patching...
Update: Worried about your commute? Check out our traffic map. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Democrats Calling for Hearings, Probes into Nickolaus' Election Results

The Democratic Party of Wisconsin asked state elections officials to review Waukesha County's results in the 2006 state Attorney General election amid questions about ballots cast.

 

The Democratic Party of Wisconsin today asked state elections officials to review the Waukesha County vote tally in the 2006 state Attorney General election, after a liberal blogger pointed out there were about 17,000 more votes recorded than ballots cast.

Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus posted an asterisk on the 2006 results on the county's web site, with a note that said votes that are hand-counted and not electronically cast through machines are not included in the ballots cast figure.

In a letter today to the state Government Accountability Board, state Democratic Party chair Mike Tate noted that in the 2006 election, Republican AG candidate J.B. Van Hollen defeated Democrat Kathleen Falk by 8,859 votes out of about 2.1 million votes cast.

The Waukesha County results showed 156,804 ballots cast in the Nov. 7, 2006 election but 174,047 votes cast in the AG race.

"This is an under-reporting of 17,243 votes," Tate wrote. "I note with serious concern that this discrepancy is more than enough to have swung the statewide election against the Republican and for the Democrat."

Tate said the discrepancies "undermine the public's confidence in elections."

Nickolaus' additional note posted on her results posed a question and answer:

"Why would the ballots cast be lower than the number of people that voted in a specific contest or race? The ballots cast would be lower if a portion of the results were entered by hand."

The 2006 race tally was first highlighted by a blogger on the liberal Daily Kos web site.

Also Tuesday, Democratic state lawmakers called on the state's Judiciary and Elections committees to hold hearings to "investigate the results and conduct of elections officials in Waukesha County."

Steel

12:35 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Not including the hand-entered ballots at that time in the total ballot count does make the numbers confusing, but obviously the GAB, et. al. understood/understand it.

Reply

Stella

12:45 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

HOW RIDICULOUS! Let's compare ALL counties from 2006 levels. The people in Waukesha County were FIRED UP and EXERCISED THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE. The "levels" are way off in EVERY COUNTY--this was not a usual election. Why are there 10,000 OVERVOTES in Dane County? The Democrats are seeing this from only their nasty little perspective. There is no fraud here--your unqualified candidate DID NOT WIN. Get over it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nate

2:32 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

Just some free advice, you may want to resist the urge to rely so heavily on capslock in future posts. Also, facts can be a plus.

Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

4:13 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

I can't find any reference to 10,000 overvotes in Dane County except for a couple blog comments without any references. Could you please post a source? Much appreciated.

Comment_arrow

Aldo Raine

2:57 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Yeah, FIRED UP and ready to vote themselves below the poverty line. God forbid if we do anything with MY MONEY to help those imaginary colored people.

John Galt of Muskego

3:55 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Mike Tate...? Gimme a break, that guy is the Alex Jones of WI when it comes to Politics. I for one am glad the Mike Tates of the world are advancing in the Dem Party because it will drive more reasonable people away from the Dems. Did Mike vote mention Stella's comment about the Dane County overvote? Did MIke Tate mention that Milwaukee County often has precincts report more votes for Dems than there are registered voters in the precinct? Did Mike Tate offer any commentary on the "smokes for votes" controversy from Milwaukee from 2000? Did Mike Tate comment on the slashing of tires of GOP get out the vote vans by the offspring of elected Democratic officials in the 2004 election? Face it Mike Tate, you're an impotent leader. Your party threw its best punch, missed, and fell on its face. You offered up an underqualified, wing-nut, with no business of running for the position in an attempt to try to legislate from the bench. Message to Mike Tate, the Democratic Party of WI is imploding and the real middle-class hard working people of the State are rejecting liberalism.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

10:25 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

"Did MIke Tate mention that Milwaukee County often has precincts report more votes for Dems than there are registered voters in the precinct?"

Can you please post a link to the info on Milw county precincts that report more votes for Dems than are registered in the precinct? Milwaukee voter turnout was 41.5% in this Prosser/Kloppenburg election (62.2% in last year's Governors race). So - IF your statement were true - a precinct having more votes for Dems than registered voters would be a big red flag. Maybe I misunderstood.

Comment_arrow

Nate

2:33 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

Dude you crack me up.

Comment_arrow

Aldo Raine

3:02 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Johnny B. Galt, this is brick crapping at its finest. This time the water line almost came up to the door of your little winger cottage. There are more elections to go and we won't see our Governor curbing his enthusiasm any time soon for vengeance and his drive for being a willing Koch puppet.

You might not not being among them, but there are people in this state who are waking up, stretching and looking ready to do something about this confederacy of corporate led dunces.

Comment_arrow

Keith Best

6:32 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

I hope lil' boy Mike Tate remains Chairman of the Democrats for a long, long time, for he is the gift that keeps on giving.

Sara Conrad

4:02 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Van Hollen was again elected in 2010...soooooo.....where's the beef?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nate

4:33 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Waukesha vote totals have asterisks after each election since Kathy Nickolaus arrived (they put the asterisks up yesterday). No asterisks on elections that happened before she took control. The good news is she squealed on her handlers last time she got caught and probably will again this time.

Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

10:27 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Sara, is your point that even if there were vote fraud in 2006 it wouldn't matter, because he was reelected?

Nate

4:28 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

From Forbes, "There have been explanations put forth by various writers suggesting that the count on total voters may not have included absentee ballots, military votes, provisional votes, etc. That’s certainly possible – but would be a far more persuasive argument if confirmed by a County official. Yet, when the Daily Kos blogger phoned the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board, he was told, “We are aware of it, we are looking into it, and we cannot comment on it.” These are hardly comforting words five years after the election in question."
http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2011/04/13/something-smells-in-waukesha-county-wisconsin-and-its-not-the-cheese/

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

4:23 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

I looked at the State records and counted 15,146 absentee ballots including the military and oversees one (plus the 5 provisional ballots). Still not enough. There were 20,846 day-of registrations. That would be just enough, although why election day registrations would not show up as "ballots cast" is beyond me.

2006 Nov Election Detail page 96. http://elections.state.wi.us/docview.asp?docid=11077&locid=47

Nate

4:29 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Remember when the GOP had morals? Me neither.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bescher

7:54 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Yeah Dave that is why there is a lot more voter fraud contributed to the Dems then republicans.
And again and again. The first tally's on Tuesday was not official You people are so thick headed. Only the Wednesday tally where she did come out and make those corrections were the correct AND OFFICIAL ONES

Comment_arrow

Nate

11:17 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Being a republican is easy because you don't have to listen to anybody.

Comment_arrow

Nate

11:26 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Being a republican is great because you don't have to care about anybody.

Comment_arrow

Nate

11:27 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Remember when republicans would actually think and listen before voting? Me neither.

Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

10:39 pm on Monday, April 18, 2011

Hi Bescher,
do you have information on "a lot more voter fraud contributed to the Dems then republicans"? Please post a link. Election fraud is a serious crime, and hurling unsubstantiated claims of Dem fraud does nothing to implicate or absolve Kathy Nickalous.

My hypothetical question for you: IF there were election fraud, would you want it to be caught?

John Galt of Muskego

4:42 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

@DAVE: Dave, sure let's get into a morality discussion. Does the phrase "smokes for votes" ring a bell? How about Al Franken's campaign findings ballots in the trunk of a car? Didn't some kids of elected Democrats in WI get busted for slashing GOP vans' tires? Morality--the party of Robert Byrd? Morality, the party of John Edwards? Morality, the party of Jim Doyle? Sorry Dave, tides are changing and liberalism is being exposed for the festering boil that it is and guys like you can't stand to NOT be able to control the message anymore. If you listen carefully, you can probably hear the world's smallest violin working overtime at my house. And yes, you're "winning" about as much as Charlie Sheen these days--you think you're hot, and you ramble incoherently, all the while being laughed at and rejected

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

4:30 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

John - is your argument that you feel good about election fraud because the Dems do it? or that Dems should not talk about Repub fraud because Dems did it?

These are all still allegations. Factually, when, where, how and especially whether election fraud happened is the most important question. Don't you agree?

It just seems like you are saying: Nickalous did it. Franken did it. who cares?

John Galt of Muskego

4:58 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

@Dave, actually you might have a point. This is interesting......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVFBK9GhS5Q

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nate

8:25 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Maybe you should stick to trolling the Muskego patch.

Jay Sykes

5:03 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Mike Tate et al. are really wearing out their welcome with with me and all of my middle of the road friends. He might be charging up his base, but swing voters are getting annoyed with all of the sore looser games.

Reply

Nate

8:19 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

There is no middle in WI anymore thanks to Walker. Both sides end up hating Switzerland anyways.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

4:32 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

I think the problem is how districting is done. Makes for too many "safe" districts, which the incumbents like, but then our leaders don't have to work with their constituents who have differing opinions.

Nate

8:21 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Glad to hear Palin is visiting WI. Hopefully she'll convince Walker to copy her and QUIT!

Reply
Comment_arrow

WarriorLemming

2:24 am on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Wouldn't that be great, Dave--but Walker's got the Kosh bro's money reving his engine so quiting won't happen (but a recall will)--Palin had stars-in-her-eyes, money was a huge factor with her saying, "See ya, Alaska!". The caliber of elected officials these days when it's blantantly all for money creates cynicism.

Nate

8:22 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Palin and Walker will have a debate to determine who is the absolute worst. governor. ever.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bescher

7:51 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

The worst Gov?
Gee why does Blagojevich get a pass? Oh that's right he is a democrat. Thre have been 9 Governors impeached and removed from office Out of those 9, 7 have been democrats. Neither Palin or Walker have been impeached let alone recalled. So I think your sadly mistaken there lefty

Comment_arrow

Nate

11:18 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Actually, while we're making up statistics, I have one for you. Of the 27 governors who've been impeached 29 of them have been republicans (kathy nickolaus helped me with the math).

Comment_arrow

Brett Hyde

1:52 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

Palin and Walker already got together, and determined the worst governor ever was Jim Doyle.

Sorry Dave, but we are laughing at you, not with you.

