSER !!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

12:27 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

@Alexis -- AGREE!!! GO PROSSER!!!

Diane

10:44 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

@Alexis. Agree! Vote Prosser! There were 8000 yard signs distributed weeks ago. We printed our own and put them out. Can download a PDF file at Prosser's website. I cant wait to see the union signs in business for me to boycott. PROSSER PROSSER PROSSER PROSSER

Reply

Diane

10:46 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Heard on the news this morning to expect to see people with recall petitions at the polling places on Tuesday.

Reply

Alexis

11:00 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

@Diane & anybody else interested
I received word this morning that new Prosser signs have come in. I know they had been out of them. Contact the Prosser campaign office if you'd like a sign or two or three !! :-) or yes you can make your own as well.

Yes I heard they can do the recall petitions at polling places ...oh joy ! Since they will do anything to stop us...this should be interesting.
GO WALKER - GO PROSSER !!

Reply

Diane

1:03 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

@Alexis
Do you have a phone number for Prosser campaign office? There was a list of phone numbers on his website awhile ago, but not now. Thanks!

Reply

Elaine Blonigen

1:20 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

You Go Girls! I hope you are as vocal with everyone as you are here. I have been. I'm not going to let those protesters drown out my voice. Are we allowed to wear our "Support Prosser" pins into the polling booth? Probably not, but I won't be bullied whether those protesters are standing there or not. I've been going out of my way to support the businesses that are being bullied by these protesters and I always find a manager to let them know that. They need to know there are PLENTY of us out there. We are the majority so let's hope all of us show up to VOTE PROSSER on Tuesday.

Reply

Diane

1:30 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I vote at
Peace Lutheran Church
17651 West Small Road
and if I see requests for recall petitions or a worker "rights" group, I may stand with my Prosser sign.

Reply

Alexis

1:35 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I am even MORE vocal than I am on here !! LOL
I think I just might wear a "Support Prosser" pin.
Why not they can wear/do whatever they want, so can I. I have emailed & told everybody I know how important it is to vote Tuesday, lets hope everyone takes just a little time out of their day to vote. It's so very important !
Diane..the number I have for signs is: 262-522-2889 they are getting signs in today or tomorrow. They also need volunteers to help put signs together..I am hoping to recruit some people & help out over the weekend !

GO PROSSER !!!

Reply

JRod

1:43 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

@ Mark. The article written by a conservative website does state "BORDERS on illegal". What S Walker is doing against the judge orders, IS illegal. And I am supposed to support the judge that supports the guy that sees himself over the law of the state he governs. A guy stealing a candy bar from Walgreens gets arrested before getting a judge to see the case. Here the judge is giving his rulling and S Walker and his government ignore it. I don't care who you support, there are times that in support for our democracy you have to call your politician and tell them to stop breaking the law. Here is a case of if it is our guy its okay. We are going backwards people!, and this has nothing to do with unions.

Reply

Eugene Barufkin

2:05 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

If anyone thinks Walker cares how many people are living on the streets of Wisconsin and how many more will be added because of his crazy illogical plans, you're as warped as he is.
What happened to the 10 Commends being enacted in Wisconsin??
Did Moses bypass Wisconsin?
It seems to me Walker can not read well.
- It's obvious he can not read the 10 Commandments.
If he thinks about this for a few minutes, he may come up with the weird idea that Wisconsin's education and support for the needy must be improved and NOT GUTTED.
(Whoops, Walker think positively, I made a mistake) (scratch that thought.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

2:40 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Hmmm...ten commandments....thou shalt not steal....
(Do the unions have a clue as to the meaning of that commandment?? I think not...they've been stealing from us for years.)

JRod

2:18 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Karen, please consinder the posibility t,hat the hate you feel might be the one working really hard to find hate in my words. Just a thought. I know, cause I only hate a couple of people in my wife's side of the family and it has nothing to do with politics. So, I love you. There. :)

As far as your comment that the union has not done anything for you, pease know that labor cost is set by the market. So while the union is demanding higher benefits, you are indirectly the benefactor of higher wages in this society. Let's suppose that GE wants to transfer an employee to your community. They will offer a better moving package to the employee and when that person buys the house in your neighborhood it will raise the price of your house. So the union bargaining does help you. The Republican party wants to lower their benefits so they can lower yours in the long run. Statistics show the evidence. Just please plan accondingly. Whatever you do, please don't listen to Rush or Beck. Please!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

2:38 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

As I stated....several times....I am not feeling any hate. It certainly appears that you are, though. I really think you need to calm down...

(and trust me - you know nothing about my employer.)

Alexis

2:35 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Blah Blah Blah...Are you trying to convince us of something?? Not working.....

VOTE FOR PROSSER April 5th !!!

Reply

Diane

2:37 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

@JRod
I dont see that Karen used the word "hate". That is pretty strong - way too strong for this discussion. I was taught that hating someone means you want them dead. I dont think that is what you mean. Prosser still gets my vote. and the sign in my yard. and perhaps me with a sign on Small Road on April 5.

Reply

JRod

2:42 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Since you have shared some of your personal situation, I think it would be important for you to know why I decided to call out the "haters" come from. My kids always went to private schools. I always paid property taxes for which I was not getting any benefit of. I still pay tons of property taxes and my kids are out of school. Not once did I look at how my property taxes were paying for someone else's kids education. That was until I started to hear the oppinion of some of those parents that I was paying for their kids to get an education. My hard earned money. And their kids had better computers, proograms, services, lunches, all that gravy that you talk about. I never cried as you called it. So unless you never had any kids go to public schools, you shouldn't be saying that you are paying those cushi benefits because you and most everyone is not. Do the math. It costs about $10,000 a year per child. Look at your property tax bill. So, for those out there in this position, please stop talking about what someone else gets. You have no right. Just begin to enjoy YOUR free ride.

See how much you pay in property taxes and see how much did that cover the cost of your children going to school every year. only is paying for those union

Reply

JRod

2:44 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Please excuse my bad cut and paste job.

Reply

Alexis

2:46 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Thnx Reagan !
and Amen Karen !!
Enough is enough !!

Reply

Karen Pierce

2:48 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I think JRod needs to settle down before he has a coronary. He's not going to convince any of us to "come over" to his side. I've long said that unions had a time and a place in this country - decades ago. That time has passed. Now, they're nothing more than legalized Mafia. Thugs. Extortionists. Thieves.

I've no hate for them - however, I've no use for them either.

Reply

Alexis

3:00 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Karen is right, we are not going over to that dark side of thugs, extortionists & thieves.
I too believe unions had a place at one time but no more There are many, many laws in place to protect employees actual rights...not privileges...rights !!

Reply

JRod

3:39 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

But can I ask,

1- Since I am the one paying your your kids to go to school, why is it that it is not up to me to decide how the money gets spent.

The average family in Waukesha County has two kids and owns a $250,000 house. They pay $3,500 in property taxes. IF you do the math, you will see that at graduation this family paid $42,000 for their children to go to school but a neighbor (such as me) paid the rest or $246,000.

You might want to consider how the taxpayer is supporting your family before you talk about how someone else is supporting that of others. We have to behave like adults, not children.

I am not writing to convince anyone. I am intelligent enough to know that will never happen. I do think that people need to pay their OWN WAY before they have the RIGHT to DEMAND that others pay theirs. That is all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

3:57 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

You can indeed ask....and I can tell you that YOU, JRod, are not paying for my kids to go to school, as I have no children. I HAVE, however, been paying for everyone else's children's education, just as you are.

I pay for my benefits. Why do I need to pay for someone else's benefits?

I have made sacrifices. I'm asking that others do the same, rather than expect ME to make MORE sacrifices, when they make none!

I HAVE paid my fair share. And I am asking hat everyone else do the same. That's all.

That's fair.

Alexis

3:54 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

JRod what about those of us who have no children at all.
I pay thru the nose in taxes. I think the least our district can do is look for ways to cut costs..ie contributing just a bit more to their OWN health ins & pensions. The peace of mind alone, of not having to worry about money for retirement, should be enough to get people to pay just a little more. A huge portion of my property taxes paid for FLAT screen tv's...really?? I didn't need those when I was in school.
I know for a fact that there are MANY other ways to save money in my district & yes that does include kicking in for their own pensions & finding less expensive insurance, which a friend on the board told me would be a huge savings.
So I have been paying my way for a long time...time for just a small concession from others.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

4:00 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

@Alexis - HEAR HEAR!!!!! And amen!!!

