FAA Closes Waukesha County Airport Traffic Control Tower
The Waukesha County traffic control tower is one of 149 towers being shut down across the nation. A total of eight towers are being shut down in Wisconsin.
The Waukesha County Airport/Crites Field traffic control tower is being shut down, along with 148 other towers across the country due to federal budget cuts.
The Federal Aviation Administration announced the closures on Friday. Other Wisconsin airport towers that are being shut down include La Crosse, Janesville, Oshkosh, Milwaukee (Timmerman), Kenosha, Eau Claire and Mosinee.
Waukesha is the third busiest airport in Wisconsin. Airport General Manager Kurt Stanich told Waukesha Now the airport has 60,000 takeoffs and landings a year, adding the cuts are “unnecessary.”
Waukesha County Supervisor Michael Crowley believes that closing of the "tower could jeopardize aviation safety and efficiency for the 200 aircraft based at Waukesha County Airport, which conduct 55,000 takeoffs and landings each year."
The FAA told Waukesha County Airport they are choosing to close airport towers based on the degree to which the air traffic control tower affects the “national interest,” reported General Aviation News.
The FAA will continue to fund Wisconsin airports that have commercial airline traffic.
“The bottom line is Contract Towers are safer and save money," said Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Menomonee Falls, in a release. "The FAA must reevaluate its decision, and the White House must put an end to its political charade. On March 14, several of my colleagues and I sent a letter to FAA Administrator Michael Huerta questioning these closures despite considerable wasteful spending at FAA. I intend to send a follow-up letter inquiring how much taxpayer money is being spent on the FAA’s Airport Improvement Program."
Dirk Gutzmiller
5:21 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013
Just raise the fees on the users of the airport to cover the loss of the taxpayers' financial support.
I thought we wanted smaller government.
Greg
6:42 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013
What fees?
Annie Nominous
1:10 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Hey Dirk - I have an idea...how about "big" government cut entitlements to capable citizens who have become generationally reliant on welfare, Quest (free food) cards, free medical services, housing subsidies, free phones (nicer than I own), etc., and allow the local corporations, who heavily use Crites Field for their corporate flights, to continue to fly their customers and employees in and out of the airfield SAFELY. The local corporations do much more for the local and state economy than the federal government could ever dream of!
Dirk Gutzmiller
3:07 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
@Greg - Good point...you mean there are no fees, they can fly their corporate planes in there for nothing?
Dirk Gutzmiller
4:14 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
@Annie - You paint such a rosy picture of poverty, why do we all fear becoming poor so much, with all those wonderful benefits? Because poverty, in so many ways, sucks way, way beyond the support society provides. Please tell us, where did you get your inoculation making you, Annie, immune from ever being poor someday?
TOM
8:41 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013
Just stop feeding the cradle to grave parasites and turn off the free telephones for parasites that would be a lot of money freed up
Barb V
1:39 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Hey- Tom & Annie....When these "parasites" do work, how about they get paid enough so they CAN survive? The current minimum wage is a joke.
I know two 21 yr. old's. Both are High School Grads. Neither chose to go to a 4yr. college, which of course automatically means they are losers, right? They have gone to EVERY restaurant in Menomonee Falls, GT and many other places looking for ANY work. When they do get hired, they are offered $8/hr. and 30 hours or less per week. They can't get a 2nd or 3rd job because they are constantly given erratic hours. One week it's 6am to 1pm. Tues & Thurs. the next week 10am to 2pm and 5pm to 7pm for 5 days so scheduling a 2nd or 3rd job is impossible. If a supervisor is annoyed with them, their hours get reduced. With rents over $600/month, non existent health, dental or eye care, gas at $3.50/gal. no public transportation, what are young people who don't have the benefit of growing up with a silver spoon in their mouth supposed to do? Please tell me?
red
2:14 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Back when the economy was good these fast food restaurants would have offered above minimum wage because there was competition for labor. Now that we are in permanent recession workers are competing for jobs.