Comment_arrow

Nate

2:11 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

Brett you are just so huggable. I bet you stayed up all night thinking up that one. Good effort!

Comment_arrow

Keith Best

6:59 am on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Dave-
The people of WI. know that the worst governor ever was Diamond Jim Doyle. He could have ran again but the reason he didn't was that everyone finally figured out he governed using smoke and mirrors. Once the furor over Governor Walker's budget proposals dies down and people actually get a chance to see them work, and the state is averted from a fiscal meltdown, Walker will be thought of as the right person at the right time. For he believes that we can't spend money that is not there, smaller government is better government, and people create jobs, NOT government.

Nate

8:24 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

BTW it's way too easy irritating you adorable rightwingers. You really are making this too fun.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

8:42 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Yes Dave, I know, so many of you Independent/Moderate, middle of the roaders up until 2 months ago. Thanks for calling me adorable, but I'm straight. Even if I wasn't, washed up hippie retreds aren't my cup of tea.

Reply

Rick

9:18 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

So we are now dredging up election results from 5 years ago? Didn't the GAB certify those elections? Is the system so fouled up that nobody can believe any of the numbers? Take the cheating out of the picture for a minute... look at the process... the precinct notifies the city... the city passes on the information to the county... the county passes it on to the state... Wow... Lets all hop into our horse buggies and run the ballots up to Madison.

How about some serious updating of the election counting process? Why can't a precinct report national and state races to the state, county results to the county and city results to the city? Take all the clerks out of the loop...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

10:44 pm on Monday, April 18, 2011

Rick, this is an interesting idea. I guess since the county clerk is the one who actually runs the election, and there are differences in equipment, that's how this has been done. Don't know. Surely there is a better way. Every time I go to an ATM machine, I get exactly the amount of money I ask for. If we can send a man to the moon...

Nate

9:55 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Yep. "The state's investigation into vote irregularities in Waukesha County will stretch back at least five years, the head of the Government Accountability Board said Thursday."
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/article_46644a68-6704-11e0-907e-001cc4c03286.html

Reply

Nate

9:58 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Walker Under Oath today: "I Don't Even Know Where Cali Is"!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

10:22 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Please tell me you have a link to that!

Comment_arrow

Nate

11:10 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Yep here's the link of Walker saying he doesn't know where Cali is. The real question is whether he can see Canada from his house.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vs-kof9uLg&feature=player_embedded

Nate

10:00 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

#JustKeepsGettingMoreBizarre

Reply

Nate

10:08 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Even though I've seen him, I'm beginning to believe @GovWalker is not real. No one can be that stupid.

Reply

Seth Newman

10:12 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

I looked at the Waukesha numbers (posted by a blogger) from the county level and also the State GAO.

"Summary Report" in Waukesha County "Run date 1/13/08 08:49 AM" (I am not sure where this report actually came from or how it was found, and I do not have the ability to find other similar reports):

Total votes for Falk + Van Hollen + Write in" does add up to 174,047. Governor's race had 176,112 votes counted. "Ballots cast - Total" is listed as 156,804.

The other link posted was "2006 Nov Election Detail" dated mon April 23, 2007
elections.state.wi.us/docview.asp?docid=11077&locid=47

Voters 177,424 (which is enough votes) but specifies Absentee = 15,146 Military absentee returned = 81 Oversees absentee returned = 27 and Provisional ballot counted = 5.

If the Waukesha "summary report" dated 1/13/08 has 156,804 "ballots cast" PLUS presumably the absentee votes of 15,259 from the second document, that totals 172,063. So counting absentee votes, there are still 4,049 votes unexplained (or 4,049 missing voters, depending on how you see it).

If Van Hollen beat Falk by 8,859 out of 2.1 million total votes, the 4,000 extra votes were not the margin of error. That many votes would however take the race from a 0.2% win to a 0.4% win. I wonder if this kind of discrepancy between County voter reports and state data exist routinely, rarely or almost never?

Seth of Wisconsin

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

7:06 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

@Dave, yes, where is the link for the comment you speak of please? I love how the libs keep griping about WI elections but go completely silent when you ask them about any Democratic election issues of the past--including flat out fraud.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nate

11:12 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Most excellent John Galt of Muskego: Here is the link which you requested good sir.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vs-kof9uLg&feature=player_embedded

John Galt of Muskego

7:11 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Ok, I found the link on CSPAN where some hack I've never heard of is getting his day in the sun and referencing the FAKE phone call from the Koch impersonator. The guy on the CSPAN video keeps saying COLLY--what the hell is COLLY please?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

10:20 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

Okay, shall I be annoying and point out that the imposter was saying the most outrageous things and our Governor never smelled a rat?

Maybe the COLLY was Kah-lee-FUH-nyah, the home of the former Governator.

Comment_arrow

Nate

11:23 am on Friday, April 15, 2011

John Galt of Muskego, you are so cute the way you try so hard to ignore any information that could disprove your worn out dogma. Keep that caps lock going ON the unimportant parts of THE story! You rock dude.

sanchez

12:21 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

"Palin and Walker will have a debate to determine who is the absolute worst. governor. ever."

and they will crown Jim Doyle, worst. WI governor. ever.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nate

2:13 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

Awww. Imitation is the highest form of flattery. I think Brett has a crush on sanchez!

sanchez

2:31 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

Dave has nothing worthwhile to say so he resorts to juvenile locker room gay jokes?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nate

2:47 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

The only thing that scares republicans more than their neighbors and public spaces is a hug.