Alexis

4:08 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Karen, I can relate.
I have been paying taxes for 15 years now.
Every time I look at that "pie chart" with the portion of my taxes that goes to schools...I shudder. On the other hand, I do want good schools for my friends & neighbors children, but I think there is just TO MUCH WASTE and now with everything coming to light, I REALLY think there is to much waste. I appreciate teachers, city snow plowers and others who do a service but SO DO I.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

4:18 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Exactly, Alexis. I've been paying taxes for 41 years. No kids in school. And you're right, there IS a lot of waste in schools this year. What really frightens me is that with all the computers, all the high tech equipment these schools now have, I find it increasingly difficult to find a young person who can either spell or construct a decent sentence, or even have a decent understanding of basic math to be able to make change!! Schools are costing us more and more, for more and more advanced equipment, and we're turning out kids that don't have the BASICS that we learned in grade school! What good is all that equipment doing? What we NEED is to go BACK to basics. Teachers, text books, chalk boards and homework. Period. Cheaper, and I'd bet you a dollar to donuts, MORE EFFECTIVE.

Eugene Barufkin

4:21 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Alexis - Your question is an easy one to answer.
Who paid for your education?
Now it's your turn to pay for the current generation.

& Karen - Can you describe some of the waste you are aware of?????
I bet the School Boards, Town and County Fathers would like to hear from you.
They struggle everyday with limited budgets and requests for improving the schools and patching potholes and sheltering & feeding the less fortunate and calls for more police protection.

Do you do any volunteer work to help out in these very dire times?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

4:35 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Eugene, I personally know several employees of the Elmbrook School District who have told me that, first of all, their salaries, for what they do, are obscenely high. Could we also talk about the Cadillac health care the employees enjoy? Let's go on to the high tech equipment for students - high tech equipment that apparently doesn't TEACH them anything. Limited budgets, my butt!! Cut down some of the expenses before whining about budgets. Turn out kids with EDUCATIONS who can speak intelligently enough to sound like they've at least gotten through grade school! If that means taking away the high tech equipment and going back to TEACHING, so be it! Saving money to boot! Who paid for MY education? My parents did. ALL of it. I grew up in a time when people paid for their own children.
No, I do not do volunteer work. I work full time, and I have an elderly mother to take care of.

Comment_arrow

Mark S

6:02 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

We (my family) volunteer, and we don't call volunteering by standing on the street corner with a picket sign, recall petition, or some liberal cause. We try to make sure we give to the people that need it!!

Alexis

4:23 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Karen....LOVE IT

Eug I went to catholic school !!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

6:07 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

@Mark S - Wasn't sure if anyone would consider charity as volunteering, so didn't mention it, but since you have...heh....Yes...in addition to working a full time job and taking care of my elderly mother, I also contribute to several charities. I guess I'm volunteering my money! Good point!

Comment_arrow

Mark S

7:31 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Unfortuantely the Left writes the rules on charity and volunteering when it comes to public perception. Good thing we know there are no rules and true giving is not measured.

Alexis

4:25 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Eug...stop it !!
Back off of the Caffeine !!

Reply

Karen Pierce

4:41 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I have heard - and have not verified this for myself yet, but plan on researching it - that the Elmbrook School District has, in addition to the School Administrator, THREE assistant administrators. If that is the case - and I am saying IF that is the case - there's some waste for you. A school district this size does not need a total of 4 administrators.
The best way to cut costs in school is to cut down on the number of board members, cut down on the high tech equipment, get more reasonably priced health insurance, have employees help PAY for that health insurance, have employees help PAY for their retirement benefits, and get back to basics so that they can turn out EDUCATED young men and women.

Reply

JRod

4:56 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Karen, did you do your own math? You have been paying taxes for 41 years. That is not the only number that goes in the equation. How many of your kids did go to public school. Did your parents send you to private school?

Diane and Reagan, where are you?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

5:02 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

JRod - if you would read my statements in their entirety, you would have seen my answer to your question....NONE of my kids went to public schools. I HAVE no children. And yes, I went to a parochial school, where my PARENTS paid for my education. No tax dollars went into my education.

Mark S

5:16 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Eug I went to Catholic School too! Half the money I made since I was 12 went to help out because it was a family decision as it was so eloquently put. Same with my brother, sisters had to work too (they started working later). What happened to my folks and Alexis' folks money since people like my family and Alexis' went to a Catholic School? What happens to my money now that our family will choose to go private? My folks are 70 and every dime from the public school fund went to people that we never even met. Sound fair? NOT. Kinda funny how the Catholic School teachers make about half of what the public school teachers get yet love their jobs. SOUND LIKE THEY MIGHT DO IT FOR THE KIDS?!

Your argument is old and soft. Kneeling on some dried peas for a while might toughen you up....

Reply

Diane

5:49 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I am Diane's husband and I read a lot of the comments, skimmed others and I really have to express some of my own views...

1. The State Supreme Court race between Prosser and Kloppenburg is much larger than this single issue. Prosser believes in judicial constraint, in other words do not make laws from the bench. Kloppenburg has said in the past that she would vote her conscious, NOT what the laws of Wisconsin govern her to do . So even if you disagree with the Budget Repair Bill, feel Walker is attacking unions or any other of the rhetoric, DO NOT make the mistake of electing someone who believes her opinion carries more weight than the law!!

2. The concept of Flat taxes vs. Graduated taxes has been around a long time. I have debated with my family, especially my brother on this many times. What most people understand when talking about flat taxes is the tax code is way to complex and favors one group over another with the various deductions/credits. They think in terms of a flat tax as the elimination of the deductions/credits, which it is not. To paraphrase Warren Buffet "I only paid 16K in taxes on my income... which is way to low". There are two points in that statement that should be understood. Flat taxes would not change that and Warren, like the rest of us pay as little as possible. What needs fixing is elimination of deductions/credits. Not Flat vs. Graduated.

Diane's Other half :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

6:05 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Good points, Diane's Other Half!

Comment_arrow

Mark S

7:02 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I thought that was the idea of the flat tax? Wouldn't the deductions/credits for the most part be eliminated? To get rid of funny accounting to skirt the law.
I'm not be a smart ass, just asking.

Mark S

5:58 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Diane's almost better half is smart!!

Reply

Diane

6:26 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

@JRod
Why do you want to know where we are?

Reply

Diane

6:31 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

all:
my better half is VERY VERY smart!

re: volunteering
is working at the Homeless Shelter or meal sites feeding the hungry or packing food to send to Haiti, helping to build Habitat houses, cleaning the litter from highways.

Picketing and getting signatures is being politically active, not volunteering.

Reply

Diane

6:54 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Did you see what passed in Ohio - limits on collective bargaining! YEAH OHIO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark S

6:56 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Yeh and bad umpiring in the Brewers game :(

Comment_arrow

Elaine Blonigen

1:43 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Yippee for Ohio!

And just so everyone knows, I volunteer too. I teach a brain fitness class and a current events class at Oakhill Retirement home. Gotta make sure those folks know what's going on out here too. If they need rides to the polling stations guess who will be there. You guess it....me!

Diane

7:45 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

The idea that is often linked with flat taxes is elimination of the deductions. But they are two totally different things. Changing from a graduated tax to a flat tax without the other tax reforms is pointless, in fact would favor the rich even more. What the debate should be about isn't flat tax vs graduated taxes but the need to promote social policy through tax laws. Why do we get a credit for mortgage interest? To encourage home ownership... but why? Why do we get a deduction for our dependents? For reimbursed employee expenses? For Capitol losses? For wildlife funds? Get ride of ALL the deductions / credits and define income as any source of money earned. Then a graduated tax structure would allow the most needy in society to pay a little while the most affluent would pay a higher percentage.

I believe that we all would see significant reductions in taxes... and the cost to prepare them. That is another racket...

Diane's other half :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark S

7:57 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Thanks for explaining, I was way off on the deduction part for sure. That is my main issue, I am sick of BS charities and goofy loopholes that allow money to be given to people and groups that don't need it just to lower income for the wealthy. I will be doing my research, and continue to overpay my mutant...... (that's accountant).

Know wonder why I like you Diane, your smart and you have good taste.

JRod

9:23 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Diane, I was just accused of not reading someones post in its entirety. My post is clear. Were you the bneficiary of public education and or are your personal property tax payments enough as to cover the cost of your chbildren education? If the answer is no, you are in a very weak or in no position to tell someone else what they are entitled to.

Does Mark have or will he have kids in the public school system? Is Reagan hidding?

So far I have found an unusual amount of people in a conversation that are in fact carrying their own weight as far as education is concerned and haveevery right to be upset about waist.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

10:07 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

As a Conservative I must chant "WHINE, WHINE, WHINE". Get over it you coddled crybabies. Thank you Governor Walker for standing up for the real working families and not the entitled, trough feeding moochers.