Of course - when peole follow Obama's lead and indulge in class warfare (e.g. calling economically disadvantaged "parasites" - we are not referring to honest people who can't get onto the first rung in our economy. Instead we are referring to those who make the choice to not try. Our culture used to really approve of all work as meaningful and ennobling. Now libs have demeaned work and excused dependency. This is damaging to our culture and to those in whom liberals have encouraged dependency. Unlike Obama, we would like to see the economy grow to give the kids you cite a chance to begin their working lives.
It is sad that your acquaintances are not able to find permanent jobs. The vast majority of minimum wage jobs are (used to be) kids though and are living at home so they don't need higher wages. My kids have struggled and they were forced to move home. Perhaps your acquaintences are making bad decisions.
atthec44
6:13 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
"they are offered $8/hr. and 30 hours or less per week."
This couldn't have anything to do with Obamacare requiring that employers provide insurance to employees working more than 30 hours per week, could it?
Annie Nominous
1:44 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013
The Obama administration wants to create visible chaos because of the 'sequestration'...the premature release of thousands of illegal immigrant detainees on U.S. streets, the closing of strategic air traffic control towers, etc....citizen safety and national security take a back seat to politics. The federal government could easily cut expenses in non-critical areas, if they sincerely desired.
Barb V
1:46 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
I have a daughter, that is visually impaired. She is another "Parasite" who gets her health insurance and prescriptions paid for. I guess because she's "defective" and will likely be a parasite all her life, she should have been euthanized at birth? She REALLY ENJOYS that $700 a month she gets to live on plus the $200 in food stamps. You would think that because her disability is caused by her vision impairment that the insurance would cover eye exams and glasses, right? It does not. She lives in a tiny 1 bedroom run down apartment on 13th and Dakota in Milwaukee with her boyfriend who does work full time (for $9/hr.) and they BARELY make it. She'd live out here but there is nowhere that has heat included for $500/month like she has now, plus she needs access to public transportation which is extremely limited around here. Her cupboards and fridge are mostly empty. In her adult life she has never been on a vacation other than an over night camping trip with friends.
By the way, the above mentioned young people would LOVE to find out about those free phones you all are talking about...
Barb V
1:49 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
The disabled people I know would LOVE to get a job and get themselves out of poverty, but if they do, do you know that they then lose their SSI insurance AND for every dollar they earn, they loses that same amount in their monthly SSI benefit? There needs to be a complete reorganization of SSI, where individuals can GRADUALLY lose their benefits until they can earn enough income to support themselves. Right now there is NO incentive to get off SSI. How can one jump from no skills, a disability or impairment of some sort that prevents a conventional work experience into being completely self supporting?
Annie Nominous
5:15 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Barb V - I never used the word "parasites." There is a reason the economy is so bad for so many, especially young adults...look who most of them voted for. I think you need to direct your anger in the right direction.
red
2:17 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Yes, Barb wants this to be about parasites and people she knows rather than how our government catastrophically mispends money. Anybody hear about the Nat Inst Drug Abuse spending 3.6 million on studying monkeys smoking PCP and Meth?
http://menomoneefalls.patch.com/articles/faa-closes-waukesha-county-airport-traffic-control-tower?ncid=newsltuspatc00000001#comment_6794583
Ian
7:04 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Very true Annie !! Nice job. How about Obama closing the White House tours? Let the school kids and tourists suffer the "pain" of sequestration....
At the same time:
From the Weekly Standard:
"Vice President Biden and his entourage spent a little time in London in early February during his first foreign trip of the second term of the Obama administration. A document released today revealed that the cost of lodging in London alone was close to half a million dollars. The contract was awarded on January 30, 2013 to the Hyatt Regency London for a total of $459,388.65."
"As it turns out, Vice President Joe Biden's London stay in February was not the most expensive part of his trip. A government document released on February 14, 2013 shows that the contract for the Hotel Intercontinental Paris Le Grand came in at $585,000.50."
Let the everyday people suffer while Obama and Biden spend taxpayer dollars as fast as the Fed Reserve can print it!
Any hypocrisy here??
Ian
7:06 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013
By the way, Biden's $585,000.50 Paris hotel tab was only for a one night stay !!!!
Ian
7:11 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Also at the same time:
Obama's Golf Weekend this past February in Florida With Tiger Woods Cost As Much As 341 Federal Workers Furloughed.