Earl

2:33 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

Walker will end his career as a governor the same way he began his career in county government, through a recall.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bescher

4:23 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

Walker didn't end his county executive job being recalled. He was elected to a higher office. Chris Abele just took over his 1 year left term.

Comment_arrow

Nate

4:56 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

bescher learn how to read, bro.

Diane

7:18 am on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Besher... What Dave meant was that because of Tom Ament (sp) being recalled, Walker had his chance to be elected as Milwaukee County Executive.

I believe Earl is correct on another point, Walker will end his career cleaning up the mess left by a Democrat.

@All... It is about time we start taking our election process more seriously. We were not the spotlight of the nation for voter fraud in 2000 only because Florida was way worse that year. I time in that spotlight may be 2012 if we don't fix the issues that leave our election system (including the canvass process and election night totaling) soon. We need some serious updating and serious efforts to prevent fraud and mistakes.

Reply

Diane

7:21 am on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@All... don't hire me as an editor... especially before i have had my coffee :)

Where i said... "I time in that spotlight..." Should be.. "In time we will be in that spotlight, it may be 2012... "

Sorry for the wonderful pre-caffeine sentence structure.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

8:25 am on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Dave, call me anything you want, but please don't call me cute, its very Barney Frankish creepy. So, you guys are hanging your hat on a bogus phone call? Wow, that's some serious misconduct there. Walker is so in bed with the Koch brothers that he didn't even recognize the guy's voice on the phone? Just face it Dave, Randy etc, you guys have lost the debate about the issues at hand. As I've said before, just come out and say what you really believe in. You can do it like a support group--I will push your names together, likely somewhat erotically for you guys and call you Dave/Randy, "Dandy". "Hi, my name is Dandy and I'm a closet Socialist. I've lost the battle of ideas and the message can no longer be controlled to the sheople. I believe in bigger Govt, higher taxes, less personal accountability, and temper tantrums. My hobbies are demonization, protesting, and poor hygiene. I enjoy long walks around the Capitol while shouting, Michael Moore films, and shopping at Outpost. I like to have Govt think and act for me and to practice confiscatory wealth distribution for the things I believe in. Big, private companies are evil but big Govt should tell us what light bulbs to use. I'm proud when Govt fines someone $500 for dumping their bait in a lake but have never heard the intitials MMSD before. WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER, unless it's Libya...and George Bush made these current gas prices $4/gallon....."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

11:38 am on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Seriously, John, is that the best you have? Ad hominems, slogans, and attacks on personal hygiene?

I'm not hanging my hat on that phone call -- I just think it was damn funny to listen to.

"I will push your names together, likely somewhat erotically for you guys and call you Dave/Randy, "Dandy""

John, are you so insecure in your sexuality that the idea of someone of the same gender checking out your backside sends you into hysteria? Your attempts at homophobia are 'cute'.

John Galt of Muskego

8:37 am on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Seth, my argument is that there was nothing fraudulent about the Brookfield count and the numbers they are using now were actually posted by Patch on election night, but the Dems are trying to roll it into another Capitol building slumber party. The examples I cited from recent Democratic election shenanigans need to be outed because, time and time again massive fraud DOES occur on this side. I am drawing the comparison between real fraud that gets ignored and the Brookfield case which is obviously not fraud but is being blown out of proportion. Here's another example, why were Democrats so ticked off about Deputies guarding the votes that were warehoused for the Milwaukee canvass? Wouldn't they want to protect the sanctity of that canvass? Why has no Dem on this thread addressed any of the issues I presented?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

10:58 pm on Monday, April 18, 2011

Thanks for the response John Galt. I don't know how you can be so 100% positive there was nothing fraudulent about the Brookfield count, but I am VERY interested to see a link to Patch with results posted that night.

I would also appreciate a reference to the issue of Dems being ticked off- I did not know about Deputies guarding votes. Is that usual? Was there something specific that triggered that move to guard votes? Also, I have to ask, were they State Troopers (reporting to Chief Fitzgerald)? thanks for any links you have. I am striking out looking for some of these news stories.

John Galt of Muskego

8:48 am on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Whoever posted the comment about Roger Ebert not likely Atlas Shrugged. I would expect pretty much everyone in the entertainment industry will be disgusted by a story that promotes personal accountability, achievement through hard work and perseverance, Lassez Faire Capitalism, and the shortfalls of Socialistic programs. The more and more a liberal hates something, the more I know its something good. I laugh at you guys dredging up these stories about the Koch brothers. The Democratic side of the aisle in morally bankrupt. If you're really going to talk about 40 yrs ago and Father Koch, can you please mention what Robert Byrd, Teddy Kennedy, and Father Gore were doing at about that time? Obama has created Czar after Czar with actual Communist sympathizers of true Communists and you mention Father Koch being investigated by the Committee on Unamerican Activities (or whatever it was called)? Let's do this, you guys post what you truly want to do and how you want to proceed and we will do the same. If you want to spend more, grow Govt, and create a nanny state, just say so. I am for limited Govt, lower taxes, and creation of more wealth for everybody, from poorer to richer etc. Please stop with the "gap" arugment of the rich get richer by proportion, its an idiotic premise.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kurt OBryan

1:52 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

I can not support a book that comes from a committed Atheist. Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged is so clearly counter to the what Christ preached. I can agree with many of your general ideas Galt of Muskego but using Ayn Rand as a prophet for those ideas does not help promote them.