Reply

Alexis

9:41 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

As far as education is concerned. My siblings & I all went to private school. I have lived in the same community all my life, my father still lives here (& pays taxes) my grandmother lived here years ago and she paid taxes as well.
You may be surprised to know, as I was, just how many people we have met with no children. They also pay taxes and at least one couple we know, both attended private school. I do not know about the rest, but there are allot of us out here who do NOT have children & are still required to pay the same amount for property taxes as those who do have children. We have all paid & are still paying our share. My brother lives in East Troy & his girls attend private school as well. Again, I am not opposed to a good education, but think these small concessions need to be made. This is not just about the schools but all unions. I don't think it's right/fair for those folks to have all those "entitlements" when I work just as hard(maybe harder in some cases).
I know quite a few teachers & one lawyer friend who works for the state, they have all said on numerous occasions, how good they have it...until now. Now I am hearing as John G said.."whine, whine, whine"...I have to laugh. They seem to think they are taking a pay cut because they have to contribute to their OWN health & pension...LOL Are you kidding??

Reply

JRod

10:56 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Well ladies and gentlemen, I stand humbled before your opininon and your position. I can't argue with most of you people that have blogged during the last two days. I am in the same position as you, so I understand what is it to pay for private school and still, when my kids have been out of school for seven years, be paying property taxes to educate someone else's children. I concede that you guys DO have full right to be upset with the current education funding system and demand change. What I don't like is the rest of the people out there who apparently don't read or write in this blog, that ARE getting an even cushier deal than the teachers themselves and are raising picketing signs demanding that the government take something away from someone else as if it was their hard earned money.

So the "freeloaders" are calling the "freeloaders", "freeloaders".

I am still waiting for Reagan to tell me if he is in the position to call people "free loaders" or if he put his "freeloader" sign away.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

12:41 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

thank you for finally understanding my position, JRod.

Elaine Blonigen

12:48 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

I just left the "Relect Prosser" offices in Waukesha and the phone calls are buzzing away. I plan to go back later and again tomorrow to be sure I don't wake up Wednesday morning and feel like I didn't do everything I can to be sure we have a judge who makes decisions based on the "letter of the law" and not his personal "feelings". Feelings have no place in our court system.
I just picked up a sign and put in Hwy 164 where there's a lot of traffic. I'm talking to my neighbors and sending emails too. VOTE PROSSER ON APRIL 5!!!!!
Please talk to everyone....we will not be put down by these Public Union Complainers.
Oh, and I'm praying a lot too.....and then I've apologized to him for asking him to get involved in "our" world. It's our job to fix our world....

Reply

JRod

1:00 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Totally. I hope you finally understand mine.

Reply

Diane

1:07 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

I just called 262-522-2889 and was told there may be more PROSSER yard signs tomorrow. The campaign is out of money because there is a cap. I will call again tomorrow and hopefully be able to put out more signs over the weekend.

Reply

Diane

1:08 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

@JRod again - why do you want to know where we are?

Reply

JRod

1:12 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Diane, You answered my question.

Reply

Alexis

1:30 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Hey JRod...thank you for understanding my position. Hope you have a fantastic weekend ! :-)

Elaine...You are awesome to help out like that.
I am hoping to get out there on Sunday & help as well.
To you, Diane & Karen - Have a GREAT Weekend ! Ok ..everybody else also !! LOL
We are not that way...

GO PROSSER !!! VOTE APRIL 5TH !

Reply

JRod

1:59 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

@ Alexis. You too! I hope we get this government/society back in track someday.

Reply

obtw

3:47 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

More Americans work for the government than work in construction, farming, fishing, forestry, manufacturing, mining and utilities combined.

Interesting article.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704050204576219073867182108.html

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

4:06 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

All the moonbats will be taking their heads out of the trough long enough tonight to try to go make a statement at Country Springs Hotel. To those of you planning on doing so, us level-headed taxpayers will be laughing at you from our nice, warm, cozy homes. The Union goons are getting even more outlandish as we speak. You should know, the party is over, no more confiscatory dues feeding your Big Brother Union mentality. You can still try to strongarm the weak into your "club" but at least people won't be forced anymore. After this all dies down, I think I will try to get my Legislators to start looking into making Wisconsin a right-to-work State. Or, maybe you will start getting more reasonable and stop with your tantrum.....?

Reply

Conservative Cathy

4:11 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Prosser a molester go free and shouldn't be rewarded for that. He also insulted another judge and lacks Kloppenberg's experience. I don't care for Walker's tactics and won't be voting again for anyone Republican anymore after this whole fiasco. I believe in Republicans but not Tea Partiers. Their brew is too nasty for my tastes and they need to have their own party--they have ruined what the Republican Party used to stand for. Once things are balanced again in government and these lawless lawmen are gone, I may go back to voting Republican, but not anytime soon.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

12:33 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Lacks Kloppenbergs's experience????

She has never been a judge at ANY level. If the experience you are referring to is suing 80 yr old farmers for the DNR, sorry, but we don't need that type of experience.

Diane

4:36 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

JRod... to answer your question, I do have a public school eduction. My kids went to Catholic schools. I understand the double dip that people who choose to use parochial schools. However, that is a choice I made and I do not shirk my responsibility to my community by supporting pubic education. Where I have issues are with teachers that feel that they are under paid, under appropriated, etc. AND we have districts like MPS that do not graduate 50% of their students. Where is the education in that? Also schools have become more of an indoctrination center rather than a place of education.

OTBW... While you may be right about your stats, but you forgot (or don't know) that a large number of the public sector works you cite are federal employees. Most of which are banned by federal law from being unionized. So I have to ask... What is your point???

Diane's Other half :)

Reply

Diane

4:43 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Conservative Cathy...
1. Read the case where Prosser let a molester go free... also read the comments the "victim" made upon hearing that this is now a political issue.
2. Prosser did call another jurist the B-word if I have my information correct. However what neither you or I know are the circumstances that evoked that kind of statement. I know I have let loose with words way harsher than intended once or twice, I suspect you have too.
3. Your comments about not supporting Republicans because they are ignoring the law. Pleeeease... The fab 14 that took the road trip to Illinois were only breaking the law too. What I believe you really should be saying is "I will not support a Republican who isn't a RINO but is a conservative." While you may be a social conservative, it is obvious that you are not a fiscal conservative at all. And your assertions that Kloppenberg make me doubt your positions on social issues, like tossing 80 year old farmers in jail so that you can garnish their bank accounts for not planting grass instead of crops.

Diane's Other half :)

Reply

obtw

4:56 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

other half, I think the article speaks for itself. Do you have any specific questions?

Reply

Diane

5:16 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

This whole process is a huge fiasco..... no one wins. A group leaves the state to avoid voting.... laws are challenged in court proceedings that doesnt have jurisdiction. Outrageous. We have become a society of "takers not makers" as the article that obtw sited. What a sad, sad country that outsources jobs while our own people are unemployed.... because of the benefits that employees demand.
I am soooooooooooooooooooooooo sad. Diane

Reply

Conservative Cathy

5:23 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Diane, the 14 Dems did not break the law, contrary to popular belief and are not charged with anything illegal as a result. The farmer had been found guilty already by another judge and still ignored the order to plant grass so that there wouldn't be farm run-off entering a waterway. He had his chances and he chose to ignore them. I can't support a party that tries to turn us against each other while breaking the law and gives welfare to corporations and banks. It's so sad that you would complain about the living wages your neighbor makes rather than demanding that your rates/benefits match that same wage. Aren't workers worth more? Working class Americans are down 23%, the super rich are up over 400%. You are pointing fingers at the wrong party in this case. True republicans need to stand against Tea party ideology because they are destroying the legacy built by people like Tommy Thompson and President Reagan.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diane

10:12 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

CC... read my post below... the Dems DID break the law. The Constitution says "Shall make rules" and the Senate rules clearly state that an leave of absence must be voted on... the Dems didn't follow the Senate rules prescribed by the constitution. What would you call that other than breaking the law?

Also let's be honest about the difference in philosophy between the tea party movement and the establishment Republicans like Thompson. Tommy was much more of a moderate than conservative. Also the status quo of spending more, taxing more is what the tea party is railing against. I do not believe the tea party types are saying "toss the widows and single parents out in the winter to fend off the wolves so I can go to Cancun..." I think the message is more "Don't push me into poverty so you can have better pay, bigger pensions and Cadillac insurance..."

Dianes other half

Conservative Cathy

5:35 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

BTW, Diane: Being "fiscally conservative" usually means that you want the poorest with too many kids to suffer for being lazy. Meanwhile, Grandma gets affected with the same cuts while the rich get to buy another vacation home in the Caribbean on the loophole money they keep getting. Fiscally conservative means "don't raise my taxes" and cover only the things that I value, instead of everyone else. Those deep school cuts will mean less afterschool programs and lead to more violence in your neighborhoods ultimately. You may wind up paying outrageous fees to private companies to pick up your trash, etc.,. I could go on and on....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark S

6:22 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

???? Where the heck did you get your definition of fiscally conservative? Please stop pretending, we all know that liberals are even afraid to call themselves liberals now. If you are liberal you should be proud, it's embarrassing to pretend.