Ian
7:22 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Just these three trips alone could have funded and kept the White House tours going for approximately 3 years!!
But no, a weekend with Tiger for Obama and a London and Paris hotel tab for Biden set the taxpayers back over $2,000,000.00
Mind you, those were only Biden's hotel tabs, not including plane costs!
Yes, two million dollars total!
Annie Nominous
11:54 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Excellent points, Ian! Sadly, with the liberal mainstream media as part of the Obama administration, the average person only notices the chaos (and they never blame Obama) because the full story and information and facts, such as you posted, are rarely read or heard by the majority of the citizens, who only follow mainstream, biased news reports and only hear sensationalized news sound-bites. After all, Obama is such a nice guy...and such a great father...and so smart...and a great speaker...and he would never suspend White House tours or release criminals on the streets or make our skies less safe. Meanwhile, the chaos continues...
Dirk Gutzmiller
3:53 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
@Annie - The so-called "liberal" mainstream media have been owned by giant profit-making,, conservative corporations for many years now. You're thinking of the 1950's, like Clark Kent and the Daily Planet in Gotham? And what about Fox and Rupert Murdock, are they "liberal" media. Is the Internet "liberal"? What about hate radio and its many ultraconservative jabberers?
Get over it, that old "liberal" media saw is getting so very tired and antiquated.
red
2:22 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
---The so-called "liberal" mainstream media have been owned by giant profit-making,, conservative corporations for many years now.
Total Trope. The mainstream media continues to cheerlead and protect Democrats and BigGovernment despite mounting losses in viewership and circulation. You guys obsess on Fox News when the truth is Fox is only slightly left of center while the rest of the media is falling off the edge.
This sequester c*&# is just the last example. Only conservative outlets are letting us compare the continuing catastrophic waste of BigGovernment against the hysteric, threatening assessment of what sequester was going to do to 'we the people'. Does one in ten Americans realize that with the sequester we are still spending more money than last year?
Dirk Gutzmiller
5:58 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
@red - Fox is left of center? And the giant media companies are conservative but are supporting Democrats and big government even though they lose money doing so? And all the other mainstream media are falling off the left edge?
The “Liberal Media”, is a tiresome and wholly inaccurate rant that is the centerpiece of right-wing propaganda, and miserably outdated.
red
10:08 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
The “Liberal Media”, is a tiresome and wholly inaccurate rant that is the centerpiece of right-wing propaganda, and miserably outdated.
Dirkster, its all Obama fellation all the time. There are plenty of studies showing the liberal bias of the mainstream media. Your little repetition doesn't change the truth. The media for example ganged up on Romney during the campaign while ignoring gaffes and national security disasters (Benghazi) of the Light Bringer.
As noted by National Review Online, all but one of the questions asked of Gov. Romney had to do with his “tone” and/or whether he thought it was a good idea to criticize the administration’s initial response to the attack on the Cairo embassy.
Not a single reporter asked Romney what he thinks the U.S. should do going forward.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/09/12/hot-mic-moment-reporters-heard-planning-questions-for-romney-before-presser/
As predicted by many on the right, presidential debate moderator Candy Crowley of CNN Tuesday evening came to the aid of President Obama, lending clear support to his effort to deceptively suggest that he had on Sept. 12 characterized the Sept. 11 attack on the Benghazi consulate as terrorism.
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/10/17/crowley-lends-support-obamas-benghazi-deception/
You have to be a low information voter not to see it.
Dirk Gutzmiller
10:25 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013
@red - Oh get off it, get real, you are cherrypicking news stories and acting out as a bad information voter. If anyone turns the radio, and randomly spins the dial, particularly AM, they can listen to any number of ultraconservative radio jabberers, promoting hatred, bigotry, fear and dehumanization. Key modern practitioners include and have included Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin to name a few, and there are many more. They have a license to attack a specific group of people on the public airways without permitting any opportunity for opposing views on the same show or even station. (Unfair and unbalanced in every way.)
And this is not counting most of the "Christian" stations where I have learned that Jesus was ultraconservative politically and supported the moneychangers.