Government is best when it is pushed to run efficiently. However, Ayn Rand essentially despises any form of government that provides for the common good. This mindset fits with the Koch Brothers who openly called for the abolition of the CIA, the FBI and the Public School System.

Comment_arrow

Aldo Raine

2:56 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Kurt, Ayn Rand is Nietzsche for Dummies. That includes people like our new Senator who lacks intellection coherence (hell, that's for fags) and feels he can follow both the Fountainhead and the Bible.

That's like saying you can be a Christian and a Rush Limbaugh fan. Imagine Limbaugh making it through the eye of the needle.

John Galt of Muskego

8:56 am on Saturday, April 16, 2011

The rich do get richer under Capitalism, yes. The poor get richer too. Maybe you could ban rich people from our economy and see how that works? And, NO, I am not rich. Take a guy who makes $50k/yr and a guy who makes $500k/yr for example. If the economy expands and each guy makes 20% more income, the first guy is now making $60k/yr, and the 2nd guy is now making $600k/yr. The gap has grown from $450k/yr to $540k/yr, but both people are now better off. Don't forget that the guy making $500-$600k/yr is already paying at a huge rate as the people in that bracket pay about 95% of the TOTAL tax burden now. I would move to go to a 25% across the board tax rate for everyone, this way the "richer" one is, the more they still pay but the huge percentage of the population that now pays nothing (or even receives more back than they pay) will now be contributing to the overall "common good". Please stop the demigoguing and offer solutions, the Alinski playbook isn't getting anyone, anywhere.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

11:32 pm on Monday, April 18, 2011

Sad to say, but in the last decade especially, the rich get richer, the middle class is basically flat in income and shrinking in numbers, and the working poor are losing ground.

You make some important points, and I think you are getting to the deeper reasons why people feel the way they do (and why we have such different positions).

I am not a socialist, but I favor a progressive tax code (and probably not a flat tax, although I don't know enough to be against for sure). I am also strongly against my elected officials being beholden to corporate interests to the exclusion of the needs of most citizens. That is where I am coming from. I think these Republican guys love power and wealth more than their eternal souls, and are screwing people over. Does that mean election fraud? I wouldn't put it past them.

Here is an interesting article on wealth imbalances. It has religious and pragmatic arguments for and against a more equitable distribution of wealth.

The point I think might impress you is: conservatives say that "only the rich can create economic growth. In the US this is contradicted by the history of our country. All the great industries of the 19th and 20th Centuries were created by individuals with no prior wealth. Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford, Bill Gates, etc. started with essentially nothing and built huge enterprises...."

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://robertdfeinman.com/society/wealth_distribution.html

Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

11:38 pm on Monday, April 18, 2011

oh, almost everyone pays taxes. If not income tax, then FICA, etc. Plus sales taxes. Plus citizens contribute to the country in other essential, non-tax ways. You mentioned volunteer work for the VA, and of course there are many other things you do that don't give a dollar to the Federal treasury but make this a better, stronger nation. Poor people do too.

John Galt of Muskego

11:50 am on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Randy, but I am a guy who will tell people upfront what I am about and not try to dupe people into my agenda. People like you are what my friends and I have coined "tough typers". You spout off in anonymity things you would never say while sitting at your local watering hole, because you know your thoughts are radical and leftist--and being overwhelmingly rejected. I am considering attending Jim Brownlow's upcoming coffee clutch, perhaps you'd like to share theories then. Sorry I couldn't keep up yesterday, I had to work at my non-taxpayer funded job and then did some volunteer work for the VA--I'm so ashamed of who I am, sure, yeah you totally got me there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

12:24 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

And where have I tried to dupe anyone? I guess my views lean left -- although that isn't so hard nowadays. You might be surprised what I'm willing to say and do in person, because I can have a reasonably cordial discussion with Libertarians and Communists (yes, you heard that right) alike.

You have a private sector job. I'm happy for you. Just understand that you're one pink slip, one downsize, one outsourcing away from being me twenty years from now. I was pretty middle of the road in my thirties. I thought my communist friends were rather quaint with their talk of unions and the hazardous conditions their parents had to work under and the lousy pay. Life taught me different.

John Galt of Muskego

11:59 am on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Speaking of War and Oil, I haven't noticed any anti-war yard signs and bumber stickers lately--like I did 4 yrs ago. Also, wasn't it a big conspriracy in 2008 when the evil oil companies were "profiteering" on oil prices because of the evil George Bush? Hmmmm, maybe war IS the answer and profit is a good thing now all of a sudden? Even though the left's Politics aren't transparent, their idealogical shortcoming sure are.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

12:28 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

I want the wars over with -- all three of them.