Have a good weekend Liberal Cathy.....

obtw

6:38 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

"conservtive"cathy said: I can't support a party that tries to turn us against each other while breaking the law and gives welfare to corporations and banks.....
-----------------
That , my dear, describes the democrats in charge in DC. Do you want links? Just look up War on Libya, Tarp funds to Libyan banks, GM, GoldmanSuchs, GE, Fannie, Freddie, and JPMorgan for starters. All in the news today.

Reply

Reagan's Disciple

7:44 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

conservative cathy = pretender

She has all the soundings of a unionista trying to make people believe she has changed sides. Those radicals are the only ones who come out and say "I was conservative, but...." and then backs everything that any radical liberal has ever stood for.

Reply

Conservative Cathy

7:49 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

I really take offense to that. I am a Reagan republican and proud of it. I loved Tommy Thompson as our governor. He was fair and effective. I just think that the Tea Party needs its own designation--they are way too extreme for me.

Reply

Reagan's Disciple

8:26 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

If it walks like a duck....

Vote Prosser on Tuesday.

And also to get conservative cathy even angrier than she already is......

Make sure to Vote for Rajnicek on the Waukesha School Board. She is the only 1 of the 4 who is NOT endorsed by the teachers union.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

8:47 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

@Reagan. Don't you see? Cathy has it all figured out. Conservatives are so stupid that she can get online and dupe them into believing she is one of them. So, when she denounces the Tea Party (Tea Party isn't really a Political Party Cathy) then us rubes will be compelled to believe it. And Cathy, the Prosser case from 1977 is the best you libs can do? The victims in that case are LIVID with people like you for trying to speak for them, they are doing their own ads supporting Prosser--let me guess, you're going to vote for the child molester's lawyer Stilling though. I'm going to start calling myself "Liberal John" and preaching about personal accountability, right to life, and lower taxes.

Reply

Conservative Cathy

8:52 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

I'm not angry at all. I have faith in my party to overcome the bad name that the Tea Party is giving it. Radicals from any party are not what makes for good government. Walker had it nailed and then they got sloppy and arrogant. That bill would be in effect had they followed the law. Thompson would have been patient and had some class about the whole thing. As for Rajnicek, she just doesn't impress me as a candidate and hasn't familiarized herself with other education-related issues besides the union stuff. In short, she's taking advantage of a political situation without having any other platform to offer . There are too many other important things to consider when it comes to educating our kids.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

8:54 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Hey Cathy, Chris Christie or John McCain, who represents Conservative values?

Reply

Reagan's Disciple

9:47 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

There is nothing morally acceptable about lying about a sexual assault victim's case from 30 years ago (against the victim's wishes) to try and stick something on her opponent. Let us not forget that the victims even asked her to help stop the ad and she refused to even do that! Disgraceful.

My thought is that if they have to go back 30 years and this is the only case they can come up with, he must be doing a very good job!

Reply

sanchez

10:45 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

the tea party is the only reason the GOP is back in the picture. Without the tea party the GOP is just a bunch of old politicians that are ALMOST as corrupt as the democrats.

Reply

JRod

11:04 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

@Diane 1/2. Never once have I called someone a bad name (ie b...) in any kind of setting much less a professional setting for any reason no matter what. So please do not excuse this man from calling a woman a very distasteful name of an animal in a professional setting. Also, where did you get that the 14 broke the law. They did not break the law. So far Walkers was and Fitz was trying tro break the Constitution by wanting to take the Democrats votes away. If you really consider yourself reasonable, please do not excuse them for behaving in such an erratic way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diane

10:26 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

JRod... Kudos to you for being so controlled in your life that you have never lost your temper and said something unprofessional or obscene to someone. I mean that and wish I could say I have always held myself to that standard.

As far as breaking the law... the state constitution and senate rules spell that out pretty clearly. What the Dems forced by their little pleasure cruse to Rockford was as close to a constitutional crisis in this state that I know of.

For a moment let's all step back from the rancor of the issue and just examine the behaviors of the people we elected to govern us.

1. A man was elected on a plank of bringing fiscal constraints to state government and by extension local governments at the county, municipal and school levels too.
2. A massive shift in the political leanings of the two houses of the legislature occurred too.
3. Legislation was introduced and fast-tracked to close a budget gap that has to be closed by law.
4. ALL members of the legislation have a duty and are legally compelled to participate and vote on bills brought to the floor.

This is where everything went haywire... Rather than fighting the fight though the political process by recalls or the 2012 election cycle, the tact was to prevent the business of the state from moving forward. Think about the implications... minority rule over majority will

Now it is in the courts, stopped by a judge elected by a very small percentage of the electorate. Where does it stop?

JRod

11:10 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

@ Reagan, I assume you don't have any kids in the public school system and/or your property taxes are such that you cover the $12,000/yr it cost to educate each children in the Waukesha public system.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark S

7:43 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Sounds like a system that could learn to utilize their funds a little better! If it is costing 12 G for the product we are getting, I'll take 10 kids by me for 6 G each and throw some textbooks in their laps.....

Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

8:47 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@MarkS - HEAR HEAR!!!! I'll do the same!!

Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

8:56 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Correct, no kids in public schools now, in the past, or plans to send them in the future.

But 12k to educate a child sounds ridiculously expensive. I'll check the costs at our school and let you know how much we can do it for, but our tuition is not even close to that. But of course... we don't have buildings full of administrators, nor do our teachers retire at 55 with full pensions that they did not contribute to, oh, and our teachers also pay a more significant portion of their modest health care costs as well. I honestly feel bad for those teachers who do have their hearts in this for the kids. It is really not fair to them and they are the ones getting the bad rap from all the unionistas who have shown recently and in the past that they care about themselves more than anything.

However, in the end our kids still know their 3 "R's" and they are on an equal footing with the public school kids in our neighborhood in regards to education? Who'd a thunk it?

JRod

11:38 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

@Reagan, In the Prosser case, the victim is now an adult and you have do what is legally necessary to protect future potential victims by making the information available to those that have to make a voting decision. I hope you were as protective of the CIA agent when Lewis "Scooter" Libby leaked her name. Or was that not "Disgraceful". A very very American Conservative.

@Diane 1/2 Come on....who was fiscal conservative? Reagan? Bush? Don't make me get deficit numbers please. You know them.... and fiscal conservative is a title you guys can no longer claim.....

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

7:32 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Of that $12k/yr in Waukesha and $15k/yr to teach a child in Milwaukee, nearly 80% of that cost is salaries and benefits. Please watch the movie "Waiting for Superman" to understand how the Union mentality is destroying our schools. How about this, you let me keep 75% of my current property tax bill and I will promise not to send my kids to your public school and use up "your" precious resources. Sound fair? You still get a little something for nothing and I get to prove that public schools can't hold a candle to the TRULY devoted Teachers and Parents of private schools.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

8:45 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Amen! Private school teachers make SO much less money than the public school teachers. And they're HAPPY and enjoy their work, and they turn out a MUCH better product! How can they do it? By not being greedy, that's how!!

Comment_arrow

Mark S

9:51 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

My buddy is already applying to teach private instead of public. He already owns his own lawn care service/ landscaping for the summer (see Jake you can do both!). He says he would be so much happier even if the pay is less. He's felt the whining has been ridiculous for years, now he is ignored for his pro walker stance. He says most teachers don't even understand their contracts, but are just told they are being ripped off and deserve more.

I couldn't imagine how his days at school must be now with all those misinformed cacklin' hen's complaining.....

Reagan's Disciple

8:59 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Please Vote Rajnicek for Waukesha School Board on Tuesday.

She is the fiscally conservative candidate who is the only 1 of the 4 NOT endorsed by the teachers union.

Reply

JRod

9:47 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@Karen, it is not that simple. Private school teachers start with a better product and most of the parents are already more commited to their kids education. That is why they pay a bunch of xtra money. The private school teacher has an easier job.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diane

10:35 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

JRod... good points on parochial vs. public schools. However there is another distinction that I feel is even more productive for the parochial schools. Unruly students can face the ultimate discipline of being told they can no longer attend school there. Public schools do not have that option.... or at least they don't think they do.

I lived in Detroit area back in the early 80's and the Detroit School district wanted to establish a "boys school" to basically warehouse the kids that didn't want to learn and only caused issues. I don't know, but I believe this would have afforded the serious students the ability to lean in a safer and more conducive environment. Also the teachers could then focus on teaching instead of trying to maintain order.

What stopped this?? The ACLU... That's right. They said that it was discrimination because there wasn't a "bad girls school".

