City Zoning Code Prohibits Church From Occupying Downtown Storefront
Downtown alderman asks Plan Commission to change zoning code to allow churches in the central business district.
Jeff Stupar, senior pastor at RiverPark Community Church, wants to reach the community in downtown Waukesha and help serve the needs of those who are addicted to drugs, alcohol and other issues.
He has the perfect location picked out with a vacant storefront at the corner of South Street and Grand Avenue. Perfect, that is, except for one minor problem.
“We could do everything there, but we can’t get in,” Stupar said.
The city’s zoning code prohibits churches from locating in the central business district. While there are churches in the outline areas of the central business district, the property RiverPark Community Church is looking to occupy is in the central business district.
“I could open up a bar here, but I can’t open up a church in the inner city,” Stupar told the Plan Commission on Wednesday night. “That is really hard for me to understand.”
Alderman Roger Patton, a retired minister and downtown alderman, has championed Stupar’s request and is asking the Plan Commission to revise the ordinance to allow churches in the central business district.
Patton was unable to attend Wednesday’s Plan Commission meeting, so the request did not approved.
“This is the first time in 10 years since we have changed the code that anyone has expressed an interest in placing a church in the central business district,” City Planner Mike Hoeft said.
The issue will come back in two weeks, and Mayor Jeff Scrima requested that information be provided about the vacancy rate for the property is in the last 10 years, including during strong economic times. Scrima also asked that the church speak with the Business Improvement District Board of Directors and ask them to come to the next Plan Commission meeting “as they are very involved and have a vested interest in the downtown,” he said.
The commissioners unanimously agreed with Scrima that the additional information would be useful. The issue was tabled until the next Plan Commission meeting with the additional feedback being required in order to come back to the commissioners.
“I think that would be good feedback and good information to be brought back to this commission for us to decide,” Scrima said.
RiverPark Community Church currently holds services at Bluemound and Springdale roads and wants to move the congregation to a storefront to reach those who are unlikely to drive to Bluemound Road. Stupar said the church doesn’t want to be a “suburban” church but wants to be located in the middle of the city.
“I have nothing against stained glass, I have nothing against steeples,” Stupar said. “… But there are going to be people who will not come near that building.”
Alderwoman Kathleen Cummings spoke to the Plan Commission and said that churches operate where there is the greatest need and the city’s response is not a reflection on the needy but on the aldermen and commissioners who are making the decisions.
“When there are downturns in the economy – that is when the greatest needs are and (the needs) are in the central city,” Cummings said. “They are not out on Bluemound Road. Somebody in need is not going to drive to Bluemound Road. … We are only a paycheck away from being in need. It happens to more people than you realize.”
Jeff
8:38 am on Thursday, January 27, 2011
Storefront churches, no matter how well-intentioned, project a negative image in downtowns and Waukesha should really think about what they want downtown to look like before changing the zoning ordinance. Think about the great downtowns in the area; Wauwatosa, Cedarburg, Shorewood, Whitefish Bay, Oconomowoc. Any storefront churches in these business districts?
Christy
12:37 pm on Thursday, January 27, 2011
Jeff, I'm curious why you think churches project a negative image in downtowns. Is this a personal dislike for churches, or do you actually have something substantial behind that statement? I have never heard of anyone thinking a church projected a negative image in a downtown, so this is news to me. I am sorry to hear, though, that you feel so negatively about the very presence of a church building. I can't imagine how it would be a bad thing for a group of people who want to reach out to the hurting in our community to be easily accessible to those people.
Sonia
9:06 am on Thursday, January 27, 2011
I was at the meeting last night and I was confused, because there used to be a storefront church in the downtown area. It was in the former grocery store next to Waukesha State Bank, which is currently an antique store. I seem to remember that they had a conditional use permit or something. Anyone remember that issue from a couple years ago?
Gregg Wandsneider
12:11 pm on Thursday, January 27, 2011
Sonia:
The church in question, Riverpark Community Church, actually used to occupy the space you are speaking of downtown at 210 Bank Street. I don't know what was the driving force behind the move to the current location of the church, (I don't know if it was Riverpark's decision to leave that downtown building, or if the city forced them out.) I have one question. What are we considering the central business district of the city? In my opinion, churches have as much right to be there as stores do as long as they are paying the rent.
Suzy Nicora Swearingen
12:52 pm on Thursday, January 27, 2011
I went to a beautiful store front church in German Town once but I can understand why the code is in place. If it was a young adult center even a church young adult center I could see no problem but good churches grow and that might make for a slow business sector but then again the Church in German town in surrounded by restaurants and they are now packed with more customers (The types of churches that go into store fronts have people there all the time not just Sundays) that could be good or bad for business.
Jeff
1:25 pm on Thursday, January 27, 2011
Christy, I said STOREFRONT churches, not churches in general. The storefront church, no matter how much good they do inside, projects a bad image of a community. It projects an image of a downtown that is going in the wrong direction. I hate the cliche, but "perception is reality" really fits the bill here. I am not saying its right but the presence of a storefront church projects the image of a distressed neighborhood.
Talk to developers and see if they would rather market a property with a storefront church next to it or without one. Talk to potential business owners about whether they would open up in a neighborhood with storefront churches.
Lets also not forget the financial aspect of this. If we start allowing churches in business districts and churches start buying up properties zoned for business, guess what? These properties come off the tax rolls. Downtown is also in a TIF district and what pays off money borrowed via a TIF? The taxes collected on increase in property value. Remove properties from tax rolls and the ability to repay TIF districts becomes more challenging.
I am not against this chuch and I think the City can work with them to find an appropriate location, I personally just think that retail space is not the right place if the City wants downtown to thrive.
Christy
1:29 pm on Thursday, January 27, 2011
Understood. Thanks for the clarification!