Comment_arrow

Aldo Raine

4:20 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

That's because Obama is going in there for real reasons, not Cheney's made up ones to treat people like rubes. Unless you are into it, many of us are not into seeing bodies pile up in Benghazi or tens of thousands of refugees fleeing into the now fragile situations in Tunisia and Egypt.

Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

11:46 pm on Monday, April 18, 2011

Another really good observation, John Galt, on Democratic responses to the wars. I have mixed feelings about the wars. Gaddafi's troops were on the brink of a massacre. But who is to say that we have created a better situation for them or for us? Maybe Iraq will turn out ok (I hope so)? What are we doing in Afghanistan? Hopefully more than just saving face?! Or is national prestige and proving our resolve actually worthwhile goals in and of themselves? Or would there really be a (worse) haven for Al Queda if we don't establish something stable there? Or maybe nuclear Pakistan would fall if we pull out with our tail between our legs? Why didn't we get Bin Laden with everything we had when we had the chance? Many "known unknowns" and few pretty-sure knowns.

My "inconsistent" position is because I trust Obama to try to do the right thing for America, whereas I was never sure who George Bush was trying to do right by.

John Galt of Muskego

2:01 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Dave must be a public union member, he has lots of time during the work week to post on blogs. Gee Dave, some of the things you say aren't very "co-existy". You should remember to keep your temper down. Here's some advice. Just say to yourself WWMBSD (What would my bumper sticker do). Better yet, walk out of the commune and peer at the rear end of your Smart car. It might say, "Make Love Not War, or COEXIST, or I Closed Wolski's". Anyway you slice it, its important and you're changing hearts and minds everywhere you go.

Reply

Randy1949

2:25 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Or Dave could be semi-retired and self-employed like me. It's probably a bad idea to make assumptions. By the way, I drive a Jeep, and my next car may be a truck. No bumper stickers so far, but my "Recall Scott Walker" should be arriving any day. :)

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

2:55 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Kurt, John Galt is just a character in a book, not the end all-be all. Again, maybe you could come out with your thoughts on how to handle the issues of society now. Please liberals, quit using the "common good" as your premise, we know its code for "Govt control." For example, the new light bulbs are for the common good, but in 3 yrs will be banned because of the mercury in them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kurt OBryan

3:10 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

We can agree on many things JG of M. I just think the name you chose discredits you as you chose a principal character in a book written by an aethist that promotes a view that is not consistent with fundamental teachings of Christ. John Galt would be the rich man in Christ's Camel through the eye of the needle parable.

John Galt of Muskego

2:59 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Randy, or maybe you guys could be "roommates"? --like Bert and Ernie kinda.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

3:20 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@John Galt. heh -- again with the innuendo. At least I'm assuming that's why you put the quotation mark around roommates. No, thank you, I've been married for 32 years, and now that our son has moved out, we have other uses for the spare bedrooms. Home office, for one. Library for the other. We own more books than just Atlas Shrugged, The Fountainhead, and The Ferenghi Rules of Acquisition.

John Galt of Muskego

3:15 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Kurt, as I've said before, I would have chosen the name Winston Smith but then would have to hear you remind me that Orwell was a Socialist. Have you ever noticed that if a Conservative does one small thing that is contradictory, it's a big deal? Can I not like Pearl Jam's music because I disagree with their politics now too? I bet you were angry when Obama ulogized Robert Byrd, huh?

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

3:24 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Aldo, interesting Limbaugh rant, considering he just raised millions again for charity this week.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

3:30 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Geez, I should change my name to something more palatable to the left like Che Guevara, Karl Marx, Fidel Castro or Bill Ayers. Aldo, nice threading with you but I'm pretty sure you're going to get booted from this site after your last comment--more of that compassionate and tolerant tone of the left I see.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aldo Raine

4:17 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Really? Kicked out by who? I thought Patch was owned by AOL, not the Koch brothers.

So Limbaugh did a bit of charity? Big fricken' whoop.

He has a lot more to atone for beyond what ever measly amount of money he's raised, considering he has more or less killed people with that microphone.

But that's the trouble with amateurs like you. You have to make it personal thanks to your dearth of real argument beyond what that chain smoking, sex-crazed, self-pitying Russian emigre has dished out in her comic books.

If you believe in celestial book keeping, Rush has a lot to make up for before the grim reaper arrives. He'd better get crackin'.

Guess the Limbaugh comment kinda smoked out how skewed your views are did't it Johnny based on your level of offense? Believe it or not, there are many among who do not worship the flaming Nazi gas bag.

You can get away with calling people socialists, communists, takers or whatever. Get used to it. Things will change are here.

Comment_arrow

Aldo Raine

4:21 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

By the way, you tone it down we'll all tone it down.