I still think the idea has merit and if implemented in Milwaukee may turn that district around so that more that 50% of the kids graduate with a real education... and likely at a lower cost per student. Who knows, maybe some really good parochial school teachers would welcome the challenge of MPS...

Diane's other half

Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

4:01 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

JRod - Horse hockey! A kid is a kid is a kid. Take two kids from the same family - raised the same way - put one in a public school and one a private school. Same beginning product. I guarantee you the kid coming out of the private school is going to be a better "end product" than the one in a public school. Why? Because private school teachers are better teachers. Private schools are better schools. And they cost the taxpayer zippity-doo-dah.
And if some parents aren't committed to their children's education - even more reason to have them pay for their own kids' education. Why should WE have to pay for it, when their own parents don't give a fig about it?

JRod

9:50 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@Reagan. As far as I am concerned you have very little right to be talking about being fiscally conservative. It looks like you don't pay enough taxes to have an opinion on how the money gets spent. You have to bring something to the pot luck if you want to be able to eat.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark S

9:55 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

He doesn't eat from the pot luck, that's the whole problem....

And who the Hell are you to decide how much taxes anyone should be paying anyways?

Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

12:53 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

You better re-read what you just said because you are sounding pretty foolish in backing your own opinion.

You don't believe individuals should have a voice in how tax dollars are spent if they don't pay taxes?

Before it was I better pay in excess of 12k a year or not have kids in the schools. Now it is I don't pay enough period. What will it be tomorrow? See, the problem with you lefties is that no matter how much a person pays, it is never enough. You always want more. But yet you state that if you don't pay taxes you shouldn't really get a voice.

You insinuate that I need to pay more to have a bigger voice, yet you have no clue what I pay in taxes, but still say I don't pay enough. Generally, the left believes that everyone should have a voice and a vote regardless of whether they pay taxes or not. Please sttop and rethink your own position and repost with some clarity as to what you actually believe, or perhaps you don't even know.

Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

1:21 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

JRod, do you really want to go there?? A huge part of the lefts voting block pays no, almost no taxes and has a whole bunch of kids in public schools. You idea here would mean the leftys would lose a lotof their voices in this debate andmost certainly be in a minority position by a big spread.

sanchez

9:56 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Tea Party extreme? Look at the democrat agenda, thats some extreme leftist crap. Look at what the government has done in the last ten years under Bush and Obama Hussein: EXTREME financial irresponsibility. The combination of the two created the Tea Party and yes the people of the Tea Party are EXTREMELY pissed off that this county is being taken down the tubes and we the taxpayers are paying for it.

Why fight the Tea Party when we have the pretty much the same goals, and morals, as the Republicans? Wouldnt time be better spent fighting the democrats?

Look back a couple weeks ago to Madison, there was the union riots AND a Tea Party rally. The Tea Party people were NOT the ones breaking into buildings, refusing to follow police orders, threatening people, interfering with the ability of the government to legislate, etc. Now you tell me who the extreme ones are.

Reply

Diane

10:01 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Article IV, §7
Organization of legislature; quorum; compulsory attendance. Section 7. Each house shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members; and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business, but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may compel the attendance of absent members in such manner and under such penalties as each house may provide

Out of the State of Wisconsin’s Senate rules regarding quorums and attendance…

Senate Rule 15. Roll call, quorum. Before proceeding to business, the roll of the members shall be called, and the names of those present and those absent shall be entered on the journal. A majority of the membership presently serving must be present to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business; a smaller number, however, can adjourn; and may compel the attendance of absent members. When any roll call discloses the lack of a quorum, no further business may be conducted until a quorum is obtained, but the members present may take measures to procure a quorum or may adjourn.

Senate Rule 16. Leave of absence. Members of the senate shall not absent themselves from the session during the entire day without first having obtained leave of absence. Such leave may be granted by a majority vote of the senate at any time.

Reply

JRod

10:13 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Sanchez, blaming Bush and Obama 50/50 for the creation of the tea party would be very unfair. Bush and everyone that voted for him created ths situation not Obama.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

4:05 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

That's YOUR opinion. Give me a choice of Bush or Obummer, and I'll take Bush any day.

JRod

11:17 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Sanchez, the reason Republicans and Democrats have a tough time buying into the tea party as a viable alternative is because your ideas of fixing the problem doesn't take account the disastreous consequences to our country. We know the car has to be fixed but we know we still need all four wheels. You guys don't.

Reply
Comment_arrow

obtw

11:21 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

And you're still pumping air into all four of those tires expecting the car to run, but the engine has blown.

Diane

11:33 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

All...
Diane and I went to a debate earlier this week and heard all 4 candidates for Waukesha School Board and it was obvious that 3 of the 4 are members and have been for some time. Rajnicek is the only one that is not currently on the board. She was the least articulate with her answers, but also with the most passion about her points. She is basically a mom who is fed up with the status quo of spend more, tax more and threaten the public to cut out programs if they balk at the next referendum. While she isn't totally up to speed on the current educational issues facing Waukesha, she obviously cares and has enough intelligence to formula a reasonable opinion.

Contrast that with the comments of one sitting candidate that "...Waukesha has all the best teachers..." . Along with the presumptuous and arrogant statements about the new grading system being so far superior to the traditional A - F grading system based on "... more that 7 years of study..". I am certain I heard in the next breath that it takes special training by the administrators and teachers to use the system. Where does that leave the parents? Or the students for that matter. It is obvious that this board member has been in the seat way too long to think that complex is better than simple, straightforward measures.

Dianes other half

She is the fiscally conservative candidate who is the only 1 of the 4 NOT endorsed by the teachers union.

Reply

JRod

11:51 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@Diane or 1/2. I hope you realize that the research you provided does say COMPEL. Compel means you can force. But nothing there says that if you are unable to force the Senators to the vote that whatever they are doing to avoid the vote is illegal. Regarding consequences, this doesn't mean you can take away constitutional rights.

In summary, what you provided support my point not yours.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

12:47 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Where in either the stateor US constitution does it spell out collective bargaining as a constitutional right???

I'll help you, IT DOESN'T!

Comment_arrow

Rick

6:38 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@Jrod... I decided to branch out on my own because both my wife Diane and I may want to comment on different things and i dont want to introduce more confusion about who is saying what.

Your post and recommned polifact (by Journal Sentinal, not a very unbiased source btw) speaks about the constitutional crisis and powers of the senate has under those circumstances. I konw that they were in a special session called by the Governor to address the budget issues for the current budget. What I posted are the section 7 from our constitution and the senate rules. These apply to all sessions. As far as the concept that something is illegal but there is no penitaly for breaking the law we don't have to go far... Illegal aliens are here... having broken immigration laws and by enlarge are left alone (I know that is not always the case and that is another very sensitive issue). So is smoking pot an illegal act to which there may be no consequence. I can name others, but my point is that not everything that is illegal has a prescribed consequence in the law.

JRod

12:04 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Well see, what you don't understand is that your plan takes away the engine too. And it akes away the driver, and the steering wheel and the transmission along with the STARTER. We Republicans and Democrats understand that we can take things like the air conditioning and shocks even if the ride might be a little bumpy. But taking everything that you guys want to take away will leave just the seats. And then when unemployment goes to 30%+ you are going to say geez I guess I should have taken out the calculator.

Reply

Diane

12:35 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Senate Rule 16. Leave of absence. Members of the senate shall not absent themselves from the session during the entire day without first having obtained leave of absence. Such leave may be granted by a majority vote of the senate at any time.
- - - - -
Was there a vote before the Democratic senators fled the state? Dont think so. They were elected to do a job. The minority does not get its way when they dont like the outcome. Elections have consequence - Walker was elected because people wanted change.

VOTE PROSSER

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRod

2:45 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Your interpretation of Rule 16 is incorrect. Read the following Politifact analisys of the situation. It really covers the entire situation. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2011/mar/24/scott-fitzgerald/wisconsin-senate-majority-leader-scott-fitzgerald-/

Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

4:06 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

JRod - perhaps it's YOUR interpretation that is incorrect...hmm??

JRod

1:32 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@ Foscal Conservative. I hope I am also allowed to help. Read my post again. It has nothing to do with bargaining rights in any Constitution.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

4:55 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Your post (Like your thinking?) is pretty vague. You mention constitutional rights being taken away by the vote, and this is the argument most leftys are making about CB "Rights". If you're talking about the open meeting issue, until the State Supreme has it's say, you're wrong. Unless of course you don't believe in innocent until proven otherwise.

sanchez

2:11 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Jrod, are you one of the people who think the tea party is all about Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck? Sarah and Glenn have just latched on to the popularity of the tea party. People like Ron Paul and Paul Ryan are who I see as great politicians. Your OPINION that their plans have " disastreous consequences to our country" is only that, an opinion. The GOP and Dems have both had their hands at the wheel in the last decade, maybe its time for some real "change"(fiscal conservatism) not the radical change the liberals are pushing for . Taking a chance on the tea party politics is no more of a gamble than taking a chance on the progressive agenda. The progressive agenda sure sounds expensive and if you are a Christian probably goes against some of your moral beliefs.