And that is just ultraconservative radio. If space allowed, I could go into TV, the internet and print media. But moderates and liberals are not trying to promote laws to restrict free speech in the media like you.
So get off it red. Your conspiracy theory is apparently a paranoid delusion. You are stuck in the past and reading issues off some Republican issues list from way back,. You would be scary if you were not so irrelevant in these modern times.
Incredulous1
8:28 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Let the airport users pay the freight, enough corporate welfare. If they don't want to pay for it then fly into Mitchell and drive 15 miles or take a cab. I thought conservatives were all about smaller government?
Steve ®
12:02 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Clueless Jim. They already pay for it and have the highest tax rates in the country. Free Obama phones but public safety must be cut. Dictator Obama is having a hissy fit.
Annie Nominous
12:05 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Jim B - Can you please prove that the corporate jets fly in and out of Crites Field without paying any fees? And have you no understanding of the economic impact that GE Medical and Quad Graphics, etc., have on the local economy (Economics 101 - this means primary and secondary jobs for local people and related businesses). Smaller government does not equate to stupid government. Obama handed out a lot of taxpayer money (an additional 155 million, bringing the total to 365 million U.S. dollars in foreign aid) on his recent overseas trip, yet you are stuck on the corporate welfare blame game? Please, give us facts to back up your posting.
Dirk Gutzmiller
3:33 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
@Annie - I have flown on corporate jets on business, and often, there is a limousine waiting on the tarmac. It is convenient, saves some travel time, and is generally more comfortable than commercial flights..
And you are trying to tell us, the taxpayers, we should pay for high dollar executives with millions in stock options so that they are not slightly put out by flying first class commercial, or just using Mitchell for their corporate planes? Corporate planes are often just ego trips, and not necessary.
Something very odd about feeling sorry for these overpaid suits who are often leeching perks off stockholders and the hard work and success of their employees, let alone the taxpayer issue.
Annie Nominous
4:42 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
To Dirk Gutzmiller: What world are you living in when you cannot plainly see the difference in the mainstream news coverage concerning liberal politicians vs. conservative politicians? Much news is conveniently 'omitted' or not investigated when it comes to Obama and his administration. What the mainstream media did to George W. Bush doesn't even come close to their glossed-over coverage of the current, most NON-transparent president in my lifetime. Dream on, Dirk.
Annie Nominous
4:54 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Dirk - you admit you have flown on corporate jets, and oftentimes, with a limo waiting on the tarmac? So when you made use of the private jet system, I guess it was okay then? Were you doing this in a purely volunteer capacity and paying for your air ticket or was the evil corporation sharing their profits with you and paying you, feeding you, and providing your air travel? Most people will never fly on a corporate jet in their lifetimes, but those people that do fly on corporate jets usually employ many people.
Steve ®
7:36 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
We should cut the FAA towers so the sky's are less safe for everyone, right Dirk? Maybe the evil rich should have their own private police service too. They call 922 instead. You're making silly arguments here trying to defend a failed leaded and ideology.
They pay for the leaches receiving free phones and food and strippers and pay for the entire police and FAA public safety departments. Cry more.
Dirk Gutzmiller
10:37 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013
@Annie - I got some rides on corporate jets because higher executives made the arrangements and wanted me along for some meetings. I have been there, corporate flying is generally a convenience and questionable use of shareholder and taxpayer money. It is also less safe, I have been on corporate flights where I was sitting in the co-pilot seat as a passenger.
You need to get a fresh approach. All the uber conservative commenters try to find some kind of hypocrisy when liberals or moderates disagree with them. When, as you demonstrate, the Tea Party's ox gets gored, as with these optional control towers, they scream like stuck pigs for restoration of goverment funding.
Dirk Gutzmiller
10:48 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013
@Steve - The corporations and rich individuals can easily fund a private arrangement for taking off and landing their planes. They do not need to rely on hardworking middle class taxpayers to fund their perks and ego trips. Why do you get so upset when lack of government funding touches the lives of the rich and famous? You consistenly come across as a servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people, to put it graciously.