John Galt of Muskego

3:53 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Randy. In all seriousness, if someone agrees with the principals of Socialism, Marxism, Communism etc, then they should just come out and say it--and convince others that its the best idealogy. When the right was claiming Socialism on the left's part recently, it was strongly denounced and the "I'm offended" card was played by the left. If you want Socialized Medicine, just come out and say it. If you want the rates of Greece, just come out and say it. Whatever it is that you push for, just come out and say it. You may be willing to say it on a thread where no one knows you--or maybe even to everyone who does know you, but the fact is the leaders of the left in this Country never run on who they truly are and always become more "Conservative" come election time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

4:13 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

I have no problem with 'socialized' schools, roads, police protection, street lighting, etc. If you think that makes me a Socialist or a Marxist, go ahead. I see you have no problem with your medical care being paid for out of shared premiums from monies paid in by you and your employers, which is then passed on to the goods and services we all consume. I'm really for what's the most efficient.

I also have no problem with things like a minimum wage, work safety laws, speed limits, and whatever financial regulations are still left.

John Galt of Muskego

4:25 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Because its for the children or for the "common good" right Randy. So, Gov Walker asking Public Union Members to pay 5% of their own pension and 12% of their own Healthcare Premiums is not for the "common good" though, right? All these issues can be hashed out among everybody. My point is not what you individually are ready to admit, its what your party espouses and the platform it runs on. Sure, minimum wage can be a good thing--so why not make it $100/hr? Of course we need laws and regulations etc, but the idealogical difference is that your side believes Govt is always the answer and my side believes in limited Govt--which is often confused with "no Govt". Govt should be there for Military, Fire/Police, to build infrastructure, safety net programs, and basic yet essential services. Govt should not be an omni-present force constantly overseeing and controlling menial aspects of every day life. Before you get too far with your financial regulation vibe, you should know that Obama was very much in bed with Wall Street and FNMA during the Financial collapse. The collapse of the market was spurred by the housing industry, which exploded due to a Govt program known as the Community Reinvestment Act-introduced by Carter, put on steroids by Clinton and prolonged by Bush. Obama then gave Frankln Raines a cabinet position after he used the term "riskless assets" when referring to the housing market-he left FNMA with a golden parachute.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

5:00 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Asking is what you do when you sit down and bargain collectively. These benefit concessions, which amount to an 8% pay cut, are reasonable at a time when the state is short on revenue, and the various unions agreed to them. It's less reasonable when the Governor turns around and uses the savings for a tax cut to stimulate business. Well, as you say, it will stimulate business, so shouldn't the public workers be allowed to bargain for a restoration of benefits once the economy is booming again? But wait, they can't, because there will be no more collective bargaining as applies to wages. Of course, local governments may increase pay through a referendum. But wait, the State Assembly just overrode a referendum passed by voters in Milwaukee. I guess that's what you call freedom.

It all depends on what you would consider to be a 'menial' (I think you meant trivial) aspect of daily life. If I'm working with asbestos in my job I'd at least like to be warned.

Ahem. The collapse of the market was spurred by the bundling and selling of mortgages that were very poor risks to third and fourth parties. They were the 'junk bonds' of the new millennium, and I do blame the Democratic Presidents who dismantled the regulations just as much as i blame the Republican ones. Don't pin Obama on me.

John Galt of Muskego

4:31 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@Aldo, yes Patch is owned by AOL and affiliated with HuffPo, that's why I'm so glad that they published the Brookfield vote on the evening of the election:) You may not like Limbaugh, and personally I don't listen to his show, but I don't think being opinionated makes him evil, does it? I disagree with pretty much everything Jimm Carter does and says but I at least give him credit for his charity work.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aldo Raine

5:09 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

No one is evil, but what they do can be evil.

This goes way beyond simply disagreeing with him. Giving cover for hatred, bigoted beliefs, greed and the needless invasion of a country that did no harm to us which resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of people and displacement of over two million sure as hell qualifies as doing something evil. Making $400 MM a year off of it makes it supremely evil.

Like Louis Armstrong once said about jazz, "if I have to explain it to you, you'll never know."

Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

11:52 pm on Monday, April 18, 2011

could I please get a link to the Patch election night results?! Sorry, just can't find it.

John Galt of Muskego

6:51 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

No one is evil? There have been thousands of truly evil people. Hitler, Hussein, Mao, Polpot, Dahmer and so on....
Greed and the needless invasion of a Country that did no harm to us is truly evil, I do agree. I also agree that air raiding villages and bombing civilians is wrong--along with the lack of evidence of weapons of mass distruction. The untold loss and pain caused by our Military because of misguided leadership and war-mongering in order to bolster our ally's reserves for energy is unfortunate. Whatsmore, the fact that we went to war without Congressional approval is unconstitutional. But I digress, enough about Libya. Whatever we do, thank God Obama closed Gitmo like he promised.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seth Newman

12:00 am on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

John Galt, you're funny. Nice rhetorical switcheroo with "war without Congressional approval is unconsitutional. But I digress, enough about Libia." And I appreciate clever rhetoric especially when it deepens the argument.

The separation of powers is in sorry shape in this country. I wish Democrats would have a more serious discussion about how we start wars in this country. Vietnam was not a "police action" and just because NATO takes the lead or the UN provides legal justification or the African Union or Arab League or Libian citizens ask us in, don't we STILL need the US Congress to declare the USA can take military action?!

John Galt of Muskego

7:26 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

You mean who opened Gitmo? Bush opened it in 2002. Obama promised to close it before the end of his first term. What does the who and when it opened have to do with Obama not following through with his campaign promise?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

7:39 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Slippery. Has Obama's first term ended?