Reply

JRod

3:18 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@Reagan, My point is clear. Since it is clear that you have danced around this point for a couple of days, I suspect you might have been backed into a corner.

I will make it clear for the benefit of others that are reading this blog.

I believe that no one has the right to call others "freeloaders" if they are "freeloaders" themselves.

ie. If your property taxes are not sufficient to cover the cost of your kids education then someone else's paycheck is paying for you children to go to school.

I have no problem with the way the system work, but when I see people that are getting a cushi deal turn against others because they are getting a cushi deal, I want to throw up. I find that disgraceful, hipocritical, egotistical and laughable.

You are in no position to cast a stone, like the Bible says.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

5:06 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

You may have missed my post from 8:56 this morning about 30-35 up. I'll repost it for you here.... with an added item or two.

8:56am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Correct, no kids in public schools now, in the past, or plans to send them in the future.

But 12k to educate a child sounds ridiculously expensive. I'll check the costs at our school and let you know how much we can do it for, but our tuition is not even close to that. But of course... we don't have buildings full of administrators, nor do our teachers retire at 55 with full pensions that they did not contribute to, oh, and our teachers also pay a more significant portion of their modest health care costs as well. And guess what, they still love their jobs and have been long time employees! I know there are public school teachers who feel the same way.

However, in the end my kids still know their 3 "R's" and they are on an equal footing with the public school kids in our neighborhood in regards to education? Of course, we are actively involved as parents in assisting the learning of our children as well.

I'm not sure if you still consider me one of your "freeloaders" or not? I also have no problems with my tax dollars being reasonably spent on the education of other kids in the district either. I choose to send mine elsewhere, so that is my decision. In my opinion, age 55 retirement with full pension is not reasonable, nor are the buildings full of 100k+ administrators.

John Galt of Muskego

3:59 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@JRod, isn't Politifact from that bastian of unbiased accurate reporting source known as the Urinal-Sentinel? Regarding property taxes, I should be able to stop paying them now and never have to pay them again in order to educate my children then, right? I've paid tens of thousands in them and never sent my kid to public school for one minute.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRod

4:18 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I am sure you read this particular atricle and considered the sourses and the rationale.

If we call it Urinal-Sentinel, can you imagine what descriptions we could asign Rush, Beck and Fox. I think those words would not be at all appropirate in this blog or in any serious conversation.

Re property taxes: I don't have an opinion on that.

Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

5:03 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

JRod,that's what you Leftys never grasp. Rush, Beck, Hannity are opinion programs, and very up front about that. Journal-Sentinel, and the rest of the MSM pretend to be unbiased, when in reality, they are anything but. FOX News is the most balanced news division out there, but I'm sure you will disagree because they will air stories that aren't always nice to liberals.

John Galt of Muskego

4:24 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Boy that Eugene B guy on here doesn't have any contorversial contacts, organizations or likes on his FB page if you look him up----GEEZ! Michael Moore, Ed Schultz? I will leave out the other "entities" dug up. Let me guess, you're a truther too? No offense Eugene, ahem, never mind, offense intended. You are part of the reason people like me are becoming the not so silent majority. Why don't people like you come right out and say things like. "I'm an unapologetic liberal that wants higher taxes, God out of schools, forced unionization, wealth re-distribution, and late-term abortion."--not to mention whatever Rachel Maddow scowled about that day--can't stand that guy either.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRod

4:50 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I don't want late term abortions, all Gods can be allowed in schools, I want GE to pay their fair share and the Rachel Maddow dude provides copies of documents and video footage to back her stories which is something none of your guys do. By the way Fox has been caught doctoring several videos I don't think that dude has.

JRod

4:41 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@Karen, if my interpretation were wrong and your correct the Dem 14 would have been arrested, fined etc.

Please don't tell me they weren't because the Republicans were just being nice.

The proof is in the puding. They can't do anything legal about it. Please!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

5:43 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

You have your interpretation..I have mine...You have your opinion...I have mine...you say poTAto, I say poTAHto....
And we all have the right to our opinions. Until the Dems are successful in taking that away as well. Til then, I will practice that right.
You're no expert, nor am I. You interpret your way. I will interpret mine. Free country. For now.

JRod

5:02 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Conservative, you are lost.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

5:11 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Nope, I'm right here on the side of the working man/Taxpayer fighting for an end to the rediculous demands of public sector unions and their bullying tactics. In fact, I stopped and filled up my tank at Kwik Trip and stopped in at Sendiks and spent some on my hard earned (In a non-union job) dough and let them know at each place that I was shopping there to support the Governor.

John Galt of Muskego

5:10 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I'm sure we could each start posting plenty of videos of MSNBC and FOX where either the entire video isn't shown or something is being presented out of context. In a recent poll 3 out of 4 MSNBC viewers wonderered where the other one was.

Reply

JRod

5:55 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Not the way Fox does. Anyway you don't watch it so you I don't think can tell. I keep hearing his thing about I am sure we could thing but nothing ever comes of it. Thre have been rpublic etractions done by Fox that I have personally seen but not MSNBC.

Reply

Tiffany

6:07 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Nice to see everybody playing so nicely today !! :-)
Had to help out the Prosser campaign today by putting out signs & literature. Great responses from people !

Attended the Republican party dinner last night at Country Springs. Fabulous event !! It was sold out ! Leftys were out in full lefty force as usual at Country Springs !!
One of the gals at our table said they called her a "billionaire" as she drove in and she drives a Ford Focus ! LOL
You just have to laugh at them. Always a great source of entertainment.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reagan's Disciple

6:28 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Thanks Payton... I was making calls for Prosser myself today at HQ. They had some more signs come in today, but they were already low by the time I left. Pretty positve phone calls for the most part. You always get a few strange ones if you do it long enough, but this was not the base supporters we were calling today.

We still need to get out the vote. I hope everyone goes and calls their friends and relatives to tell them how important their vote on Tuesday is!

Vote Prosser and Carter for judge!

John Galt of Muskego

6:08 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

The left distorts far worse JRod. There was just a video going around FB trying to say--"look at FOX distort this story etc" It was a video from OReilly. The video the left was using from OReilly edited out what he said just before the video and they used it to try to say OReilly distorted the story. It was hilarious. So, unfortunately for you JRod, your side cannot monopolize the message anymore and people have alternatives as to where they get their information. I'd like to keep on typing but I have to get out the worlds smallest violin and get it tuned up.
Also, the Union thugs trying to intimidate people with their mis-spelled letters and threatening tone, so laughable and predictable. They scream, "hey, we're relevant, listen to us!". As I've said before, by the looks of Jimmy the Parrot, he's not intimidating anyone other than the local buffet owner.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

6:21 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

To clarify my above comment, the video the left was using to say FOX distorted the story, was a distortion.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

6:22 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Nice to hear Payton, I commend your bravery on breaking through the petrulli curtain.

Reply

sanchez

7:33 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

where can I get a Prosser sign for my yard and a I stand with Walker? I dont have money to donate though, times are tough.

thanks

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tiffany

9:47 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Sanchez ..check your "personal message board" Ican get you a sign no problem

Good Night everyone...
Just finished putting the last of my Prosser signs out..but I do have one for Sanchez ! :-)

Sweet (conservative) dreams !! hee hee

Oh...John Golt you are hilarous ! Yes, libs vote on Wed !!!

Diane

7:42 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@sanchez. I dont think you You dont have to make a contribution to get a sign. Prosser is out of campaign $ so I am not sure that you can get a sign. You can call 262-646-3073 to check. You can download a sign from the Prosser website and make your own yard sign. That's what we did - I made two. They are small, but very readable.

Reply

Diane

7:46 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@Fiscal Conservative. We have done the same thing and will continue.

Reply

Reagan's Disciple

7:53 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Sanchez,

They were out on Friday night and received some more on Saturday. However, those were almost gone by noon as well. No donation is needed, they are just so popular it is tough to keep them on the shelf. Follow Diane'ss advice and/or you can also call 522-2922 or stop by 1701 Pearl St. in Waukesha. Call 1st to make sure they have some or find out when more will be in.

Make sure to also vote Tuesday and tell all your friends and relatives how important this election is too!

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

8:05 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Remind all your liberal friends that the election is Wednesday.

