Roger Patton was implicated by the mayor and Lynn Gaffey in the keying of the former BID Director's car. What, specifically, was the alderman's role in this action?

Not sure schmidt--what was yours?

Now that you are implicated please prove your innocence.

I would, if Lynn and the mayor had thrown me under the bus. But they named Roger, not me.

This question is specifically for the candidates in district 12. The aldermanic position is supposed to be non-partisan. Why is one of the candidates using his views on the Walker situation as a issue? This city is already divided and I feel that those comments do nothing but further divide us and are totally out of line. Are you, as elected officials supposed to represent the views of the people that elected you, regardless of your personal political views?

Easy. If you didn't want your position to be public record, you shouldn't have signed. But public record is public record, so why not inform the electorate of the differences between the candidates? Especially when one, to date, has said and done nothing to inform the District of his views? The only thing I know about Mr. Krivos is that he signed the Walker Recall Petition. He has not done anything else to educate the District about where he stands, or what his views/thoughts/opinions are.

Although not the perfect forum to address this, I will anyway since I'm sure this won't come up tomorrow night. Ron you are correct, the position is non-partisan. JMS is also correct in that Mr. Krivos publically showed his support for the recall of Gov. Walker and that is the only difference any of us know as fact since Mr. Krivos has not been campaigning like myself. Noting the recall in my letter was not partisan but a way to note a difference in how an elected official would approach balancing a budget. I agree with not raising taxes or laying off workers as Gov. Walker did to make ends meet in government. This is a difference in myself and Mr. Krivos, it is my duty to point that out.

I appreciate that one everyone will agree with me but I'm confident that most will. I'm more than happy to have a private discussion on these items in the future if you so choose.

Krivos signed the recall petition. This is a good indication of how he will govern and his political philosophies. Furthermore, you would think that someone who owns a restaurant in the city (Key Westconsin) would be smarter than that and not try to alienate 50% of his customer base.

People can sign petitions if they want to. This is America in the 21st century, where we have a right to express our political views. Rather than try to witch hunt signers (shame on you) why not see why people felt so strongly to sign and build bridges? Good for anyone that stands up for what they feel is right. Shame on anyone who condemns them simply for having a different stance. That is not the American way.

And, by the way, if Walker does run for governer AND national office like Palin, who will pay for the second governor election? We will. That would make 3 elections for one man for one term. Just a thought...for those against the recall for tax reasons.

What are the candidates feelings on the need for moving a fully operational fire station from Sentry Dr. to the corner of 59 and Oakdale? Are they aware of how many homes are outside of the perfect time response window and does this number justify the cost?

Do the candidates believe Act 10 was a positive step forward in cost reduction for the city or just a way to stifle the income growth of hard working public employees?

Thanks, everyone for your questions...I will definitely ask some of these at tonight's forum! Hope to see you there, but if you can't make it, we're going to have a live, real-time blog on Waukesha Patch.