Never mind. He's not my guy. This is about political philosophy and where the country should go.

Maybe what this should have to do with is Bush Jr. starting off his watch with a surplus and running it into the ground.

John Galt of Muskego

7:51 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Sorry, Obama promised to close it within a year. He promised to cut the National deficit in half by the end of his first term.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

7:56 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

Neither promise fulfilled. So, Randy, who is "your guy" and why? Lyndon Larouche? Here is your chance to explain to us your world view and which American Politician best represents your philosophical beliefs. You still really haven't explained who you are or what you believe in, more just what's wrong, who's bad, and why I suck. Please enlighten me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

8:21 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

@John Galt, I' have no guy. I never have a guy. I only have the one who will screw me the least.

Here's the one who screwed me the least -- Dwight David Eisenhower.

Answer that and we'll talk.

John Galt of Muskego

8:32 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

I can't answer a statement, what's the question?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

12:24 pm on Sunday, April 17, 2011

You asked who my guy was, which American politician best represents my beliefs, and I answered Dwight Eisenhower. Too bad he's dead. So is Mo Udall, perhaps the last presidential candidate I could really support.

My question to you would be, since Ike was the last Republican President to balance a budget, would you support his economic policies?

John Galt of Muskego

4:21 pm on Sunday, April 17, 2011

I would not necessarily agree on some of his New Deal style applications of his administration. It would be hard to compare our Country now to what it was in the 30s-50s though either. The world is a much different place. I would have agreed with his Foreign Policy for the most part. No Politician is going to have everybody like every single thing he/she does. For example, take the average Republican now and compare them to JFK--and JFK is likely more Conservative, Politically speaking. Men like Ike and JFK were true leaders because they did in fact LEAD, not like most of the Politicians on each side of the aisle these days.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

4:19 pm on Monday, April 18, 2011

It appears Aldo may have been booted due to his tolerant and compassionate nature and respect for the freedom of speech of others.......

Reply

Seth Newman

12:02 am on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Thanks for the discussion thread. Be well, all.

Reply

John Galt of Muskego

3:53 pm on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

@Seth. I feel dirty and violated just for having seen their website, but here is a link to HuffPo commenting on the Brookfiled Patch election night results etc.......

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/09/wisconsin-election-bombshell_n_847000.html

Reply

Rick

9:40 am on Friday, April 22, 2011

@Randy... This is way off topic, sorry. But I cant let his statements go unchallenged.

You have stated several times how Bush blew a surplus and passed on a deficit. While on the face this is true, but you omit some details. See this wiki article...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/90/Revenue_and_Expense_to_GDP_Chart_1993_-_2008.png

Look at "Federal Tax Revenue and Expenses" graph. What jumps out to me are...

1997-99... Stocks soar.. on Dot-com speculation and other drivers
2001... Dot Bomb crisis on wall street... all the dot-com start-up that failed...
2001... Twin towers fall in terror attack

Between the dot-bomb and the real bombs falling in the war on terror the federal spending went up as revenues came down sharply.

2002 - 2007 Revenue is rebounding while spending is relatively flat.

2008 - Housing bubble bursts... Financial crisis grows

Late 2008 - The bottom falls out and revenues dip significantly
Since then we have had a slow recover of revenue to 2008 levels... but spending has exploded.

The number and trends tell the story...

However you totally miss the villain(s) in this sage. It isn't the President that passes the budget it is Congress... let us not forget the infamous words of Pelosi "We have to pass the bill so we can find out what is in it..." on a 700 Billion appropriation. This is why the Ryan proposal is so refreshing... even if it doesn't pass totally it is way past time to get serious about spending.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

10:24 am on Friday, April 22, 2011

GOP Debate in Manchester NH Jan 26, 2000: Bush: "It’s the president’s job to make sure Congress doesn’t have the money to spend in the first place. It is the president’s job to stand up to express the will of the people, advocate and fight for a meaningful real tax cut. And that’s what I’m going to do."

Two wars and a very expensive Medicare Part D Bill later, the administration chose to write IOUs rather than rescind tax cuts or use the veto. I think it's better to spend the money up front than borrow it at interest.

And: U.S. President George W. Bush, saying "our entire economy is in danger," urged Congress to approve his administration's $700 billion bailout proposal. Sept. 24, 2008.

Try not to blame it _all_ on the Democrats, please. I will agree with you that Bill Clinton bears some responsibility for this mess. NAFTA has not improved our situation.

Comment_arrow

Aldo Raine

10:44 am on Friday, April 22, 2011

President proposes and Congress disposes. Congress can only do so much to his budget, especially with Democrats that vote like Republicans. Anyone who follows politics knows that.

Duane Michalski

8:04 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

You liberals are nuts,,,really! The fact is the GAB found her to be stupid. We already knew that. Lets not forget the GAB is a bunch of Dems that were appointed by Jim "the hack" Doyle. So if the liberal GAB can't find nothing ILLEAGAL then I don't think little man tate will have much luck either. Too bad...so sad. Get over yourselves now....please!

Reply

Leave a comment