Reply

Diane

8:09 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

@ So, John Galt
LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
On a more serious note, I read on some blog or on Facebook or ??? that some people think the election is in November and if they knew the election is soon, they did not know which day. ARRRRGGGHHHHH

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

8:21 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

No offense Diane, but I dont care which side of the aisle someone is on, if they are that checked out they are not informed enough to vote--which generally favors our side.

Reply

Diane

9:00 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Just saw a post on Facebook that teachers who protested in Madison boarded school buses (for transportation) - the buses werent needed because schools closed that day. Taxpayer buses, Taxpayer gasoline. How about recalls on school board members and superintendents for losing control of their district teachers?

Reply

the tree

9:10 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Diane, the street around the Capitol is one way. It only goes Left.

There will no repercussions.

Reply

Diane

9:56 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Did anyone see the pictures from the Zombie Walk in Madison today?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRod

10:12 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

No need for name calling.

This actually reminds me of an interview last week where Senator Wilson said that there was no need for name calling. We all know that Senator Wilson was the guilty party that called President Obama liar during the POTUS speech on national TV.

Goodnes.

sanchez

12:04 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

I saw some recall Lazich zombies in front of Piggly Wiggly on Racine on Saturday :)

Thanks to everyone for their info on the Prosser yard signs.

I will not forget to vote on Tues, I will also be voting Lloyd Carter, having a hard time voting for someone named "Carter" though ;) Jimmy Carter, second worst President trailing Obama Hussein.

Reply

Diane

3:48 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

There are Prosser yard signs at 1701 Pearl Street - upstairs. We did some phone calls this afternoon - most of them positive for Prosser!

Reply

Keith Best

4:00 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Governor Walker is doing exactly what he said he would do, fix the fiscal mess this state is in. And it will take many steps to do this. The sad part is teachers have no clue that Walker is saving their jobs for the alternative was massive layoffs.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

5:07 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

lollygagger Definition: a person who dawdles or fools around without achievement.
Thank you Governor Walker for stopping the Lollygarchy in this state.

Reply

Diane

6:37 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

@JROD To whom was your comment "No need for name calling" directed. Me about Zombies?

Reply

JRod

10:45 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

This last weekend provided me with the chance to confirm what I already suspected about us adults. All we are is children in older bodies. The challenges we have come upon during the last three or four years have been a test to our character and I think we all have failed misserably. I have seen a bunch of toddlers behave in a more civilized way at a McDonalds Playland than the most of the adults I have seen the last several months. It is trully pathetic to see All American 60+ year olds moving their respective signs in front of each other's like two year olds. I have seen grown "gentlemen" scream their point of view within inches of an older lady's face while the lady was talking back with a sweet grandma's type voice. Six foot plus men get out of their pickup trucks to YELL at small women for "bullying", to the point where police had to be called.
Do we still think we are the best nation and people in the world? We were. That was until our Chinese line of credit got us into financial trouble and we all became nothng but THUGS. Don't tell me this is what democracy is. Take a minute and think back 10 years ago and look at us now. You will not recognize us. To me it is clear that "the frabric of our nation" was nothing but the paper on which money is printed but underneath there is nothing but thugland.

Reply

Tiffany

11:03 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Well JRod it has certainly opened my eyes & many others.
The union thugs have stooped to a new low in my opinion & all their followers are going right along with them desperately trying to hold on to their lavish entitlements. I think conservatives were really trying to deal with this in a civil manner but many are just plain fed up with all the "crap"(excuse my french) they are seeing & hearing. "Survival instinct" has kicked in with some of us as well & we are fighting back. I know "two wrongs, don't make a right" but I guess this is what it's come to.
I spoke with a ton of people over the weekend & many, many of my customers over the past week. I can tell you people are really fired up & tired of what is going on, tired of being taken advantage of.
This is going to be a very interesting election.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRod

12:54 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

I wish you would have left sentence two and three out of your reply.

I say; it is not okay to persecute Tea Partiers. It is not okay to persecute people that are collecting recall signatures. For doing so, IS to persecute Democracy.

Period.

Kelly

11:16 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

@JRod: Have you seen "The End of America", "Inside Job" or "Race to Nowhere"? I would love to know your thoughts on these movies. My eyes are opening. WHAT has happened to our country? And why is NO ONE following our constitution anymore???? How are polititians on both sides letting this happen? WHO is making all of this money and why is it okay with us? Why are we cannibalizing our neighbors? I realize I am preaching to the choir with you, but I can't believe this is happening!!!

Reply

Kelly

11:28 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

@Diane @Reagan: Oh come on! The entire world was scammed by the financial industry--thus the GLOBAL recession. My guess is that you lost money too in your own retirement account. Blaming working class citizens and the school boards when we should be blaming the politicians on both sides for allowing this to happen is just stupid and partisan! Do you really think that the threat to our economy is coming from people who make less than 250K per year when the top 2% makes billions of dollars?

Watch the "Inside Job," and bring yourself up to speed. Your views are archaic. Middle class people have seen their worth decline by 23% while the top 2% has seen their wealth increase by 400%. The fact that most politicians and their corporate backers want us to hate our neighbor rather than arguing for more of the pie ourselves, is the downfall of this country. As working class citizens, we should be making 23% more by now than we were 30 years ago. Instead, we are making less in relation to inflation.

Growing up, we learned that firefighters, cops, nurses and teachers were the good guys and that is still true. That the top 2% wants to vilify them is evidence that the billionaires on both political sides want to cannibalize this country even more than they already are. How sick.

Reply

Kelly

11:32 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

@Peyton: Congratulations on playing into the hands of the rich.

Reply

Tiffany

11:36 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

LOL
So sad you are.....
One to many cups of coffee this morning. Take a deep breath.

Reply

Kelly

11:58 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

@Payton: You are right, I do feel sad about what has happened to our country, our state and our community. I agree to disagree, but to dismiss me outright shows that your mind is closed to the big picture of what is happening right now. You would rather call me "sad" than to step out of your partisan comfort zone and consider that other sources of information might be true. G0od luck with that.

Reply

Diane

1:08 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Heard on the radio..... there are twice as many government jobs as manufacturing jobs.....

AT&T, Verizon, and GE took subsidy $$$ to fund their OWN healthcare.

Where are we going?????

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kelly

2:02 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Yes, and GE even got a tax rebate after paying no taxes on 14 Billion! And teachers are the enemy...Go figure.

Diane

2:59 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Reform needs to start somewhere - state employees have had lush benefits for years - at the expense of the tax payers.

Reply

Dan B

6:57 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Kelly, the tax rebate is from your messiah to his cronies at these big companies for supporting him. This comes right out of working tax payers pockets. Here is a link to information from the Washington Examiner.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_040411/content/01125109.guest.html

It is from Rushes web site but it has the tex of the article. Many of you on here should spend alot of time on this site and actually read it instead of what your union or lafty leaders spew because most of them never listened or read anything from his radio or site.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kelly

7:30 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Obama is our President and deserves respect--however, I do disagree with him on many issues. Also, speaking of favors, Gov. Walker gave an 81K job to a 27 year old without a college degree or real work experience because his dad is a lobbyist--how do you feel about that, or is that all okay with you? Bet you wish your daddy could have done that for you....

sanchez

9:06 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

"Obama is our President and deserves respect"

like the respect that the democrats had shown to GW jr in the past? Like the respect Obama has for "working together" when he called those who disagreed with the democrat agenda "the enemy".
Obama gets no respect from me, the enemy, and his agenda is disgusting.

I dont agree with Walkers choice to hire that 27 yr old kid. At least I am not a hypocritical liberal and bash people for not finishing college, bash someone for having DWIs, then turn around and vote for Chris Abele just because he is a liberal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRod

12:09 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

When did he say they were the enemy?

sanchez

9:11 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

"And teachers are the enemy...Go figure."

No, union bosses are the enemy and taking taxpayer money and giving it to the democrats is sickening.

Teachers that want to defend the union bosses from the taxpayers are just feeling the taxpayers wrath. Solution: dont get in the way.

Reply

Reagan's Disciple

9:11 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Phone calls for Prosser went great again tonight!!!

Also good news that the Journal/Sentinel endorsed Prosser over his opponent! Wow! I never thought I would see that. I guess their editorial board even knows how unqualified Klopp is.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRod

12:07 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

According to you guys the Journal is worthless. Now you are changing your oppinion based on convinience. Now they are competent. If tomorrow they say they made a mistake and they are actually endorsing someone else, they go back to incompetent. Buth then if the next day they say that it was a typo and they do endorse Prosser, they are geniouses again. But then.......whatever....

Kelly

9:30 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

@Sanchez: GW jr was President and deserved respect too. ANY President deserves respect, although we all have the freedom in this country to have our own opinions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

9:49 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Respect is earned, not just given. Mr. Obama has done nothing to earn respect, from his racist "The Police acted stupidly" remarks when the Black Harvard Professor was in the wrong to his "Spread the welth around" socialist agenda this man has done nothing worthy of a conservatives respect.