Dirk Gutzmiller
10:59 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013
@Annie - Your argument about the "liberal" media dates to at least Richard Nixon. Since then, there are now hundreds of cable tv channels, many, many hate talk radio stations, satellite radio for the car, the internet, etc. You can literally choose your own news source 24/7. You are obviously getting this "liberal media" thing from some "conservative media" source, like Fox, Rush or his many aspirants. There is an abundance of such "conservative media" like this today. We do not have just 3 networks anymore, Granny. Get with it.
red
2:24 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
I believe that JimB has a point. I think studies do show that General Aviation fees are lower than Commercial Aviation when infact GA is more resource intensive. Increasing these fees then could be an example of corporate welfare that should be eliminated. Government has to get smarter and more fair in all ways.
red
2:28 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
---There is an abundance of such "conservative media" like this today. We do not have just 3 networks anymore, Granny. Get with it.
Sure, but your Democratic liberal low-information voters (who voted uniformly for our Socialist president only get there news from the Big 3, Jimmy Fallon, David Letterman and Jon Stewart.
KKM
9:49 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Use it, pay for it or lose it.
Annie Nominous
12:11 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
KKM - are you referring to Obamacare?
Annie Nominous
5:09 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013
Dirk G. - one last word...if you politically resent and control and regulate successful and profitable US businesses, then you will see layoffs and job cuts and companies leaving the country. It is already happening. Check out www.dailyjobcuts.com
Community Lady
1:09 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Annie,
Sounds great! Let's cut all welfare for business, then. Have a REAL free market. That's what you're saying, right? No subsidies, no welfare, for anyone, any person, any entity?
For example, no tax loopholes for corporations who outsource jobs overseas. We need that money here. All other legal persons have to pay their fair share.
What a relief! That will definitely help balance the national budget. Would you mind writing McConnell and Boehner? After all, there are three branches of government....sillies!
And somewhere in the middle, the twain have met.
red
2:32 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Would you mind writing McConnell and Boehner? After all, there are three branches of government....sillies!
Right... there's plenty of corporate welfare being initiated by Democrats too. By the way has Obama reversed shipping jobs overseas? His energy and pro-labor policies are resisting the energy driving trend of bringing jobs back to the US.
http://mhlnews.com/archive/shale-gas-could-lower-us-manufacturing-costs-drive-re-shoring
Annie Nominous
12:11 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Dirk and Community Lady - From reading your posts, your ideal America would be that everybody is equal...we all live in the same type of house (apartment), we all take public transportation or else everyone is guaranteed a government-issued sub-compact car, we all eat the same kind of basic food - bread, milk, and occasional meat; everyone is paid the same wage - either from working for the government or from a government welfare program, government controls all media, government owns and operates one national (and the only) airline, school children will be fed three meals/day at the government-run schools, and the government controls all businesses so no evil corporations can make any profits, except of course, for the government. We are very close to government-run healthcare, so your dreams may come true. Yipee! Oh yes, and any sugary drink over 16 oz. will be banned, and websites, such as this one, will no longer be allowed to publish people's opinions.
red
2:34 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Conservative deficit hawk Sen. Tom Coburn tried yesterday to shrink a federal program that uses taxpayer money to help U.S. companies advertise and sell agricultural products overseas. But look at the vote breakdown: Republicans voted 28 to 18 to cut the program. Democrats voted 51-to-2 against the cuts, thus siding with the agribusiness lobby.
Lets all pay attention and force both parties to end corporate welfare.
red
2:37 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
meant to provide a link where Democrats voted FOR corporate welfare.
Oh, further examples.... Obama giving big green energy subsidies to campaign donors, who's companies fail at an alarming rate though the donors never lose money.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/11/13/how-obama-s-alternative-energy-programs-became-green-graft.html
red
4:06 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
No - BigGovernment can't cut any costs............
Vice President Biden has been flying home to Wilmington, Delaware most weekends at enormous expense to taxpayers, even though he has an exclusive government-provided residence in Washington.
Biden himself acknowledged the flights during recent remarks to the National Association of Attorneys General, noting that the sequester would force him to temporarily alter his expensive habit and use the train instead.