Kelly

9:53 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

The office of President of the United States of America deserves respect. Period.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

4:40 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

The OFFICE deserves respect....not the PERSON. The person has to EARN the respect...
THIS PERSON has not earned my respect.

Jim Perry

9:58 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Take us off of your mailing list!!

Reply

JRod

11:49 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

@Fiscal Conservative, thank you for the links you posted to prove that MSNBC has maliciously doctored video but they don't prove that. In my post, I specifically said "doctored video". You provided me with links that address the report of erroneous information instead. Even though you got off track a little bit, let me say that in most of these cases I don't think the information was maliciously misreported. There were cases of failure to confirm or verify the information source. This is different than going out of your way to play with video with the intention of misreporting. The one I see is should have never happened was the one about the donations. I can's see how she could have come up with numbers that were so different.

Please, don't say Fox News is the most balanced source. We can't have serious discussions if you make statements like that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Conservative

4:59 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

WE can't have a serious discussion because YOU are so deluded by your socialistic lefty ideas that it makes it impossible to take you seriously.

BTW, try to read before you respond. I know you're so worked up, like a pimple faced virgin about to have sex for the first time, when your getting ready to post your condescending drivel, that actually reading the posts might detract from your gratification, but you should notice the post of your's that I responded to with the links??? You only talked about MSNBC never having to retract a story. Oh well, facts and honesty have never ben Libs strong suits.

JRod

12:00 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

@Fiscal Conservative, Barack Obama inherited a huge mess from the Bush administration. Having to deal with that, alone should earn your respect. On top of that he incrased our military forces in Afghanistan which is a conservitive's dream come true, he extended the Bush tax cuts to the rich, he compromised by leaving the public option out of the health bill, he has not taken a role in defense of the union workers, he is eliminating programs for the poor. What else do you want? He is more conservative than Reagan was.

If you think he is a socialist, you are not considering all the facts.

Reply

JRod

12:18 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Dan B, I am going to pretend you did not say you used Rush L as your source of information.

Reply

sanchez

12:34 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

in an interview with Univision radio, Obama urged Hispanic votes for Democrats, and said: "If Latinos sit out the election instead of, 'we're going to punish our enemies and we're going to reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us' -- if they don't see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it's going to be harder."

is the friend Obama intends to award GE? Sure looks like they are reaping the rewards from their campaign donation.

Reply

sanchez

12:40 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

JRod, Obama hasnt taken a role in much at all. Oh wait I forgot about his final four picks, my bad.

You should also correct your statement: "Barack Obama inherited a huge mess from the Bush administration AND the Pelosi congress. " Coincidence that things seriously took a turn for the worse after the Pelosi regime took office?

Reply

Diane

6:47 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

@ Reagan. Good to hear the calls went well again Monday night. They did Sunday as well. Anxiously waiting for the results!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

JRod

10:35 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

@ Sanchez Why do you take a statement that Obama made about immigration and use it in this blog to make an unrelated point about GE. I am going to assume you didn't know that because otherwise you would have been trying to deceive me and I don't think you would have been trying to do that. Maybe you have a p9oint, wrong choice of word because if you read the transcript you notice that only Rush and Beck would be able to make this sound like an attrocity.

Reply

JRod

11:08 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

@ Sanchez again, the same month that Obama became president Rush L said that the recesion was the "Obama's Recession". So here is a major conservative information source saying as fact what is absurd. Your comment about Pelosi is not quite as bold but in a similar neighborhood. I will reluctanly make you an offer. Pelosi was in power for about 18 months when all hell broke loose. For you to make a Pelosi statement like that you have to ignore the balanced budget he inherited and the prior six years that Bush was president. Let's say then that the fault falls 60 Bush 40 Pelosi. My last offer.

Reply

JRod

11:54 am on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

@Karen Pierce, if the Dem 14 broke the law, why haven't there been penalized in any of the many ways available. Can you please shed some light on this? Thank you in advance.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

12:08 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

JRod - you're asking me this why?

Tiffany

12:02 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

I am thinking it's the same reason Katherine W has not been charged for sending a SERIOUS DEATH THREAT to WI senators.
They are all above the law .. at least in their minds.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kelly

4:15 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Where do you get your info? She was charged with 2 felonies! Did Rush forget to mention that? Boy he sure knows how to get you guys riled up with his BS. He's called a shock jock for a reason. You've all been duped. Oh nevermind, you like it like that.

Comment_arrow

Rick

5:33 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

from Diane....
she may have been charged, but she is free having had to post no bail.

Diane

3:55 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Notice to PROSSER supporters:
There is a message today on Facebook on the I STAND WITH SCOTT WALKER page:

ALERT!: WE NEED VOLUNTEERS TOMORROW--PLEASE CONTACT info@justiceprosser.com with your name/county/phone/e-mail . Help stop voter fraud!

We will do what we can to help.

Reply

Tiffany

4:05 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Thnx Diane !!!
I will check that out..
I just heard ballot shredding has taken place at one polling location(probably more)...what a surprise ! ARGH !!

Reply

Kelly

4:18 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

You mean the Republicans were caught cheating again? Bummer. Might have to go to those hanging chads in the future to get ahead. (Wink)

Reply

Tiffany

4:21 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

No class what so ever...no surprise there. (wink)

Reply

Karen Pierce

4:47 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

OMG...Kloppy sounds as dumb as she looks...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rick

5:34 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

from Diane.....

Did you notice her cheeks getting redder and redder as she answered questions? She looked pretty nervous to me. She said she did not have plans to resign from her former position. Wouldnt it be great if she did resign and then found out that the votes turned in favor of PROSSER?

sanchez

5:10 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

wow, you liberals sure talk about Rush and FoxNews a hell of a lot more than us conservatives do, or at least my circle of friends and family.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rick

5:37 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

from Diane...

Mequon defended the worker... that it was an honest mistake. uh huh.

Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

5:46 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Imagine what the huge outraged public outcry would be had these been KLOPPY'S votes that were destroyed!!! Since they weren't, of course, it was just "an honest mistake".

They oughta make that district revote.

Kelly

5:50 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

PRISSY just can't handle losing. Just like you can't handle name-calling unless it is a republican doing it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diane

5:55 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

@ Kelly
you found some more adjectives

Kelly

6:00 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

But Karen can say Kloppy and it's all okay, right. Really?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Pierce

6:41 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

@Kelly - Wakey wakey, let's pay attention here...NEITHER "Prissy" NOR "Kloppy" has lost yet. No winner has been declared -- which means - stay with me here - no LOSER has been declared yet either.
DOH!!!!

JRod

6:00 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

@Sanchez, Rush has no counterpart to compare to. Amuse me. Tell me who you think is our liberal "Rush".

Reply

Kelly

6:04 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

I get it now. Anything over six letters in it and suddenly you guys forget how to spell. No wonder Ellie May won. Stupid is as stupid does.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

6:25 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

@ Kelly, you were saying.....? I can't stop laughing at your people. Good thing you don't want to do anything about changing elections here in WI. Keep up the good work lefties. HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Guess you're just gonna have to get those bongos and birkenstocks back out of the closet. Also, might I suggest that you spend lots of time and energy in an effort to recall Mary Lazich? Please Please Please keep trying, I love the entertainment.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

6:30 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

....and before you liberals start saying the Repubs cheated, the Democrat canvass person just said everything was on the up and up in Brookfield. Either way, can we all agree we need election reform here in WI?

Reply

Tiffany

7:50 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

Lets see..
Obama said to Klopburg DENIED
Doyle said to Klopburg DENIED
Wisconsin 2011 said to Klopburg DENIED
Sorry, time to hop back on the broom & fly back to the land of OZ

Reply

Tiffany

7:49 am on Friday, April 8, 2011

Ok I was caught up in the moment.....that was just mean. I take it back !!
The broom part, not the denied part !!

News of the Prosser lead last night.
PRICELESS !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diane

4:15 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011

Priceless indeed! I wondered if my neighbors heard me hoot when I heard the news! Good things are worth waiting for. I cant wait for this to finish playing out so that we hear another speech from Kloppenburg.

JRod

4:09 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011

@everyone, can we all do the following exercise; pull out your wallets look for the plastic named Wisconsin Driver's License and pay particular attention to the date in red, more specifically the last four digits, determine your age and then review YOUR own posts in this blog. The last part is the most important, see if the posts you made are consistent with the determined age and should there be a discrepancy you might seriouly consider u might want to consider contacting MVD to receive a corrrected document. Finally, next time one of our kids behave in a way we might not understand for heir age, let's take it easy on them.

Reply

Leave a comment