Not fit for the weekends
Not fit for the weekends
According to reports, Biden generally uses Air Force Two to get to Wilmington.
The cost of flying Air Force Two, a military version of the Boeing 757-200, amounts to about $8,800 per hour, according to the most recent federal data.
The distance between Washington and Wilmington is only about a hundred miles, but it’s safe to assume that between flying time and the time spent on the takeoff and landing, the total flight takes at least 45 minutes. That would amount to a roundtrip cost to taxpayers of about $13,200.
This price still is conservative, though, because it doesn’t include the cost of transporting Biden to and from the plane, both in Washington and Delaware.
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2013/03/23/biden-flying-home-weekends/
red
4:06 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Duh, could Biden motorcade for 100 miles with maybe 6 secret service escorts?
Ron Taylor
4:28 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, Inc.
(PATCO
For Immediate Release
"Air Safety at Risk"
The decision by Secretary of Transportation, Ray LaHood and Federal Aviation Administrator (FAA), Michael Huerta, to close down 149 Federal Contract Towers (FCT’s) due to sequestration is unjustified, absurd and needs to be stopped. The FCT program has been around for almost 30 years and has been lauded by the DOT’s Inspector General as highly efficient, cost effective and safe.
The Air Traffic Controllers that man these towers are highly professional, and meet or exceed the same jobs requirements as FAA controllers. They provide a critical service at their respective community airports to ensure that "air safety" is the number one priority.
Contrary to what the FAA says, the closing of these towers will seriously jeopardize "air safety" and the overall efficiency of the National Airspace System (NAS). The "No Margin for Error" slogan is out the door because the control towers will not be manned.
Beyond the tower closure, the rippling effect will cause, serious delays, confusion and loss of revenues to local airports and the business community as a whole.
The FAA's decision to close control towers is wrong, and their sanity on this issue should be called into question.
Ron Taylor
President
PATCO
www.patco81.com
Annie Nominous
6:10 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Yes, there are great risks involved. And some of these airports affected have commercial flights. Windshear (microbursts) alerts, for example, are transmitted from the air traffic control tower to the pilots because the sensors are on the ground around the airport. Also, many future (commercial) pilots learn to fly in and out of smaller airports. This is all about "creating visible chaos" by those in power in response to sequestration (suspending White House tours, releasing thousands of illegal detainees into the streets, etc.) This also adversely affects medical flights (seriously-ill people/organ transplants). Just because a person is not directly affected by the closures, and also resents private aircraft and hates profitable corporations, does not mean that person will not eventually be affected by these closures (safety, economically, medically, shortage of future pilots, etc.)
Dirk Gutzmiller
10:45 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Strange bedfellows indeed. Annie Nominous and the Teamsters Union. Just goes to show, a Tea Partier will go to great lengths and jump chasms to get or preserve government funding for their own perks and entitlements.
Annie Nominous
2:23 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Dirk - you are the one person posting on this story that actually has enjoyed the "perks" of corporate jet travel, yet you name-call and accuse falsely because you have no valid points to counter the truth of the matter. Enjoy your socialist utopia that is encroaching this country by the day. I have no connection to Crites Field and its "perks," but I do care about the local economy, and now even more highly trained, technical employees, and other support jobs, will be getting cut due to the planned closure of the Crites Field tower. Additionally, local companies could possibly relocate (out-of-state) if local transportation is not optimal...it is called running a business and making a profit to pay the employees, Dirk. (GE Medical, Quad Graphics, Johnson Controls, Northwestern Mutual, Manpower, Kohl’s Corp., Harley-Davidson, Rockwell Automation and Fiserv, Inc., etc.)
red
10:15 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013
Many airports have towers that are not staffed. The pilots revert to visual flight rules. This is the administration calling out the boogeyman and the media playing along. Timmerman in Milwaukee - Really? I would never guessed that it was staffed. How many flights a day?
Annie Nominous
2:14 am on Monday, March 25, 2013
red - Go park your car by this airport and observe...you may be surprised! It is a busy airport relative to its size. Remember...future pilots have to begin training somewhere and it is not Mitchell or O'Hare or La Guardia, etc..